1 / 40

Electronic Benefit Transfer Planning Services RFP-12-57

Electronic Benefit Transfer Planning Services RFP-12-57. Pre-Proposal Conference February 15, 2011 Kyle McClurg, IDOA Strategic Sourcing Analyst. General Information. Sign-In Sheet for Attendees Sign-In Sheet and PowerPoint will be posted on IDOA’s Solicitation Website

janae
Download Presentation

Electronic Benefit Transfer Planning Services RFP-12-57

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electronic Benefit Transfer Planning ServicesRFP-12-57 Pre-Proposal Conference February 15, 2011 Kyle McClurg, IDOA Strategic Sourcing Analyst

  2. General Information • Sign-In Sheet for Attendees • Sign-In Sheet and PowerPoint will be posted on IDOA’s Solicitation Website • Hold questions until the end of the presentation

  3. Agenda • General Information • Purpose of RFP • Background Information • Scope of RFP • Key Dates • Proposal Preparation & Evaluation • Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises • Question and Answer Session

  4. Purpose of the RFP • The purpose of this RFP is to select a vendor that can satisfy the State’s need for electronic benefit transfer (EBT) planning services. • It is the intent of the Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) to contract with a vendor that provides quality EBT planning services for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Program.

  5. Background • The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) was established through the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 and reauthorized by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. • WIC services are available in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and U.S. territories. Congress funds the WIC Program through the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services Division (USDA/FNS). • The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for WIC Program provides nutritious foods to eligible pregnant, postpartum, and breastfeeding mothers, infants, and children to five years of age at, or below, 185% of poverty who are at nutritional risk.

  6. Background cont. • The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) provides grants to the Indiana WIC Program which enters into agreements with local agencies to provide: • Eligibility determination; • Nutrition counseling; • A food delivery system utilizing negotiable checks redeemable at local grocers and pharmacies; and • Related administrative services to WIC participants.

  7. Background cont. • The ISDH-WIC Program serves approximately 174,119 participants through contracts with 49 Sponsoring Agencies. • WIC services are provided at 149 local agency WIC clinics to certify participants, collect health data and generate food instruments. • These food instruments are redeemed at 700 authorized vendors throughout the state. Approximately 420,000 WIC checks are redeemed each month.

  8. Background cont. • Many of Indiana’s WIC clinics distribute Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program (FMNP) checks to WIC participants during the growing season which is typically during the months of May through October. • The FMNP distributes approximately 100,000 checks per year to over 30,000 households. • Certification and check distribution for FMNP is completed through the WIC information system as well. • In addition to the WIC and FMNP programs, the Indiana WIC information system connects electronically to a banking component which rejects or approves payment of checks distributed through the information system.

  9. Scope of Work(Purpose) • The ISDH-WIC Program is requesting services from a third-party consultant to analyze the ISDH-WIC Program’s ability to comply with provisions of the Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010, which requires states to migrate from a paper-based food benefits delivery system to an EBT system by 2020.

  10. Scope of Work(Purpose) cont. • The purpose of the RFP is to complete a(n): • Cost Analysis (CA); • Feasibility Study (FS); • Analysis of which of the two EBT approaches (online/offline) is the best solution for Indiana; • Analysis of the current or future ISDH-WIC Program’s information system to determine if there are any compatibility issues; • Analysis of future continuing operations costs and the ability of the ISDH-WIC Program to support any additional costs.

  11. Scope of Work (Objectives) • Objectives of vendor: • Evaluate WIC EBT capability for Indiana WIC’s future web-based data system. • Evaluate Indiana WIC retail vendor equipment and software alternatives. • Assess WIC EBT impacts of financial transactions. • Assess Indiana WIC’s clinic infrastructure capability. • Assess WIC EBT card technology alternatives. • Recommend an WIC EBT technical solution based on whether WIC EBT can be cost-effective, affordable in the state of Indiana; and if a solution is feasible. • Recommend a 2-5 year plan for the state of Indiana to pursue WIC EBT.

  12. Scope of Work (Possible Outcomes) • Once the WIC EBT planning services are completed, the ISDH-WIC Program will work with the successful Respondent to complete an Implementation Advance Planning Document (IAPD) by using the information from the analysis. The IAPD will then be submitted to the USDA for approval so that the implementation tasks necessary to implement WIC EBT can begin. • Possible outcomes of the contract: • Maintain and operate current paper benefit delivery system. • Transfer to an online WIC EBT system. • Transfer to an offline WIC EBT system.

