1 / 24

Kosovo

Kosovo. Akane Wang Shiou An liang Emiri mizuo. KOSOVO FACTS: Capital – Pristina Ethnic C omposition – 92% Albanians 8% Sebs , Bosniaks, Gorani, Roma, Turks, Ashkali, Balkan Egyptians Official Languages – Albanian Serbian. Post World War 2. SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC. LDK & RUGOVA.

jenna
Download Presentation

Kosovo

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kosovo Akane Wang Shiou An liangEmirimizuo

  2. KOSOVO FACTS: • Capital – Pristina • Ethnic Composition – • 92% Albanians • 8% Sebs, Bosniaks, Gorani, Roma, Turks, Ashkali, Balkan Egyptians • Official Languages – • Albanian • Serbian

  3. Post World War 2

  4. SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC

  5. LDK & RUGOVA LDK led by Rugova: appealing to the international community through NON-VIOLENT acts • BUT Rugova’s non violent policies FAILED to win recognition at the Dayton Agreement

  6. Kosovo liberation army (kla)

  7. The Beginning • Turning Point!  March 5th1998, KLA Launched attack at DrenicaValley. 1998 March Clinton Administration: “we believe that in 1991, the international community stood by and watched ethnic cleansing in Bosnia.. We don’t want that to happen again this time”

  8. Reaction of Security Council • UNSC resolution 1160: • CHAPTER VII: “Threat to international peace and security”

  9. NATO Reaction • Turning Point! Serbian attack on Decani (May 1998) • -100,000 refugees fleeing Decani shocked Blair Administration • NATO: difficulties of going in • Do not want to support KLA’s attack against the Serbs • The scale of Serbian counterattack was too big • Will have to act without explicit SC authorization

  10. UN Resolution 1199 (September1998) • Demanded a FRY and KLA ceasefire • Legally binding under Chapter 7 • not backed with military actions or sanctions

  11. NATO Activation

  12. October Agreement

  13. Resolution 1203: demanded FRY to comply with the previous resolution and cooperate with the NATO and OSCE verification mission

  14. Rambouillet and Paris Negotiation’s failure • Turning Point! : • KLAcontinued to attack, massacre of Racak • (January 15, 1999) • Rambouillet talk: failed • A three-year transitional period • Substantial autonomy, own police force, jurisdiction, and assembly. • Limited FRY security and NATO led international force. • Paris talk: failed

  15. NATO Action

  16. NATOAirstrike: Four Justification

  17. 2 Main Reason of UsingAir Force

  18. But….

  19. End of War • June 3rd EU-Russia Peace plan implemented • 3 reasons: • Terms: withdraw of all Serb forces; deployment of NATO led multinational force KFOR.

  20. NATO Action – Fail Points • 1. Prevention is better than solution • 2. Negotiated with FRY with unacceptable terms • 3. The choice of means • 4. Failed to protect Serbians in Kosovo after the war

  21. Current Situation

  22. Evaluation 5 4 3 2 4 5 1 2 • Supreme humanitarian emergency • Necessity/ Last resort • Positive humanitarian outcome • Proportionality • Humanitarian Motive • Humanitarian justification • Legality • Selectivity

  23. References

More Related