150 likes | 728 Views
Optimal health vs fitness benefits Mode Frequency Duration Intensity Training Principles (highly dependent on training goal) Overload Specificity reversibility Endurance training and VO 2 max fitness marker
E N D
Optimal health vs fitness benefits • Mode • Frequency • Duration • Intensity • Training Principles (highly dependent on training goal) • Overload • Specificity • reversibility
Endurance training and VO2max fitness marker To increase markers, programs should involve intensity of 60-85% VO2max; 75-90% HRmax; RPE of 13-16 Genetic predisposition accounts for 40-60% of one’s VO2max value VO2 max increases an average of ~ 15% as a result of an endurance training program
Q and a-v O2 differences • VO2 max = HR x SV x (a-v O2 diff) • In sedentary persons, ~50% of the increase in VO2 max is related to an increase in maximal stroke volume, and 50% is due to an increase in the a-v O2 difference • The large differences in VO2max in the normal population are due to differences in maximal stroke volume
Endurance training and LT fitness marker • LT1 generally occurs between 40 & 60% of VO2max; LT2 over 80-95% of VO2max • LT increases an average of 20-40% as a result of an endurance training program • Maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) • Fartlek workout • Interval Training
Periodization Plan for training based on a manipulation of the fitness components with the intent of peaking the athlete for the competitive season or varying HRF training in cycles of harder or easier training
Training Adaptations Physiological changes or adjustments resulting from an exercise training program that promote optimal functioning