1 / 8

Adaptation Funding

This presentation by Benito Müller discusses the importance of adaptation funding and presents estimates from the World Bank and NAPA-based calculations. It also explores the principles and governance structure of the Adaptation Fund, emphasizing the need for transparency and adequate financial support.

jbowlin
Download Presentation

Adaptation Funding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Adaptation Funding Presentation put together by Benito Müller at the ECBI Oxford Seminar 1 September 2006

  2. $18bn (C) $14bn $10bn (B) $6bn (A) $2bn LDC G77+Ch. non-Annex I Adaptation Funding Needs a) Investment-based Estimates (World Bank) Table K1. Preliminary Estimates of Annual Adaptation Costs in Developing Countries Source: World Bank Environmentally & Socially Sustainable Development and Infrastructure Vice Presidencies, ‘Clean Energy And Development: Towards An Investment Framework’ Development Committee (Joint Ministerial Committee of the Boards of Governors of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund on the Transfer of Real Resources to Developing Countries), Washington D.C./USA: 5 April 2006 b) NAPA-based Estimates (urgent and immediate needs) • Conservative/Average Extrapolations [for G77+China] • based on • NAPA costs per inhabitant [$2.4bn/$3.8bn] • NAPA costs per GDP [$5.4bn/$9.2bn], and • NAPA costs per land area impacted by human activity [$11.5bn/$15.3bn] Source: Benito Müller and Cameron Hepburn, ‘An “International Air Travel Adaptation Levy” (IATAL): Outline Proposal’ EV 36, Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, September 2006

  3. Multilateral/International Adaptation Funding Source: Benito Müller and Cameron Hepburn, ‘An “International Air Travel Adaptation Levy” (IATAL): Outline Proposal’ EV 36, Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, September 2006

  4. Operationalising the Adaptation Fund Presentation put together by Amjad Abdulla (Maldives), Haroldo de Oliveira Machado (Brazil), Bubu Pateh Jallow (The Gambia), Manjeev S Puri (India) on behalf of the the 2006 ECBI Oxford Fellows at the ECBI Oxford Seminar 1 September 2006

  5. Principles The decision making processes of the Adaptation Fund should be flexible, transparent and uncomplicated. They should be balanced and reflect the needs of the developing country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol. Funding should be reliable and adequate and on a full adaptation cost basis

  6. Governance Structure COP/MOP Executive Body is under the authority of COP/MOP Executive Body Trustee Technical Panel Secretariat (Regional Offices/Trustees) Implementing Agencies

  7. Governance: Executive Body Balanced representation 1 from each regional group (Africa, Asia & Pacific, Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America & Caribbean, Western Europe & Others) 1 LDC 2 Annex 1 2 non-Annex 1 1 AOSIS 11 Alternate members Decision making procedures Follow the example of JISC, CDMEB, Compliance commitee (Consensus, if not possible ¾ majority of the members present and voting)

  8. Eligibility Developing country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol are eligible for the funding from the Adaptation Fund to meet costs of adapting to climate change. Funding should be directed particularly to activities benefiting the most vulnerable communities

More Related