60 likes | 210 Views
FESAC Planning Panel. Third Meeting PPPL August 7-9, 2007. From Charge by Under Secretary Orbach. “To assist planning for the ITER era, it is critical that FESAC identify the issues arising in a path to DEMO, with ITER as a central part of that effort”
E N D
FESAC Planning Panel Third Meeting PPPL August 7-9, 2007
From Charge by Under Secretary Orbach “To assist planning for the ITER era, it is critical that FESAC identify the issues arising in a path to DEMO, with ITER as a central part of that effort” • “Identify and prioritize the broad scientific and technical questions to be answered prior to a DEMO.” • “Assess available means (inventory), including all existing and planned facilities around the world, as well as theory and modeling, to address these questions.” • “Identify research gaps and how they may be addressed through new facility concepts, theory and modeling.”
Discussion of Charge • We can’t predict the specific implementation for DEMO so we take a broad view. • Electricity producing, demonstration power plant • High gain • High availability and reliability • Demonstration of all relevant technologies • DEMO and the development path drive the time line and help define needs – but we are not charged with producing a roadmap or a (new) complete development plan. • Note: our work is especially important in informing decisions for the next step(s) the program may take. • We aren’t reviewing or recommending specific facilities • The context is international, but US leadership is desired
The Panel’s Job • Identify issues that must be addressed to create knowledge base for DEMO • How do we define a “basis” set of “broad” questions and issues? • Prioritize these issues • What are the criteria we should be using? • Inventory available means – in current and planned programs • What will these programs actually do? • Identify critical paths and gaps • Where are we headed? What will DEMO be? • Identify opportunities - how the gaps may be filled • How to synthesize from all of the above?
Agenda For This Morning 08:30 - 08:50 Greenwald - Welcome and review of charge 08:50 - 09:20 Kurtz - Challenges for Demo Materials Development 09:20 - 09:40 Whyte - First wall issues 09:40 - 10:00 Skinner/Gentile - Tritium retention and dust 10:00 - 10:20 Ruzic - The Case for Liquid Lithium 10:20 - 10:40 Zakharov - Li wall fusion 10:40 - 11:00 Break 11:00 - 11:20 Raman - Requirements for an Advanced Fueling System 11:20 - 11:40 Ono - An ST Fusion Development Path 11:40 - 12:00 Boozer - Quasi-axisymmetric Extensions 12:00 - 12:20 Lyon - Compact Stellarator Approach to Demo 12:20 - 1:30 Lunch
Agenda For This Afternoon 12:20 - 1:30 Lunch 1:30 - 1:50 Phillips - RF Heating and Current Drive Issues for Demo 1:50 - 2:10 Wukitch/Porkolab - RF Heating and Current Drive Systems 2:10 - 2:30 Bonoli - Input on Steady State Issues for Demo 2:30 - 2:50 Friedberg - Fission/fusion hybrids 2:50 - 3:10 Dean - Paths to a Fusion Demo 3:10 - 3:30 Break 3:30 - 3:50 Burgess - Remote handling 3:50 - 4:10 Morley - Blankets and divertors 4:10 - 4:30 Jarboe - A case for a facility to rapidly advance the CT concept 4:30 - 4:50 Fu/Gorelenkov - Energetic Particle Physics in Burning Plasmas 4:50 - 5:10 Hahm Outstanding Issues in Transport Physics 5:10 - 5:30 Peng - Nuclear Component Testing issues 5:30 - 5:50 Goldston - Implications of the fusion development path study