370 likes | 475 Views
Technology as an Integral Part of the Music Classroom. Incorporating Group Activities & Online Discussion Lists to Enhance Student Learning, Attitude, & Retention. Dr. Scott D. Lipscomb. Institute for Music Research The University of Texas at San Antonio.
E N D
Technology as an Integral Part of the Music Classroom Incorporating Group Activities & Online Discussion Lists to Enhance Student Learning, Attitude, & Retention ATMI Conference, Toronto
Dr. Scott D. Lipscomb Institute for Music Research The University of Texas at San Antonio ATMI Conference, Toronto
Using Technology in theMusic Classroom • Pedagogical purposes • Clarify, illustrate, “bring to life” • Building a sense of community • Retention – “Learning Communities” • Change in the instructor/student roles • Collaborative learning • Students not “vessel to fill” • Group activities ATMI Conference, Toronto
Technology forPedagogical Purposes Enhanced Teaching Techniques ATMI Conference, Toronto
First Class & Syllabus • Instructions for accessing online material • Hardcopy of this info • “Getting Started” page for necessary plug-ins, etc. • Must include explicit instructions ATMI Conference, Toronto
LogOn to WebCT ATMI Conference, Toronto
Getting Started Page ATMI Conference, Toronto
Taking LearningOutside of the Classroom • Supplementary Materials • Table of Contents Page (MUS 2673) • Hard-to-Understand Musical Concepts • Meter & beat subdivisions • 12-bar blues • Strophic forms • Musical Events • Calendar ATMI Conference, Toronto
WebCT Calendar of Events ATMI Conference, Toronto
Building a Sense of Community • Using group activities • Students learn from students • More student-teacher interaction • Extends “office hours” … now my office hours are “real” • Discussion lists (requirement) • WebCT 3.0 ATMI Conference, Toronto
Discussion List (threaded) ATMI Conference, Toronto
Technology Evaluation 2-year project ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Tool (General Info) Chart • This course covered the material I expected based on the catalog description & course syllabus. • I successfully learned what I expected to learn in this course. • I liked the textbook for this class. ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Tool (Class Format) Chart • I liked the format of this class (i.e., the manner in which lecture & group activities were integrated). • I liked the manner in which technology was utilized by the instructor in the presentation of course content. • The use of TimeSketch and the Shockwave animations assisted me in understanding the musical concepts presented in class (e.g., musical form, meter, beat subdivision, etc.). ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Tool – (Learning) Chart • I benefited from the group activities in class (e.g., group RATs, discussions, etc.). • I learned a lot from preparing our group presentations (Brief & Final). • I learned a lot from listening to other group presentations (Brief & Final). ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Tool (Ease of Use) Chart • I benefited from the group activities online (e.g., Bulletin Board discussions). • I feel comfortable using technology (e.g., computers, the internet, email, etc.). • I found that accessing the web page for this course was easy and intuitive. • Overall, the use of WebCT enhanced my learning experience. ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Tool (WebCT modules) Chart • I found the "Course Content" section of WebCT to be useful. • I found the "Calendar of Events" section of WebCT to be useful. • I found the "Grade Report" section of WebCT to be useful. • I found the "Private Mail" section of WebCT to be useful. • I found the "Bulletin Board" discussion group section of WebCT to be useful. • Other? … (open-ended) ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Tool – (Benefit) Chart • In a general sense, I believe that I benefited from exposure to technology in the context of this course. • In comparison to other classes I have taken at UTSA, the individual assignments, group presentations, exam preparation, and WebCT required in this class took too much time. • I would recommend this course to another student. ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Tool (Access) Chart • I accessed WebCT from … • Home – On Campus – Both ATMI Conference, Toronto
Response Scale • 5 – agree strongly • 4 – agree • 3 – agree somewhat • 2 – disagree somewhat • 1 – disagree • 0 – disagree strongly ATMI Conference, Toronto
Subjects • Not a course requirement • Reward: 5 pts added to Final Exam grade • Total N = 261 • MUS 2673 n = 174 • MUS 2683 n = 75 • MUS 3153 n = 12 ATMI Conference, Toronto
Mean Responses ATMI Conference, Toronto
Means & Standard Deviations ATMI Conference, Toronto
Data Analysis A closer look ATMI Conference, Toronto
Repeated Measures ANOVA ATMI Conference, Toronto
Data Analysis Separate Groups ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Results – by Group Qs ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Results – by Group Qs ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Results – by Group Qs ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Results – by Group Qs ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Results – by Group Qs ATMI Conference, Toronto
Evaluation Results – by Group Qs ATMI Conference, Toronto
Access to Technology Q ATMI Conference, Toronto
Student Success? (a.k.a. “retention”) ATMI Conference, Toronto
Conclusions • Overall, technology integration has had a positive impact on my classroom • Students enjoy it (mostly) • Trend: the more it is used, the better the attitude • The use of groups (in class & online) facilitates the sense of community • Fosters retention • Clarifies difficult concepts • providing students a “virtual tutor” outside of class ATMI Conference, Toronto
Contact Info Dr. Scott D. LipscombInstitute for Music ResearchThe University of Texas at San Antonio lipscomb@utsa.edu http://imr.utsa.edu/lipscomb/ ATMI Conference, Toronto