1 / 21

Causation

Causation. Learning Objectives To be able to discuss Different Theories of causation Causation in Infectious vs. Chronic Disease Modern view of causation. Jay M. Fleisher MS, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Nova Southeastern University Studied at:

jennifercampbell
Download Presentation

Causation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Causation Learning Objectives To be able to discuss Different Theories of causation Causation in Infectious vs. Chronic Disease Modern view of causation

  2. Jay M. Fleisher MS, Ph.D. • Associate Professor, Nova Southeastern University • Studied at: • Columbia University School of Public Health MS Epidemiology • NYU Ph.D. Environmental Epidemiology/Biostatistics

  3. Causation • Two types of medical research • Bench work • Epidemiology • Bench work usually describes the underlying biology of disease • Epidemiology either tests the results of bench work on human populations or provides input to the biomedical scientist on what we still do not know

  4. What does the term “ Causal” really mean?

  5. Example #1 - HIV and AIDS • Epidemiology identifies new disease caused by defect in immune system • Bench science identifies the infectious agent • Epidemiological studies confirm that agent causes disease in humans • Causation is proven

  6. Example #2 - What Causes an MI • Epidemiological studies combined with laboratory study identify risk factors • Cigarette smoking • Cholesterol • Elevated blood pressure • Stress • Family history • Obesity • Etc • Which of the above contribute the most risk • What are the relationships between risk factors

  7. Therefore: • The issue of causation is not as simple as it first appears • Thus, the need for a unifying concept of causation

  8. A Unifying Model of Causal Relationships

  9. The 2 Components: • Sufficient Cause • precedes the disease • if the cause is present, the disease always occurs • Necessary Cause • precedes the disease • if the cause is absent, the disease cannot occur

  10. The 4 Models of Causal Relationships

  11. 1. Necessary and Sufficient* Disease Only Factor A Sickle Cell Anemia Genetic factors * RARELY OCCUR

  12. 2. Necessary but Not Sufficient Factor A + Factor B Disease + Factor C

  13. 2. Necessary but Not Sufficient - Example Initiation + Latent Period Cancer + Promoter

  14. 3. Sufficient but Not Necessary Factor A Factor B Disease Factor C

  15. 3. Sufficient but Not Necessary - Example Ionizing Radiation or Benzene Leukemia or Electromagnetic Fields?

  16. 4. Neither Sufficient Nor Necessary Factor A + Factor B and/or + Disease Factor C Factor D and/or + Factor E Factor F

  17. 4. Neither Sufficient Nor Necessary - Example Smoking + Cholesterol and/or + MI HBP Fam. History and/or + Stress Obesity

  18. Therefore: • Concept of Necessary vs. Sufficient Causes provides a theoretical framework for causation of all disease • How do we actually assess whether a Risk Factor is indeed Causal

  19. Criteria for Assessing Causation • Temporal relationship • Exposure precedes the disease • Strength of the Association • Measured by the Relative Risk ( either the Rate Ratio or the Odds Ratio) • Dose-response Relationship • As the dose of exposure increases the risk of disease also increases • Example: Cigarette Smoking and Lung Ca • Replication of the Findings • Results replicated in other studies • Biologic plausibility • Does the association fit with what we know about the underlying biology • Sometimes we know little or nothing about the undelieing biology ( “Black Box” epidemiology • Consistency • Alternative explanation eliminated • Cessation effects • Specificity of the Association • Dose-response

  20. Criteria for Assessing Causation • Biologic plausibility • Does the association fit with what we know about the underlying biology • Sometimes we know little or nothing about the underlying biology ( “Black Box” epidemiology) • Example – Asbestosis and Lung Ca.. Only have theory of mechanism • Consideration of Alternate Explanations • If knowledge exists, rule out or make sure studies took into account • Cessation of Exposure • If exposure is reduced or eliminated Risk will decline • Example Ex-Smokers • Specificity of the Association • A specific agent is associated with only 1 disease • OK for infectious agents but falls apart with many Risk Factors for Chronic Illness • Example: Cigarette Smoking associated with several diseases

  21. Relevant Web Sites • http://www.defendingscience.org/sites/default/files/upload/Rothman-Greenland.pdf • http://www.facmed.unam.mx/deptos/salud/censenanza/spiii/spiii/rothman.pdf

More Related