1 / 36

Sex Research

Sex Research. Methods and Concerns. sexology. The study of sexuality Goal – to understand, predict, and control sexual behavior. Control?. Is it a good thing to control sexual behavior? Yes – we need to decrease unwanted pregnancies and STD’s

jana
Download Presentation

Sex Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sex Research Methods and Concerns

  2. sexology • The study of sexuality • Goal – to understand, predict, and control sexual behavior

  3. Control? • Is it a good thing to control sexual behavior? • Yes – we need to decrease unwanted pregnancies and STD’s • Uncertain – Should we choose our children’s sex? Should we change orientations?

  4. Non-experimental methods • Often used • Convenient • Frequently cost-effective • But tell us nothing about causation

  5. The case study • An intensive study of an individual or a small group • Advantages – flexible comprehensive

  6. Case study limits • Difficulty generalizing results from such a small sample • Subject to the failings of memory • Sometimes, completely unsuitable

  7. surveys • A sample of people are questioned about their behavior and attitudes • Many advantages: relatively inexpensive quick lots of people & data both anonymity and rapport

  8. The all-important sample • Sample – interviewing a relatively small group to draw conclusions about a much larger one • Representative – all subgroups within the population of interest in their proper proportions • Random – everyone in population has equal chance

  9. Sampling gone awry • Is it truly representative? Not if only 15% reply Miss out on key sub-groups • The self-selection dilemma – some participants are too eager, these tend to be more experienced and comfortable with sex

  10. Other Survey Hazards • Are the responses accurate? vulnerable to exaggeration, memory lapses, and socially desirable responses • Demographics – most who respond are: too educated mostly white-collar • Missing minorities are often the most interesting

  11. Also, … • Ambiguous, misleading questions will ruin any survey, no matter how well-conceived. • Should the survey be conducted through a written questionnaire or an interview? • Or should both be utilized?

  12. Surveys that mattered • Kinsey Males (1948) 5,300 – participated Females (1953) 5,940 “ “ • Obvious flaws All white too many highly educated urban WASPs

  13. Kinsey’s contribution • Despite shortcomings, still relevant • Demonstrated that sexual behavior is influenced by education and the undeniable presence of bisexuality • Also provided a baseline against which all subsequent investigations could be prepared

  14. The National Health and Social Life Survey • A response to two compelling challenges: 1) The Aid’s crisis of the late 80’s, and 2) A complete lack of information regarding current sexual practices • Initial plans called for a huge, truly representative sample of 20,000 • But in ’91 federal funding was yanked

  15. A Methodological Triumph • Undaunted, its proponents lined up private funding, to survey a truly representative sample of 4,369 • An amazing response rate of 79% • Adequately covered whites, African- Americans and Hispanics • Administered by 220 carefully trained interviewers • Well designed, internally consistent

  16. Survey Says! Americans are: 1) content with their love lives, 2) less sexually active than anticipated, and 3) quite conservative

  17. Sexual Violence Survey • Is there a connection between watching violent porn and sexual coercion? • 222 male nonoffenders were surveyed about porn viewing preferences • Within the last year, 81% had viewed nonviolent porn • 35% had watched sexually violent porn • The latter were more likely to use force/rape

  18. Meta-Surveys • Several surveys reveal that exposure to violent (sexual) media tends to: 1) increase tolerance for violence, 2) cause some to think that women want to be raped, 3) decrease sensitivity to victims, & 4) for some, to increase the probability of rape

  19. Alcohol & sexual response • Do a few drinks increase or impair sexual responsivity? • 20,000 survey participants • 60% said, YES! • Women were even more convinced • But did they really remember?

  20. Direct observation • A research design in which trained reporters watch and record responses • Used most effectively byMasters & Johnson (1966)

  21. Human Sexual Response • Influential and respected • Watched sexual behavior in the laboratory and recorded the relevant physiological responses • Good numbers - 382 women and 312 men • A non-representative sample, but with physiological measures, it might not matter

  22. Human sexual response ii • Innovative techniques • Thorough follow-up interviews • Non-subjective, quantifiable • No worries about memory deficits • But the participants knew they were being watched?!

  23. Experimental methods • Present participants with certain events/stimuli under controlled conditions that allow for reliable measurement of their reactions • This control allows us to make inferences regarding causation • With this ingredient, we can control behavior

  24. basics • The Independent Variable – the factor controlled by the researcher For example, 6 hours of watching sexually violent videos • The Dependent Variable – resulting behavior after the use of the independent variable as measured by the researcher For example, responses to questionnaire

  25. An actual experiment • Hypothesis – viewing sexually violent media causes tolerance of and an increase in aggressive and assaultive behavior

  26. Study 1 • Method • 271 men • Half watch films in which women are victimized, but later “fall” for the abuser • Others watch nonviolent movies

  27. Results • When questioned days later, men who had watched the violent film were much more tolerant of sexual violence against women

  28. Other studies • Rapists exposed to sexually violent and abusive films became sexually aroused • Nonrapists did not • Both groups aroused by consensual sex

  29. Experiments on Alcohol and Sex • Reveal that arousal is decreased by drinking • Also, the more consumed the greater the decrease • Holds for both men and women • Varies greatly from survey self reports • Lab setting influence results?

  30. Sexology Technology • Electronic measures of arousal – much more accurate than self reports • Penile strain gauge – a device which measures changes in the circumference of the penis • Very sensitive • Used with sex offenders

  31. And for women … • The vaginal photoplethysmograph – a device which measures increases in vaginal blood flow • photosensitive

  32. Also • Brain imagining studies • reveal that hand holding reduces neural activity in brain areas linked to the anticipation of threats • Show that bisexuals may not be what we thought

  33. Computer Assisted Self-Interview • A “CASI” • Overcomes literacy and social problems • Simply listen, point and click • All in privacy • Has worked well with teenagers

  34. Cyber Sexology • Using the internet to collect sex-related data • Many advantages • Significant concerns

  35. Advantages • Cheap – by usually 20-80% less staff, paper, postage • Participants feel safer • Flexible, easy to modify • Access to vast numbers of participants • Some virtually impossible otherwise • Greater accuracy – “help” menus standardization

  36. Drawbacks • Sampling bias – “the digital divide” participants tend to be younger, more educated and affluent, male but every year this factor recedes • Ethical concerns – participants often recruited through unsolicited emails true anonymity is illusory

More Related