290 likes | 536 Views
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." ~ Albert Einstein . Qualitative Research - Definition. Qualitative research is a loosely defined category of research designs or models, all of which elicit verbal, visual, tactile, olfactory, and gustatory data in the form of descriptive narratives like field notes, recordings, or other transcriptions from audio- and videotapes and other written records and pictures or films.".
E N D
1. A Look at Qualitative Research“Encounters with the OPAC: On-Line Searching in Public Libraries” by Debra J. Slone
2. “ Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.”
~ Albert Einstein
3. Qualitative Research - Definition “Qualitative research is a loosely defined category of research designs or models, all of which elicit verbal, visual, tactile, olfactory, and gustatory data in the form of descriptive narratives like field notes, recordings, or other transcriptions from audio- and videotapes and other written records and pictures or films.”
4. Qualitative Research
Accepts bias and realizes existing knowledge
Attempts to minimize preconceived ideas about the outcomes
Patterns emerge from collected data “Unlike conventional“Unlike conventional
5. Rationale for Qualitative Research Preference and/or expertise of the researcher
Nature of the research problem
Gain understanding of underlying reasons and motivations
Uncover prevalent trends in thought and opinion
Provide insights into the setting of a problem, generating ideas and/or hypothesis for later quantitative research
6. Encounters with the OPAC “This article reports on a qualitative study exploring:
strategies and behaviors of public library users during interaction with an on-line public access catalog; and
(2) users’ confidence in finding information on-line.” Verbal segue - - Tell everyone that the study is used to exemplify qualitative research. With each point we will look at how the article addresses each point.Verbal segue - - Tell everyone that the study is used to exemplify qualitative research. With each point we will look at how the article addresses each point.
7. Introduction ~ Qualitative Study Researcher’s reason for doing the study
Need for study in the field
Intended audience
Research product
Literature Review Say first - - “Unlike conventional, positivist research, there is no single accepted outline for a qualitative research proposal or report (Morse, 1991).” We will be using the study as a guide while presenting the characteristics of Qualitative studies. Say first - - “Unlike conventional, positivist research, there is no single accepted outline for a qualitative research proposal or report (Morse, 1991).” We will be using the study as a guide while presenting the characteristics of Qualitative studies.
8. Introduction ~ OPAC Study Analyze human interaction with a public library OPAC
Known-item, unknown-item, & area searches and public library user confidence
Public library professionals & academics
Journal article & resource for OPAC designers
Literature Review ~ very thorough
9. Research Question ~ Qualitative Study Identify the type of research being used for those who do not work with qualitative research often.
States the goals of study in the form of a question.
10. Research Question ~ OPAC Study “As is typical of qualitative studies, this one allows room for participants to ‘tell their story.’”
“The questions, therefore, served primarily as starting points for the researcher.”
11. OPAC study research questions “(1) what behaviors and strategies do users employ to make use of the Dynix system at Wake County (Raleigh, NC) Library?
(2) Are users confident in finding the information they want using an OPAC?”
12. Methodology ~ Qualitative Study Describe the following:
Participant selection and confidentiality procedures
Researcher relationship to the participants
Kinds of data to collect & collection procedures
Potential for research procedure evolution
13. Methodology ~ OPAC Study Library during busy hours, 32 out of 38 participated; confidentiality ensured through enumeration
Researcher is mostly an observer, yet interaction does occur
Types of data collection used: questionnaires, and interviews & observations recorded on a log sheet
Slightly addressed within interview context
14. Analysis & Results ~ Qualitative Study Non-statistical ~ language oriented
Describing regularities
Meanings of actions or text
Reflective methods
15. Analysis & Results ~ OPAC Study Participants
OPAC experience – Table 1
Search types – Table 2
Feelings – Table 3 - Table 4 – Table 5
Strategies and behaviors – Table 6
Search patterns by search type
16. Discussion ~ OPAC Study Strategies and behaviors
Unknown-item searching
Formulated query, searched, re-formulated
Area searches
Viewed a few records to assist browsing
Known-item searches
Knew what they wanted – searched for that item
17. Discussion ~ OPAC Study Confidence and other feelings
Unknown-item searching
Least confident, most frustrated
Area searches
Most confident – several stood when searching
Known-item searches
Very confident
18. Limitations of the Study ~ OPAC Study Small sample of users
Questionnaire – Mixed results
Subjectivity of the designations for emotions
Obtrusive nature of the observational and interview methods Two reasons about the questionnaire – 1. Method of collection proved ineffective in soliciting info about length of time user thought about a problem in forming a search strategy. 2. Questions about user confidence was possibly biased or inaccurate of their performance behavior Two reasons about the questionnaire – 1. Method of collection proved ineffective in soliciting info about length of time user thought about a problem in forming a search strategy. 2. Questions about user confidence was possibly biased or inaccurate of their performance behavior
19. Conclusions & Implications ~ OPAC Study More insight about “area searches” as a distinct type of search is needed
Interfaces incorporating individual differences in searching by public library users should be considered
Bibliographic instruction, indexing and cataloging methods may need to be altered
Communication between people and information retrieval systems needs to be continually addressed
20. Acknowledgements & References OPAC Study Study acknowledges those who had a great impact on the study and writing the paper.
Paul Solomon
Barbara Wildemuth
Wake County Librarians
Wake County Library Users
Seminal works in the field
Works include – Belkin, Dervin, Kuhlthau, Marchonini, Solomon, Taylor, Wildemuth, and othersWorks include – Belkin, Dervin, Kuhlthau, Marchonini, Solomon, Taylor, Wildemuth, and others
21. Evaluation of OPAC Study Exemplary of qualitative research
Clear methodology
Good use of tables to present findings
Usable data
Characteristics of subjects were not made clear (computer experience, education, etc.)
Sherbet dish???
23. Log Sheet Back to slide
24. Questionnaire Back to slide
25. Table 1 Back to slide
26. Table 2 Back to slide
27. Table 3 Back to slide
28. Table 4 Back to slide
29. Table 5 Back to slide
30. Table 6 Back to slide