70 likes | 303 Views
Report on Progress of ISSI Architectures (PSAWG/06-070). T. Hengeveld, PSAWG Chair Denver, CO, June 2006. Status vs San Diago Schedule. Supplementary Data Architecture. Architecture Completed on Schedule
E N D
Report on Progress of ISSI Architectures (PSAWG/06-070) T. Hengeveld, PSAWG Chair Denver, CO, June 2006
Supplementary Data Architecture • Architecture Completed on Schedule • Draft Complete Late, but is now available for Review in ISSI TG (subject to today’s votes) • M&P Completion Date of 20-Aug won’t happen • Motion Requested: That document number PSAWG/06-035-R4 be forwarded through STG and APIC to the ISSI TG for the development of messages and procedures and such modifications to the architecture section as may be required.
Console ISSI Architecture • Architecture Completed on Schedule • M&P Draft available for Formulating TG (CITG?) today subject to vote • Motion Requested: That document number PSAWG/06-046-R3 be forwarded through STG and APIC to the CITG for the development of messages and procedures and such modifications to the architecture section as may be required.
Conventional ISSI Architecture • Architecture Draft 2-weeks Late • Comment period closed without comments, but … • M/A-COM Intends to Comment • Does anyone else intend to comment? • Planned completion (architecture) approx. 30-Aug
Packet Data/ OTAR • EADS/Nortel Networks Proposal • Mobile IPv4 Based Architecture, IP tunnelled to the Home RFSS • Architecture Draft Delivered on (revised) Schedule • Comment Period now Closed, Comment resolution to begin • Motorola, Lucent and M/A-COM have commented on EADS proposal • Motorola has presented slides on radically different architecture • SNDCP tunnelled to the Home RFSS • EADS and Lucent have commented on Motorola presentation • See working meetings report
Summary • Supplementary Data is behind schedule, but should be completed this year. • ISSI Support for the Console I/F, which is also (by agreement in San Diago) the Console I/F, is on schedule and should be completed this year. • ISSI Conventional Support doesn’t seem to be generating a whole lot of interest, and is slightly behind schedule. May be able to be completed this year. • Packet Data/OTAR support is well behind schedule (through no fault of the editors), due, the chair believes, to a lack of concensus on the overall approach, and is at risk of not being completed this year.