1 / 53

Food Defense

Food Defense. In a Swine Production Setting. Courtesy of Food Technology magazine, from "Defending the Food Supply," August 2005, Vol. 59, No.8.  Food Technology is a publication of the Institute of Food Technologists, www.ift.org . . Is Our Food Safe From Attack?.

jared
Download Presentation

Food Defense

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Food Defense In a Swine Production Setting Courtesy of Food Technology magazine, from "Defending the Food Supply," August 2005, Vol. 59, No.8.  Food Technology is a publication of the Institute of Food Technologists, www.ift.org.

  2. Is Our Food Safe From Attack?

  3. The U.S. government has declared the food and agriculture sector to be one of 17 critical national infrastructures vulnerable to intentional attack.

  4. Will this Effect Missouri? • Missouri ranks 2nd in the nation for number of farms. • 7th in the nation for hogs and pigs

  5. “Show Me the Money” • Missouri farms rank 15th nationally for cash receipts. • Missouri farms have estimated cash receipts of 5.82 billion dollars per year.

  6. Case Study: Bitter Harvest • 1973 Fire retardant (PBB) accidentally mixed into feed rations for cattle. • Over a year later sickness in animals, and humans is linked to PBBs. • Cattle, pigs, sheep, chickens, and contaminated commodities are destroyed and buried. • 97% of humans living in Michigan during that time have PBBs in their system.

  7. What Type of Harm Could Occur? Intentional delivery of a harmful biological or chemical agent to the food supply system could cause: • Physical harm (illness or mortality) • Economic disruption • Direct • Indirect • International • Political unrest • Psychological harm – loss of confidence in food supply

  8. Case Study: Melamine • Contaminated Wheat Gluten→ pet food . • Cats and dogs fall ill and some die. • Massive recall of pet food • Contamination was intentional. • Waste pet food fed to hogs in 7 states • 56,000 hogs quarantined

  9. -Farrow to Finish Operation

  10. -Feeder Pig Operation

  11. Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation CAFO

  12. -Boar Semen Artificial Insemination (AI) is an important part of the swine industry. It is also an area that is vulnerable to contamination.

  13. -Supply Chain

  14. -Feed Mill

  15. -Transportation -Transportation

  16. -Buying Station

  17. What is Food Defense? Food Defense focuses on security, protecting the food supply from intentional contamination. Courtesy of Food Technology magazine, from "Defending the Food Supply," August 2005, Vol. 59, No.8.  Food Technology is a publication of the Institute of Food Technologists, www.ift.org.

  18. Is Food Defense Different than Biosecurity? • Food Defense focuses on protecting the food supply fromintentional contamination. • Biosecurity and Food Safety (HACCP) focus on protecting the food supply from unintentional contamination. They help with, but are not a substitute for food defense.

  19. Who Might Intentionally Contaminate an Animal Production Facility? • Disgruntled employee/former employee • Contract or temporary employee • Members of terrorist or extremist groups • Truck driver • Affiliate of a competing facility • Visitor to facility

  20. Biological Agents: Injure by causing disease, or producing toxin. Chemical Agents: Injure through toxicity to biological systems, or chemical burns to tissue. Radiological Agents: Injure externally with radiation burns and potentially deadly acute radiation sickness. Injure internally by causing damage to internal organs. Potential Contaminants

  21. Biological Agents of Concernin a Swine Production Facility • Diseases • Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) • Foreign Animal Disease (FAD) • Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) • Classical Swine Fever (Hog Cholera) • ZoonoticDisease • Pseudorabies • Swine Vesicular Disease (SVD)

  22. Case Study: This Little Piggy • 1998, Malaysia cases of pigs dying were not immediately recognized as outbreak • Oct. 1998 Pig farm workers suffer possible encephalitis epidemic(265 cases, 105 deaths) • Identified as new virus now called Nipah • Over a million pigs from nearly 1,000 farms were destroyed. • Pig production is reduced from 2.4 million to 1.32 million, and farms from 1885 to 829.

