1 / 9

THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT

THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT . MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President. What is the PRR?. Major accreditation event 5 years after self study Retrospective, current, and prospective analysis Evidence of ongoing compliance with:

jerzy
Download Presentation

THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President

  2. What is the PRR? • Major accreditation event • 5 years after self study • Retrospective, current, and prospective analysis • Evidence of ongoing compliance with: • Title IV HEOA regulations (see Certification Statement) • Requirements of Affiliation • Standards for Accreditation

  3. Major sections of the PRR • Executive summary • Response to all self study recommendations • Major challenges/opportunities • Enrollment & financial data • Assessment evidence • Planning & budgeting

  4. Peer review procedures • 2 peer reviewers, 1 financial reviewer • Suggestions – collegial advice • Recommendations – improvement advised to remain in compliance • Requirements – institution is out of compliance with 1 or more Standards • Institution has an opportunity to provide a formal response

  5. Possible Commission actions • Reaffirm accreditation • sometimes with commendation • Request follow-up • progress report or monitoring report • Warning • Probation • Postponement

  6. What happened during the 2011 PRR review? • 51 institutions submitted PRRs • 44 affirmed • 18 commendations • 11 progress reports (22% of institutions) • 12 monitoring reports (24% of institutions) • 5 Warnings; 1 Probation; 1 Postponement

  7. Standards requiring the most follow-up • Standard 14: Assessment of Student Learning (76% of follow-up requests) • Standard 7: Institutional Assessment (40% of follow-up requests) • Standard 3: Institutional Resources (24% of follow-up requests) • Standard 8: Student Admissions and Retention (16% of follow-up requests)

  8. Need Assistance? • PRR Workshop – every Spring • Handbook for Periodic Review Reports, 12th edition, 2011; available at www.msche.org • Contact your MSCHE liaison

  9. QUESTIONS?

More Related