1 / 8

A Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Multimedia Learning Resources

A Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Multimedia Learning Resources. Leacock, T. L., & Nesbit, J. C. (2007). A framework for evaluating the quality of multimedia learning resources. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (2), 44-59. Abstract (1). 研究主題

jeremymoore
Download Presentation

A Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Multimedia Learning Resources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Multimedia Learning Resources Leacock, T. L., & Nesbit, J. C. (2007). A framework for evaluating the quality of multimedia learning resources. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 44-59.

  2. Abstract(1) • 研究主題 • Learning Object Review Instrument (LORI) • 研究動機 • The design of multimedia learning materials is not informed by relevant research in psychology and education • To mitigate search problem, resource repositories use quality metrics to order search results • 為了降低搜尋時間，需要好的品質標準評鑑元件的品質等級 • Quality criteria for summative evaluations have the potential to driveimprovements in design practice • 因為學習者也可能是未來可能發展教學元件的設計者

  3. Abstract(2) • 研究主題的重要性 • Numberofreusabledigitallearningresourcesisrapidlyincreasing • The accelerating quantity and complexity of online resources is focusing attention on their inconsistent quality • Exhaustive and detailed instruments used to evaluate educationalsoftware packages may not be suitable for evaluating learning objects(LO較小且數量較多特性不同)

  4. LORI • Atoolforelicitingratingsandcommentsfromlearningresourceevaluators • ThespecificpurposeofLORIistosupportevaluationofmultimedialearningobjects • Useaspartoftheconvergentparticipationmodel • Broadlyinterpreteddimensionsintendedtosupportsummativediscourseofanobject’sstrengthsandweakness

  5. ItemsinLORI1.5(2004)

  6. Conclusion • 本研究具有實證研究以證明本工具可以幫助參與者具有教學設計以及發展的技能 • LORI在評量的深度以及耗費的時間上取得了平衡 • 啟發式方法(heuristicapproach)幫助有經驗的設計者或是學習元件的使用者都可以有效的使用這個工具

  7. END

More Related