1 / 20

Inflation : why and how ?

Inflation : why and how ?. Gert Jan Hoeve, December 2012. Problems with the Hot Big Bang. Flatness | Ω -1|<10 16 at nucleosythesis Unwanted relics Horizon problem Homogeneity over parts of space that are presumably not causally correlated . Baryogenesis

Download Presentation

Inflation : why and how ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Inflation: whyandhow? Gert Jan Hoeve, December 2012

  2. Problemswith the Hot Big Bang • Flatness • |Ω-1|<1016 at nucleosythesis • Unwantedrelics • Horizon problem • Homogeneity over parts of spacethat are presumablynotcausallycorrelated. • Baryogenesis • Conventionaltheories of symmetrybreaking are insufficientfor the observedammount of baryons

  3. The solution: inflation d2a/dt2 >> 0 or equivalently, -(dH/dt)/H2 >> 1 Between Planck time (10-43) andGUT decoupling (10-35) Alan Guth, 1981 Picture: Wikipedia

  4. How does cosmicinflationsolve the flatnessproblem? • Ω is pushedtowards 1 duringinflation • ‘Stretching’

  5. Unwantedrelics: magneticmonopoles • Abundant at high temperature • Slow decay

  6. Why do we have a horizon problem? • Cosmic Microwave Background radiationoriginated 500,000 yearsafter the BB. • No causalcorrelationpossible

  7. Inflationsolves the horizon problem: Picture: one minute astronomer

  8. How muchinflation do we need? Inflationends at t0 = 10-35 s, we are at t1 = 1017 s In radiationdominateduniverse |Ω-1|proportional to time |Ωnow-1| ≤ 10-2 |ΩGUT-1|≤ 10-54 Recall|Ω-1|=|k|/(Ha)2 Duringinflation H=constant, so|Ω-1|proportional to 1/a2 Total expansion > ~ 1027

  9. Baryogenesis • Three conditions (Sakharov’sconditions) • Baryon numberviolatinginteractions • obvious • C violationand CP violation • Becauseany B-violatinginteractionwouldbemirroredby a complementaryinteraction • Thermal non-equilibrium (or CPT violation) • Otherwise the backwardsreactionwouldbeequilly strong

  10. B-violatinginteractions • Standard model: sphalerons • Differenceleptonnumber andbaryonnumerconserved • Example: (u+u+d)+(c+c+s)+(t+t+b)  e++μ++τ+

  11. C and CP violation • B-violatingprocess must outratesymmetricprocess • Both symmetries must beviolated

  12. Thermal non-equilibrium at baryogenesis • Phasetransitionbubbles • Thermal energy gradient at bubbleedge • Local breakdown of time symmetry

  13. How didinflationarise? Scalar field V(φ) causesspontaneoussymmetrybreaking First or second order phasetransition? B. Clauwens , R. Jeanerot, D-term inflationafterspontaneoussymmetrybreaking H. Bohringer

  14. Original model (Guth, 1981) • False/real vacuum • First order phasetransition • Reheatingproblems

  15. Slow-rollinflation (Linde, 1982) • d2φ/dt2 + 3H dφ/dt = -dV(φ)/dφ • Friedman H2 = (1/2 dφ/dt+V(φ))/3 –k/a2 • Inflationdecays as slopeincreases • H=(da/dt)/a

  16. Quintessentialscalar field • 5th fundamental force • Continueousdecayingscalar field • Couldexplaininflationanddark energy at the same time! • M. Trodden, Baryogenesisand the new cosmology, 2002

  17. Conclusion Cosmologicalinflation is a viable hypothesis, but in desperate need of a more solid foundation (and experimental confirmation) from the realm of particle physics.

More Related