1 / 30

Effective Classroom Assessment and Grading Practices

Explore testing methods, grading systems, and evaluating student work to enhance learning outcomes. Understand standardized testing and communicate grades effectively with families. Dive into norm-referenced and criterion-referenced grading, assessment reliability and validity, and the impact of grades on student motivation.

jamief
Download Presentation

Effective Classroom Assessment and Grading Practices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Classroom Assessment, Grading, and Standardized Testing Cluster 14 Modules 38 – 40

  2. Focus Questions • How will you test students on a unit of work? • How can you evaluate tests that accompany textbooks and teachers’ manuals? • How should you create multiple-choice and essay tests for your subject area? • Will you use authentic assessment approaches, including portfolios, performances, exhibitions, and scoring rubrics? • What are the potential positive and negative effects of grades on students? • What are examples of criterion-referenced and norm-referenced grading systems? • How will you explain your grading system to parents or caregivers who do not understand their children’s grades?

  3. What Would You Do? • Refer to page 603 Teacher’s Casebook • What would be your major graded assignments and projects? • Would you include credit for behaviors such as group participation and effort? • How would you put all the elements together to determine a grade for every student for every marking period? • How would you justify your system to the principal and to students’ families? • How will these issues affect the grade levels you will teach?

  4. Basics of Assessment • Measurement • Quantitative • Process of gathering information about students’ learning • Formal • Informal

  5. Formative and Summative Assessment • Formative Assessment • Occurs before or during instruction • Summative Assessment • Occurs after instruction

  6. Norm-Referenced and Criterion-Referenced Testing • Norm-Referenced • Comparison based on average performance of others • Criterion-Referenced • Comparison based on set standard

  7. Assessing Assessments: Reliability and Validity • Reliability • Likelihood that scores remain constant across time and conditions • Validity • Likelihood that test is measuring what it is intended to measure • Error in scores • Higher reliability=lower error

  8. Using Tests from Textbooks • Designed for the typical classroom • Do test questions match what teacher focused on in class?

  9. Objective Testing • Multiple Choice, Matching, True/False • Stem • Distractors • Used by half of teachers, even though 3/4 of education professors reject them

  10. Essay Tests • Should be focused on important, complex learning objectives • Students require more time to answer • Expectations should be clear

  11. Evaluating Essays • Use scoring criteria (rubrics) to help eliminate subjectivity • Grade all responses to one question before moving to other questions • Ask students to put name on back of paper • Have a second reader check for reliability

  12. Authentic Assessment • Require students to apply skills as they would in real life • Includes assessment on writing, speaking, listening, creating, critical thinking, research, and application

  13. Portfolios • A systematic collection of work • Includes work in progress, revisions, work analysis, and self-reflections • Document learning and progress

  14. Exhibitions • Public display of work • A culminating experience • Issues of equity should be considered • Judgment should be kept as objective as possible

  15. Informal Assessments • Journals • Checklists • Observations • Rating scales

  16. Norm-Referenced v. Criterion Referenced Grading • Norm-referenced grading • Student standing compared to other students • Criterion-referenced grading • Student standing compared to a set standard or list of accomplishments

  17. Effects of Grading on Students • Value of failing • Some failure may be beneficial • Retention in grade • 20% of high-school seniors have been “held back” • Affiliated with dropout, low self-esteem, lack of job opportunities

  18. Grades and Motivation • Assessments should enhance motivation • Assessments should reflect meaningful learning • Educator’s job: to select talent, or develop talent?

  19. Beyond Grading: Communicating with Families • Should be more than sending home grades • Notes • Phone calls for good news • Open houses • Websites • Portfolios

  20. Standardized Testing • NCLB • Policy • Concerns among politicians • Global competition • Knowledge about standardized tests

  21. Types of Scores • Measurements of Central Tendency and Standard Deviation • Mean, median, mode • Standard Deviation • How widely scores vary from mean

  22. Normal Distribution • Bell curve • See Fig. 40.1 on p. 637 • 68% of scores fall between 1 standard deviation above and 1 standard deviation below

  23. Percentile Rank Scores • Raw score compared to raw scores of norm group • Caution in interpreting percentile scores

  24. Other Scores • Grade Equivalent Scores • Standard Scores • Raw Scores

  25. Interpreting Standardized Test Reports • See Fig. 40.3 on p. 641

  26. Accountability and High-Stakes Testing • Quality of test and way test is used • Values/ethics of test • High-stakes testing • Helpful or harmful?

  27. Problems with High Stakes Testing • Very little test material overlaps with curriculum • Narrows curriculum • Takes up valuable instructional time • Could be damaging to student beliefs

  28. Use High-Stakes Tests Well • Match content standards • Be part of larger assessment plan • Test complex thinking • Provide alternate assessment strategies • Provide opportunities for retesting • Include all students • Provide appropriate remediation • Take language into account

  29. Help Students with Disabilities with High-Stakes Tests • Preparation should start earlier • Preparation should align closely with problems presented on test • Better equip students with necessary skills

  30. Diversity and Convergences • Teachers may hold lower expectations for minority students • Be cautious with information that will enter student file

More Related