  13. Key Dates

  14. Business Proposal(Attachment E) • Company Financial Information (Section 2.3.3) • Confidential information must be kept separate from the proposal in both hard and soft copy • Contract Terms (Section 2.3.5) • Respondent should review State contract and note exceptions to State mandatory and non-mandatory clauses in Transmittal Letter • Preferences (Sections 2.3.14) • Buy Indiana Initiative/Company • Must have this certified by the proposal due date

  15. Technical Proposal(Attachment F) • Management Plan • Include a narrative description of the proposed effort and a list of the items to be delivered or services to be provided. The Management Plan must describe your approach to addressing the work outlined in this RFP. • This description must include who is involved. • The Management Plan will also briefly describe what unique capabilities and skills your team brings to this project. • Detail how your staff meets a need for a reasonable balance between professional personnel and technicians. • Detail how top-level management will continue a high level of interest in, and assume responsibility for, the success of the project.  • The Management Plan must also cover how the Respondent plans to work with other vendors or contractors for additional work related to the process.

  16. Technical Proposal cont.(Attachment F) • Communication and Coordination Plan • The successful Respondent must adhere to the communication protocol determined by the State and as outlined in the Communication and Coordination Plan. • The Communication and Coordination Plan must include the Respondent’s communication approach, including events such as status reports and conference calls. • The Communication and Coordination Plan must also include all applicable entities, including the State, the Respondent, and any subcontractors. This plan must describe the communication and coordination among the units of the Respondent’s project team. The State contact will be the Director of the ISDH – WIC Program or their designee.

  17. Technical Proposal cont.(Attachment F) • At a minimum, the Communication and Coordination Plan must include: • Monthly electronic status reports. • As needed telephone conference calls between the Project Manager/Liaison and State staff to discuss the status of the enhancements, operations updates, or any other issues. • Regular telephone conference calls between the Respondent’s technical lead and the State staff to ensure adequate communication. • Methodology for providing reports to the State. • Strategy for maintaining an open line of communication among all entities associated with this project. • As part of the response, Respondent must provide a preliminary Communication and Coordination Plan. • Respondent will provide the final Communication and Coordination Plan to the State no later than two (2) weeks after contract execution.

  18. Technical Proposal cont.(Attachment F) • Project Work Plan • A preliminary Project Work Plan must be submitted with the proposal. • The Project Work Plan must include all deliverables and proposed completion dates. • The preliminary Project Work Plan will be the basis of the final Project Work Plan. Changes to the final Project Work Plan require written agreement between ISDH – WIC Program and contractor. • The Project Work Plan must include the following: • Project Staffing • Project Tasks, Deliverables, and Schedule

  19. Technical Proposal cont.(Attachment F) • Project Work Plan cont. • Respondents are strongly encouraged to focus on explaining exactly how they will perform the work requested, how they will assign staff, how they will manage the project, and what specific methods, tools and techniques they will utilize. • Respondents are cautioned that the State does not want a regurgitation of the RFP; it wants a step by step reasoned explanation of the Respondent’s strategy and tactics for meeting the needs outlined in this RFP. • Any changes to the project work plan must be approved by the State. • The successful Respondent will provide the final Project Work Plan to the State no later than three (3) weeks after contract execution.

  20. Technical Proposal cont.(Attachment F) • Planning Service Deliverables • The successful Respondent is responsible for working with the State and other stakeholders to create the following deliverables according to the timeline. The successful Respondent is expected to deliver a final draft of each document for State review prior to creating the final document. Each deliverable should take into account the needs of both WIC and FMNP. • Cost Analysis (CA) • Feasibility Study (FS) • Project Management Plan • Schedule of Development Activities, Milestones and Deliverables • Proposed Budget • Cost Allocation Plan • Implementation Advance Planning Documents (IAPD) • Request for Proposal Development

  21. Technical Proposal cont.(Attachment F) • The aforementioned deliverables are detailed in Section 2.4 of the RFP and in Chapter 4 of the FNS Handbook 901 found at http://www.fns.usda.gov/apd/Handbook_901/HB901_2007.htm. • All Respondents must familiarize themselves with this Handbook.

  22. Technical Proposal cont.(Attachment F) • For the Procurement Support Activities listed below, describe your experience in performing these activities, the methodology to be used to produce the deliverable and a description of the deliverable. • Preparation of Implementation (Transfer or Development) RFPs. • Technical and pricing evaluation methodologies. • Evaluation support. • Identify any additional procurement activities you think may be required to meet the objectives listed above along with your experience, the methodology and a description

  23. Technical Proposal cont.(Attachment F) • Staff: • Respondent staff assigned must have proven oral and written communication skills, the ability to effectively communicate with individuals and small groups, the ability to coordinate task-oriented group efforts, as well as acceptable and proven preparation and presentation skills. The Respondent’s response must include resumes of proposed staff indicating prior experience in these skills. • Project Manager • The Project Manager is responsible for ensuring the Respondent’s efforts meet the ISDH-WIC Program’s requirements and by ensuring that required deliverables are completed as scheduled. • Must have a minimum of five (5) years experience in project management of Information Technology type projects. • Project timeline on the next slide.

