90 likes | 181 Views
CSEPs Update. Chris Warner. Background. Review Group 0157 Incremental Improvements (eg: UNC Modifications 0167, 0180V, 0200) Ofgem CSEP Group Long term options (options 1, 2, 3) Incremental improvements (option 4) SPAA iGT Single Service Provision Scoping Group Development of Option 3.
E N D
CSEPs Update Chris Warner
Background • Review Group 0157 • Incremental Improvements (eg: UNC Modifications 0167, 0180V, 0200) • Ofgem CSEP Group • Long term options (options 1, 2, 3) • Incremental improvements (option 4) • SPAA iGT Single Service Provision Scoping Group • Development of Option 3
Ofgem CSEP Group – Incremental improvements (option 4) • Change Order 1216 • Issue: • date of registration in DNO Settlement Systems does not match that within iGT Supply Point Register • results in Supply Point mis-match • Resolution: • DNOs to allow registration in their Settlement Systems earlier in the connection process • enables co-ordination of iGT and DNO start dates where notification received from the iGT • Implementation: • Scheduled for 1 October 2009
Ofgem CSEP Group – Incremental improvements (option 4) • UNC Modification 0226 / Change Order 1262 • Issue: • DNO unable to match iGT’s first LMN request to the DNO authorised connection (disconnect between engineering and commercial processes) • lack of nested CSEP data • results in Supply Point mis-match • Resolution: • iGT obligation to provide DNO reference number in LMN requests • DNO ability to receive and process data issued from nesting iGTs • Implementation: • Scheduled for 1 October 2009 • Dependency: • iGT UNC obligation for ‘lead’ iGT to issue relevant DNO reference to all nesting iGTs and for nesting iGT to issue relevant data to DNOs
Ofgem CSEP Group – Incremental improvements (option 4) • Reconciliation • Implementation of change requests 1216 / 1262 and UNC Modification 0226 seek to address prospective registration activity • There is pre existing issue with a mismatch in iGT and DNO Settlement information • The key to the successful implementation of the changes is therefore the conduct of an exercise at implementation to reconcile all relevant portfolio information in DNO and iGT systems • Implementation plan will make provision for this
SPAA iGT Single Service Provision Scoping Group (1) • SSP • The CSEP NExA Governance group has discussed data quality issues between iGT’s and GDN’s. • This group has discussed a number of models to eradicate the incorrect gas allocation issue and those challenges faced by shippers and suppliers as a result of iGT’s varying approaches to Supply Point Administration and AQ Review. • As a result the SSP project has been set up by the SPAA Executive Committee to deliver the procurement of a single service provider for Independent Gas Transporters.
SPAA iGT Single Service Provision Scoping Group (2) • Progress so far • Cost Analysis • Comments Matrix • Alternative Options • Project plan for completion end 2012 • Recommendations Report to SPAA EC in May 2009
SPAA iGT Single Service Provision Scoping Group (3) • SSP Issues and Benefits • Issues • Requires licence changes for either the Suppliers or the Transporters to ensure compliance • Funding • Benefits • Provide more timely and accurate data exchange between DN’s and iGT’s • Potential for reduced costs