  23. Chemical Agents • Any Chemical not approved for use on the animals, or in their feed would be considered a contaminant. • Chemical agents used in acts of terrorism against livestock include: • Arsenic • Cyanide salt • Pesticides

  24. Radiological Agents Livestock can be exposed to radiation via inhalation, ingestion of contaminated feed, or direct exposure. • Polonium 210 • Plutonium • Uranium (U-235 or U-238) • Iodine 131 (I-131)

  25. What Makes an Attractive Agent of Intentional Contamination? • Long incubation period/delayed effect • Highly effective • History of use • Available (easily produced in adequate quantity) • Low traceability

  26. What Do Consumers Think About Food Defense? Following several major food recalls in the US, consumer surveys were conducted. Courtesy of Food Technology magazine, from "Defending the Food Supply," August 2005, Vol. 59, No.8.  Food Technology is a publication of the Institute of Food Technologists, www.ift.org.

  27. Consumer Confidence in Food Defense Systems After National Food Recalls Stinson et al., 2008

  28. Who Do Consumers Believe is Responsible for Food Defense? Stinson et al., 2008

  29. Products That Consumers Believe Most Likely to be Intentionally Contaminated Stinson et al., 2008

  30. Who do Consumers Believe Should Pay for Food Defense? Stinson et al., 2008

  31. Food Defense Plan Defense plans are encouraged but not required for farms and most food establishments. Courtesy of Food Technology magazine, from "Defending the Food Supply," August 2005, Vol. 59, No.8.  Food Technology is a publication of the Institute of Food Technologists, www.ift.org.

  32. Facilities Currently Required to Participate in Food Defense All vendors providing food for USDA feeding programs must now be in compliance with the Food Defense System.

  33. Four Steps for Developing a Food Defense Plan • Assess the vulnerabilities • Write a plan • Evaluatethe plan • Maintain the plan

  34. Assessthe vulnerabilities • Gather a team of key personnel to make the assessment. • Think like someone who wants to harm your operation. • Look for areas where contamination would be spread through normal operations. • Look for sensitive areas that are not frequently observed.

  35. Swine Operation Vulnerability Assessment

  36. Countermeasures Countermeasures are actions taken to shield vulnerable areas, reducing the risk of intentional contamination.

  37. Areas to Consider for Countermeasure Development • Procedures • Facility • Technology • Personnel

  38. Countermeasures for Procedures • Workforce • Shipping and Receiving • Visitors and Customers • Marketing

  39. Countermeasures for Facility • Light it • Lock it • Limit Access

  40. Writethe Plan • Develop a countermeasure to defend each vulnerable point identified as high risk. • Create a written plan including those countermeasures that are reasonable for the situation. • Identify the individual who will implement the countermeasure. • Set a timeline to implement the countermeasure.

  41. Swine Operation Food Defense Plan

  42. What if the Food Supply is Intentionally Contaminated? Should such an event occur a timely and efficient response will be critical to minimizing the damage.

  43. Develop a Written Response Plan • Plan for handling of contaminated animals • Emergency Planning • Facility Map • Emergency Contact Phone List • Visitor Log • Supplier/Customer Contacts • Employee Emergency Information

  44. Swine Operation Containment and Disposal Plan

  45. Handling of Contaminated Animals • First hold all potentially contaminated animals • Potentially contaminated animals will need to be quarantined prior to euthanasia. • Quarantine will need to be separate from non contaminated animals. • Prepare a plan for carcass disposal, to be reviewed by APHIS and state authorities in case of an intentional contamination.

  46. Facility Map • Name, address, and phone of owner/proprietor • Relationship of the facility to adjacent properties and/or structures. • Road access including transportation routes • Perimeter boundaries, include fences, and gates (with dimensions)

  47. Facility Map continued • Buildings, outbuildings, doors, windows, AC/heating, ventilation • Utilities (water, gas, electric, phones) location and shutoff • Septic System and drainage areas with direction of flow • Web sites such as Google Earth www.earth.google.com

  48. Water access AC

  49. Swine Operation Emergency Phone List

  50. Swine Operation Employee Emergency Contacts

More Related