  24. Technical Proposal cont.(Attachment F)

  25. Cost Proposal(Attachment D)

  26. Cost Proposal cont.(Attachment H) • The baseline for this RFP is $101,400 (for the 32 month life of the contract). • Respondents must complete the Cost Proposal Template (Attachment D) to submit their pricing to the State. • Calculating a “Total Bid Amount” that will be compared to the baseline

  27. Cost Proposal cont.(Attachment H) • Scoring: • Respondents who meet the State’s current baseline cost will receive zero (0) cost points. • Respondents who propose a decrease to the State’s current costs will receive positive points at the same rate as bid increasing cost. • Respondents who propose an increase to the State’s current cost will receive negative points at the same rate as bid lowering cost. • Respondents who propose a 10% decrease to the State’s current baseline cost will receive all of the available cost points. • If multiple Respondents decrease costs below 10% of the current baseline, an additional 5 points will be added to the Respondent proposing the lowest cost to the State.

  28. Proposal Preparation • Buy Indiana, Business Proposal 2.3.14 • Status shall be finalized by proposal due date • 5 definitions, details provided in Business Proposal • Indiana Economic Impact, Attachment C • Definition of FTE (Full-Time Equivalent) • Example: If a Respondent has 5 full time employees and is bidding on its 5th contract, and all contracts get an equal amount of commitment from the employees then each employee commits 20% of his or her time to the new contract: 0.2 x 5 employees= 1 FTE.

  29. Proposal Preparation • Attachment D (Cost Proposal) must be returned in Excel • Use the templates provided for all answers • Do not alter templates • Please list all Attachments in Attachment J (Summary of Attachments)

  30. Proposal Evaluation Summary of Evaluation Criteria: 1. Adherence to Mandatory Requirements • Pass/Fail 2. Management Assessment/Quality (Business & Technical Proposal) • 35 points 3. Cost (Cost Proposal) • 20 points 4. Indiana Economic Impact • 15 points 5. Buy Indiana • 10 points 6. Minority (10) and Women Business (10) • Subcontractor Commitment 20 points * 100 Total Points (7 bonus possible)

  31. Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises Charles Hill, MWBE Division • Contact Information - Email: chahill@idoa.in.gov or Phone: 317-233-0545 • Complete Attachment A, MWBE Form - Include sub-contractor letters of commitment • Goals for Proposal - 8% Minority Business Enterprise - 8% Women’s Business Enterprise

  32. Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises Prime Contractors must ensure that the proposed subcontractors meet the following criteria: • Must be listed on the IDOA Directory of Certified Firms • Each firm may only serve as once classification – MBE or WBE • A Prime Contractor who is an MBE or WBE must meet subcontractor goals by using other listed certified firms. Certified Prime Contractors cannot count their own workforce or companies to meet this requirement. • Must serve a commercially useful function. The firm must serve a value-added purpose on the engagement. • Must provide goods or service only in the industry area for which it is certified as listed in the directory at http://www.in.gov/idoa/2352.htm • Must be used to provide the goods or services specific to the contract • National Corporate Diversity Plans are generally not acceptable

  33. Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises TOTAL BID AMOUNT:

  34. Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises • Effective May, 2011, a new MWBE scoring methodology will be utilized for all RFP’s released • New Process – MWBE scoring is conducted based on 20 points plus a possible 2 bonus points scale - MBE: Possible 10 points + 1 bonus point - WBE: Possible 10 points + 1 bonus Point • Professional Services Scoring Methodology: - The points will be awarded on the following schedule: - Fractional percentages will be rounded up or down to the nearest whole percentage - Submissions of 0% participation will result in a deduction of 1 point in each category - The highest submission which exceeds the goal in each category will receive 11 points (10 points plus 1 bonus point). In case of a tie both firms will receive 11 points

  35. Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises RFP MWBE Scoring Example

  36. Additional Information IDOA PROCUREMENT LINKS AND NUMBERS http://www.in.gov/idoa/2354.htm 1-877-77BUYIN (8946) For Vendor Registration Questions http://www.in.gov/idoa/2464.htm For Inquiries Regarding Substantial Indiana Economic Impact • http://www.in.gov/idoa/2467.htm Link to the developing “one stop shop” for vendor registry with IDOA and Secretary of State. B. Secretary of State of Indiana: Can be reached at (317) 232-6576 for registration assistance. www.in.gov/sos C. See Vendor Handbook: Online version available at http://www.in.gov/idoa/files/vendor_handbook.doc • Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprises: http://www.in.gov/idoa/files/Certification_List(48).xls for table of IDOA certified MBEs and WBEs. For more WBE’s information http://www.in.gov/idoa/2352.htm E. RFP posting and updates: Go to http://www.in.gov/idoa/2354.htm (select “State of Indiana Opportunities” link) Drag through table until you find desired RFP/RFI number on left-hand side and click the link.

  37. Questions and Answers

  38. Thank You kmcclurg@idoa.in.gov

More Related