1 / 4

National Academy Panel Evaluation of MPAR Planning Process

National Academy Panel Evaluation of MPAR Planning Process. Paul L. Smith, Chair (Professor, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology) Steven Rutledge (Professor, Colorado State University) Marilyn Wolfson (Research Scientist, MIT Lincoln Lab) Bob Serafin (Director Emeritus, NCAR)

jihan
Download Presentation

National Academy Panel Evaluation of MPAR Planning Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Academy Panel Evaluation of MPAR Planning Process Paul L. Smith, Chair (Professor, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology) Steven Rutledge (Professor, Colorado State University) Marilyn Wolfson (Research Scientist, MIT Lincoln Lab) Bob Serafin (Director Emeritus, NCAR) Dave McLaughlin (University of Massachusetts) Robert Palmer (Professor, University of Oklahoma) Eastwood Im (Research Scientist, Jet Propulsion Laboratory) Scott Sandgathe (Research Scientist, University of Washington) Jim Davis (Senior Engineer, The Aerospace Corporation) Curtis Marshall (Executive Secretary)

  2. National Academy Panel Evaluation of MPAR Planning Process • Provide an independent assessment on the OFCM-sponsored report, Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Phased Array Radar (2006), and follow-on work in four areas: • Analysis of current and future Federal agency needs that • can be met by a domestic ground radar system • Description of potential benefits that can be realized from • MPAR technology in meeting these needs • Proposed R&D plan to evaluate MPAR options • Preliminary cost analysis for MPAR

  3. National Academy Panel Evaluation of MPAR Planning Process Initial Meeting 14 January 10:00 A.M. Welcome and introductions --Paul Smith, Chair10:15 A.M. Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research -- Sam Williamson, Mark Weadon, Mark Welshinger 11:30 A.M. Overview of Phased Array Radar Technology --Merrill Skolnik, NRL12:30 P.M. Working Lunch – Continued Discussion1:15 P.M. Meteorological Applications of MPAR --Dusan Zrnic, NOAA/NSSL2:15 P.M. Aviation Applications of MPAR -- William Benner, FAA3:15 P.M. Break 3:30 P.M. Private Sector Developments --Michael Sarcione, RaytheonTimothy Ehret; Lockheed Martin4:30 P.M. Discussion and Comments

  4. National Academy Panel Evaluation of MPAR Planning Process Initial Meeting 14 January • Thematic Questions -- How are requirements being addressed? How quantified? • -- Has boundary layer coverage from the 334 notional MPARs been • quantified? • -- What impact does sensor failure have on various missions covered by • an MPAR? (i.e. multiple missions means impact is proportionally • greater from failure of a single unit) • -- Is there a need for more than one type of MPAR radar? • -- What does “graceful degradation” really mean, and how is it • quantified? (need MTBF data; failure analysis of current PARs) • -- Has the $10M per MPAR unit price estimate considered the • considerable cost of software development (i.e. total cost of system • may be far more than simply the sum of its components) • - “Where’s the beef”—urgent need for far more engineering rigor than • shown in the JAG report

More Related