1 / 36

FAIR TRADING COMMISSION 6 th Annual Lecture

This lecture explores functions, formulas, and the role of fiction in future regulatory frameworks. Delve into adaptive challenges, economic incentives, renewable energy, and technical challenges in regulation with a focus on leadership in infrastructure policy development. Discover key issues like energy costs, environmental concerns, and the role of stakeholders in shaping regulatory systems for the next decade. Understand the importance of addressing changing energy policies, regulatory lag, and the impact of international agreements on infrastructure regulation. Join us to explore the evolving landscape of regulatory governance and the role of leadership in shaping adaptive regulatory frameworks for the future.

Download Presentation

FAIR TRADING COMMISSION 6 th Annual Lecture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FAIR TRADING COMMISSION6th Annual Lecture

  2. Functions, Formulas and FictionRegulation in the next 10 years Mark Jamison, Ph.D. Public Utility Research Center Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  3. Challenges in regulation Technical Adaptive Addressing adaptive challenges Regulatory system Addressing change in the system Outline Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 3

  4. Survey Which is most likely to become the driving issue for change in energy policies in Barbados? Environmental concerns Energy costs Technology change Dependability Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  5. Survey Which of the following, if increased 25 percent, would make the greatest impact for good regulation in Barbados? Independence of the FTC Business community assistance to FTC Consumer education Political oversight of FTC Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  6. Survey Which of the following represents the greatest energy challenge for Barbados in the next five years? Energy costs Smart grid Environmental regulations Efficient energy use Adapting to unforeseen circumstances Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  7. Technical Challenges in Regulation Rate reviews (accountants, economists, engineers, lawyers) Rate base (assets, depreciation, etc.) Cost of money (debt and equity costs, gearing, etc.) Disallowances (prudency, known and knowable, etc.) Public input (hearings, comments, etc.) Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  8. Interconnection arrangements (lawyers, engineers, economists) Contract design Evolution with next generation networks Cost studies Dispute resolution Technical Challenges in Regulation Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 8

  9. Economic incentives (economists, lawyers, accountants) Price cap design and review Earnings sharing Benchmarking Regulatory lag Technical Challenges in Regulation Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 9

  10. Renewable energy (engineers, biologists, economists, lawyers) Renewable portfolio standards Technical feasibility Economic feasibility Distributed generation interconnection and pricing Market structure Technical Challenges in Regulation Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 10

  11. Environmental regulations (environmental scientists, engineers, economists, lawyers) Standards setting Cap and trade Monitoring and enforcement Rate treatment of costs and revenue International agreements Technical Challenges in Regulation Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 11

  12. Telecommunications competition (economists, lawyers) Mix with regulation Competition assessment Impacts of technology change International impacts International agreements Technical Challenges in Regulation Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 12

  13. All require Technical sophistication Lawyers, engineers, financial analysts, accountants, economists, scientists, etc. That are well educated and well trained Analytically complex, but known Legal authority Legal processes Policy direction Technical Challenges in Regulation Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 13

  14. What performance is measured and monitored? What new incentives are in place? Whose investment is protected? Whose prices are protected? What experiments are in place? How are commitments honored? What would regulation look like if it were ready for these challenges? Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 14

  15. Regulation is more than technical challenges Renewable energy sources Who will bear the costs? What will be the new environmental challenges? New technologies Who will bear the risks? Whose jobs will be impacted? Political pressures Who will take political risks? Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  16. Economic incentives Will the government keep its commitments? International relations How should international pressures impact market, environmental, and price decisions? Competition Will the government tolerate dynamic markets? Regulation is more than technical challenges Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 16

  17. Technical vs. Adaptive Challenges Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  18. Addressing Adaptive Challenges “Trouble makers” surface the problem Dialogues to investigate and learn Experiments to test hypotheses Stakeholder engagement to distribute losses Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  19. Roles and relationships Authority, accountability, communication Clear, but experimental Three juxtapositions Next, not best Why, not what Leadership, not leading What would adaptive regulation look like? Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 19

  20. Regulatory Governance Model Relationships for Price Setting Quality Market Conduct Citizens Policy Makers Commissioners Regulatory Agency Operators Adapted from “The Imperfect Board Member” Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 20

  21. Regulatory Governance Model Citizens Policy Makers Commissioners Authority Regulatory Agency Operators Adapted from “The Imperfect Board Member” Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 21

  22. In general, higher level groups hold lower level groups accountable for results Without managing how results are achieved With consideration for circumstances Authority Scope Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 22

  23. Policy makers Reflect on outcomes What is the system supposed to produce? Why does it or why doesn’t it? Respect citizen expectations Long run and short run Select commissioners Define and refine vision and mission Evolving circumstances, but long-lived investments Authority Scope Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 23

  24. Authority Scope Regulators Establish prices, service standards, and market rules Enforce decisions Operators Determine means to achieve service vision subject to regulator decisions Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  25. Regulatory Governance Model Citizens Policy Makers Commissioners Accountability Authority Regulatory Agency Operators Adapted from “The Imperfect Board Member” Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 25

  26. Accountability for performance Operator rewarded/punished based on Costs and price performance Investment Service quality Regulator held accountable for sector performance and for system performance Prices and services Stakeholder engagement Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  27. Regulatory Governance Model Citizens Policy Makers Commissioners Accountability Communication Authority Regulatory Agency Operators Adapted from “The Imperfect Board Member” Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 27

  28. Communication Line Exceptions Within the context of the proper role Within the context of the proper role Citizens Policy Makers Impacts Explanations Commissioners Policy ideas and feedback Regulatory Agency Operators Adapted from “The Imperfect Board Member” Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 28

  29. Minority voices How are less powerful citizens heard? Formal vs. informal rules Formal rules only do so much How to honor informal agreements? Transparency Difficult conversations Challenges to the model Leadership in Infrastructure Policy 29

  30. How do we adapt our system? Change is a continuing condition: The future holds more unknowns than it does certainties. “Reset” means that we develop fresh perspectives and knowledge about the future, while holding in trust the wisdom of the past. 1. Focus on Next practices, not Best practices. 2. Focus on Whyrather than on What. 3. Focus on Leadership, not on Leading. (Mark Jamison and Araceli Castañeda, 2009) Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  31. 1. Next practices, not best practices Best practice is about imitation (following in someone else’s footsteps). A focus on next practice is needed when we are going into areas where no one has gone before. Heifetz, Grashow, and Linsky. 2009. “Leadership in a (Permanent) Crisis.” Harvard Business Review Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  32. 2. Focus on Why rather than on What When we ask ourselves “What should we do next?” we emphasize practice. But the practice needs a foundation, basic principles, and values. Ask “Why have certain practices or why have experiments been successful or unsuccessful?” so that we analyze our underlying priorities and our context. We learn, keep what is important, and discard what holds us back. Collins, 2009. How the Mighty Fall and Why Some Companies Never Give in Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  33. 3. Leadership vs. Leading A leader provides direction (when the right direction is already known). Leadership mobilizes people to tackle difficult and often ambiguous problems and circumstances. (Heifetz, Ronald A. 1994. Leadership Without Easy Answers, p. 15) Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  34. Reflection Consider your answers to… Driving issue for change Greatest impact for good regulation Greatest energy challenge for Barbados What is the most important thing for you to accomplish in 2010? Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  35. The Body of Knowledgeon Infrastructure Regulation www.regulationbodyofknowledge.org Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

  36. Thank you mark.jamison@warrington.ufl.edu +1.352.392.6148 http://www.purc.ufl.edu Leadership in Infrastructure Policy

More Related