80 likes | 179 Views
Reporting Issues. HIV Joint Evaluation Workshop, Limbé , March 15 – 19 2010. Feedback on the r eports from MFAF, Finland:. General positive response to the methodological approach used by the GS Positive that the GS programme have various sources of funding.
E N D
Reporting Issues HIV Joint Evaluation Workshop, Limbé, March 15 – 19 2010
Feedback on the reports from MFAF, Finland: • General positive response to the methodological approach used by the GS • Positive that the GS programme have various sources of funding
Feedback on the latest reports from Norad, Norway (1): • Comprehensive presentation of activities (seminars, workshops etc.) • Successful implementation in spite of local conflicts (Kenya) • Strong focus on women
Feedback on the latest reports from Norad(2): • Achievements only reported on activity level. There is a need to present results on an aggregated level, to explain the impact on the target group • Logical sequence (Activities, results, goals) are not properly reflected in the report
Feedback on the latest reports from Norad(3): • Financial reports does not follow the narrative reports (description of results and activities) as presented in the project plan (application)
Comments on the requirements for Project Applications and Reports (Norad): • Work in Conflict Areas • Gender and equal opportunities • Assessment of new applications will include analysis of the results of previous projects in relation to the set project plans