1 / 13

5 th E-ICOLC Conference Elsinore, Denmark Country Report Germany

5 th E-ICOLC Conference Elsinore, Denmark Country Report Germany. Werner Reinhardt Siegen University Library and Chairman GASCO. http://lib.consortium.ch/. http://voeb.uibk.ac.at/konsortien/index.html. German, Austrian and Swiss Consortia Organisation.

jatin
Download Presentation

5 th E-ICOLC Conference Elsinore, Denmark Country Report Germany

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 5th E-ICOLC ConferenceElsinore, Denmark Country Report Germany Werner Reinhardt Siegen University Library and Chairman GASCO

  2. http://lib.consortium.ch/ http://voeb.uibk.ac.at/konsortien/index.html German, Austrian and Swiss Consortia Organisation http://www.hbz-nrw.de/kunden/gast/konsortien/konsortien.html

  3. States of the Federal Republic of Germany Siegen

  4. Some Statistical FiguresGermany / North Rhine-Westphalia • Universities (mostly state funded) 98NRW: 16 NRW: 15(2003 Merger of two Universities) • Students at these universities (FTE) 1.330.000NRW: 407.000 • Scientific staff (FTE) 172.000NRW: 35.000

  5. Cataloguing Cooperatives in Germany Joint library network (GBV) Library information system of HesseHeBIS Cooperative library network of Berlin-Brandenburg (KOBV) Bavarian library network (BVB) Library network of North Rhine-Westphalia (HBZ) South-West German library network(SWB)

  6. ACTIVE CONSORTIA • Baden-Württemberg • Bavaria • FAK • HeBIS • Lower Saxony • North-Rhine Westphalia

  7. Division of Labour (Examples) • FAK • ACS 43 (12) participants • LWW 20 ( 2) participants • HeBIS • ACM 30 (5) participants • NRW • Beck-Online 49 (15) participants • Managed by a single colleague • Nature 70 participantsScience 54 participants

  8. No funding or < 100.000 € Funding 100.000 – 500.000 € Funding ~ 1.000.000 € Funding > 1.500.000 € Central Funding for e-Content in Germany 2001 2002 2003

  9. Central Funding (Examples) - ? - ? nothing

  10. Archiving Questions Reason 1 Academic Press (merger with Elsevier)Reason 2 ACS (time frame licensing) Preferred option NO change of server Second best option Data delivery and storage on ONE server within Germany (Distributed Network) Second best option Use at other providers (OCLC) Third best option Data delivery to the single participants Worst option No access

  11. Resolution 2001 • No big deal (looking at „big“ publishers) • Surcharge to be paid Local collection development • Cancellation options Price increase (cap) NRW-ways to new licensing models Experiences so far: Elsevier, Kluwer Future target Usage based agreements

  12. Questions ?

More Related