1 / 33

Mid-day Meals Scheme Annual Work Plan Maharashtra 2010-2011

Mid-day Meals Scheme Annual Work Plan Maharashtra 2010-2011. Mid day meals. National Programme of Nutritional Support to Primary Education (Mid-Day-Meal Scheme ). Secretary,School Education and Sports Dept. Govt. of Maharashtra. Statistics.

jana-valencia
Download Presentation

Mid-day Meals Scheme Annual Work Plan Maharashtra 2010-2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mid-day Meals Scheme Annual Work Plan Maharashtra 2010-2011

  2. Mid day meals National Programme of Nutritional Support to Primary Education (Mid-Day-Meal Scheme) Secretary,School Education and Sports Dept. Govt. of Maharashtra

  3. Statistics • POPULATION: 969 Lakhs • NO. OF DISTRICTS 34 • NO OF BLOCKS 353 • LITERACY RATE 77.30% • NO OF PRIMARY SCHOOLS 84016 • NO. OF SECONARY SCHOOLS 38822 • ENROLLMENT IN STD 1-5 87.61 Lakhs • ENROLLMENT IN STD 6-8 48.12Lakhs • OPTED FOR MDM (1-5) 86.93 lakhs • OPTED FOR MDM (6-8) 47.99 lakhs

  4. No. Of Institutions Covered During 2009-10 Primary, Upper Primary

  5. Enrolment : Primary- 8761094 Upper Primary-4812160 No.of Children opted for MDM : Primary- 8693541 Upper Primary-4799110 Enrollment and children opted forMDM

  6. No .of Meals to be served as per PAB : Primary- 1328867757 Upper Primary-639794358 No .of Meals served Primary- 1078927923 Upper Primary-586538017 MDM – PAB Approval vs. Performance During 2009-10 (No.of meals)

  7. No .of Children as per PAB Approval : Primary- 8253837 Upper Primary-3973878 Average No. of children availed MDM with respect to no. of meals: Primary- 7054346 Upper Primary-3843186 MDM – PAB Approval vs. Performance During 2009-10(availed MDM)

  8. Rice Lifted (In MT) Primary- 117586 Upper Primary-83223 Rice Utilized (In MT ) Primary- 104605 Upper Primary-79804 Utilisation of Foodgrain

  9. Funds Released (Rs .in Lakh) Primary&- &- Upp..Pry 31668 Funds Utilized (Rs. in Lakh) Primary&- Upp.Pry.-32518 Utilisation of Cooking cost

  10. Salient Features of AWP & B 2010-11Number of students & Institutions

  11. Salient Features of AWP & B 2010-11

  12. Salient Features of AWP & B 2010-11Primary &Upper Primary

  13. Requirement Of Kitchen cum store

  14. Utilization of Central assistance towards Procurement Of Kitchen Devices

  15. Scheme implementation strategy adopted by state Government Government has taken a policy decision vide GR dated 18/06/09and adopted following strategies. 1) Transportation of rice directly to schools level by a agency appointed through open tendering process. • In urban area central Kitchen system has been adopted by inviting Expression of Interest form NGOs • In Rural Area Supply of other food grain items directly to schools by a agency appointed through open tendering process.

  16. Quality Management And Monitoring • Flying squads established at District level • Vigilance squads established at State level

  17. Food grains Transportations Present Food grains Transportations Revised Food grains Transportations FCI FCI FCI Dist Supply Officer Maharashtra State Co.op Marketing Federation (A State Gov.Undertaking) Tahsilder Ration shop School School

  18. Demands of State Government • Ceiling of 50%,35% & 15 % expenditure of MME should be kept flexible at discretion of State Govt. • MME funds allocated for External Monitoring & Evaluation should be permitted to use for Internal Monitoring purpose. State Government should be allowed to establish a separate State level MDM monitoring cell. The said cell will be of temporary posts which will be filled by deputation so that it will not create long term liability such as gratuity and pension etc. • Permission be given to conduct external evaluation in every 5 years for the whole state. It will be conducted in stages of 1/5thdistricts in every year.

  19. Evaluation Report of MDM Scheme in Primary Schools School Education & Sports Dept. Maharashtra State.

  20. Evaluation of MDM Scheme :Major findings • Evaluation of Mid-Day-Meal Scheme of 7722 Primary schools in 30 districts done by Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration (YASHADA), Pune • Evaluation covers all major aspects of MDM such as supply of rice and funds adequacy of funds, quality of rice, quality and quantity of food served to the children, community participation and monitoring system. • Impact of MDM on various educational indicators such as enrollment, attendance of children has been examined during evaluation

  21. Evaluation of MDM Scheme : Conclusion • All schools in the sample avail the facility of MDM. • The students who are from rich class do not take MDM in schools. Such children are 14% • 80% Schools served meals for more than 200 days • 1% Schools served meals less than 115 days.

  22. Problem encountered by the schools • Delay in payment of cooking cost. • Difficulty in finding cooks due to low benefit. • Headmasters/ Teachers have to spare average half hour to 50 min. a day for MDM related works. • Funds are inadequate for supplementary items. • Most of schools (77%) receive rice on time.

  23. Problem encountered by the schools • Cause of delay in supply of rice is the unavailability of rice at ration shop. • Variation found in quantity and quality of rice supplied. • The calories content of samples was found between 374 – 384 calories per 100 gm. • Observations indicate that less quantity of rice is cooked in schools.

  24. Infrastructure Arrangements • Majority of schools served food in corridor • In 85% of schools food is cooked either in corridors or in empty classrooms. • In 41% of schools rice storage rooms are well and 44% of schools the rooms are not good enough but rice is stored in ‘Kothi’ • In 62% of schools firewood is used for cooking. • Adequate cooking utensils are available in almost of schools.

  25. Infrastructure Arrangements • In 38% of schools Self Help Groups cooked the meals.

  26. Quality of food • Protein content are sufficient. • Nutritional requirements not fulfilled as food contents 180-386 calories. • ‘Khichadi, Masala rice and Varan Bhat’ are most common menu observed • 85% of teachers test the food before serving to children.

  27. Community Participation • In general 4-39 % of schools observed community participation. • In 51% schools parents supervise and help serving of food to children.

  28. Monitoring of Scheme • 54% of VEC/WEC/Local committee members and 52% of parents visited schools at least once in a week • 43% of schools visited once in a year by MDM superintendents. • 96% schools maintain rice register

  29. Impact of MDM • MDM had positive impact on regular attendance of children post lunch attendance of children, enrollment and decrease in drop out rate of students. • It is also observe that concentration of children increased. • MDM facilitate the abolition of classroom hunger. • Pupils of all social background seem to be quite happy to sit to be others and share the same food.

  30. Impact of MDM • Majority (60-65%) of the cooks were the women and most of them come from underprivileged backgrounds.

  31. Recommendations • A separate administrative set up is essential for effective implementation of MDM. • All the approved post of Block Superintendents should be filled. • Advanced technology should be used for data management. • A central cooking agency should be identified in each block

  32. Recommendations • The rice and funds could be directly transformed to cooking agency. • The funds should be released as per SSA procedure.

  33. Thanks…

More Related