1 / 15

Expert group on delegated and implementing acts of 3 October 2013 Models of Joint Action Plans

Expert group on delegated and implementing acts of 3 October 2013 Models of Joint Action Plans (Art 95 CPR) 2 nd meeting. Purpose of the presentation. Present the main changes / "no changes" in the model of implementing act setting out a model of format for the Joint Action Plan.

jbeesley
Download Presentation

Expert group on delegated and implementing acts of 3 October 2013 Models of Joint Action Plans

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Expert group on delegated and implementing acts of 3 October 2013 Models of Joint Action Plans (Art 95 CPR) 2nd meeting

  2. Purpose of the presentation • Present the main changes / "no changes" in the model of implementing act setting out a model of format for the Joint Action Plan

  3. Model for a format of Joint Action Plan • Comments & proposals sent by 5 MSs (CZ, EE, HU, LT, PL) • - Most of them taken into account … with the exception of audit of public procurement • - clarifications in the Q&A

  4. Guidance part • - mainly wording issues • - details added on information of the COM on future JAPs (3 months / informal) • - bodies implementing the JAP • - approval of the JAP application by MA(s) • - date of submission of JAPs • - more details on intervention logic • - explanation of financial flexibility • - audit of public procurement: procedures but not the invoices • - eligible advances • - clarification on the criteria to assess amendment of a JAP and on the procedure

  5. B – Contact details • -> Reference to MAs approval

  6. C- Analysis of development needs and objectives • - better complementarity between C3 ("IP/SO supported by the JAP) and C4 (how the JAP will contribute to the SO of the IP) • - Addition of a table on contribution to the performance framework

  7. D – Framework of the JAP • - definition of projects / types of projects (sets of similar activities with the same indicators) • - mitigation measures against impact of external factors? • - details added on the representation of the intervention logic

  8. E- Geographic coverage and target group(s) • - formal improvements F- Expected implementation period • - deletion of detail of successive steps

  9. H- Implementing provisions • - Info on key partners (where appropriate) • - clarifications on administrative and financial management capacity, on information on financial corrections (10 yrs, >10 kEUR) • - deletion of the arrangements of the beneficiary to steer the JAP (overlap)

  10. J- Financial arrangements (1) • - financial flexibility: more detailed + new box • - euro conversion • - financial tables simplified (€ for financing plan)

  11. Annex on indicators used to reimburse the outputs and results • - formal changes

  12. Financial flexibility (1) 10% of allocations for indicators of the same type (output / result). No increase of the LS or UC, no transfer between outputs & results, no change of milestones Decision: Output 1: 100 € /10 people trained (UC 10€/pt) Output 2: 100 € / 100 people followed up (UC 1€/pf) Result 1: 100 € /10 people in employment after 3 months (UC 10€/pe) Final: 90 € for 9 people trained, 105 € (+5%) for 105 people followed up (Max 110/110) 100 € (capped) for 11 people in employment after 3 months.

  13. Financial flexibility (2) • Indicators of the same "substance" • Ex: UC = child occupying a place in a childcare service • - with an attendance rate > 70% = 100 € • - with an attendance rate > 30%, <70% = 50€ • - with an attendance rate < 30% = 0 €

  14. Audit issues • Audit of public procurement : focus on procedures, no audit of the amounts paid. • Necessary to keep this possibility = respect of applicable law can be verified

  15. Many thanks for your attentionQuestions? • Laurent SENS • laurent.sens@ec.europa.eu

More Related