1 / 10

Agenda for Today

Agenda for Today. final paper assignment participation online Davis argument key examples notes for next week social capital web design. Final Paper. Introduction/thesis statement Organizational structure Evidence Research Citations Conclusion. Online participation. Your ideas:

jayme
Download Presentation

Agenda for Today

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Agenda for Today final paper assignment participation online Davis argument key examples notes for next week social capital web design

  2. Final Paper Introduction/thesis statement Organizational structure Evidence Research Citations Conclusion

  3. Online participation Your ideas: Cost effects: convenience, barriers Benefit effects: opportunities, communities Null effects: hype, inequities

  4. Online participation: Davis • 3 types of potential benefits • Obstacles to increased participation • Implications for online politics • Conclusions

  5. Potential benefits • Citizen information • example: Neighborhood Knowledge Los Angeles • 2. Citizen-government interaction: • - example: Buckinghamshire citizen jury • 3. Policy-making impact: • - example: South Africa’s constitutional consultation

  6. Obstacles to participation • citizen choices • Internet user characteristics

  7. Implications for online politics • Dominant player advantage • a) organizational advantage • counter-example: Ventura • b) reliability advantage • - counter-example: Straight Goods • 2. Limited participation growth • - information pull, e.g. MyBC • - deliberation potential, e.g. Minnesota e-dem

  8. Conclusions • limitations vs. possibilities • technological determinism vs. policy effects

  9. Next week • what is “social capital”? Intro. to Putnam • cut Heywood/Lay reading • use time to prep for web design lab • choose Word or Composer

  10. Discussion

More Related