210 likes | 343 Views
Cultures of Colonialism (F8030) Prof. Alan Lester. J. R. Seely, The Expansion of England , 1883, p. 13:. ‘The history of England was not in England but in America and Asia’. Four Foundations of Empire (Darwin 2009). Britain’s industrial economy (coal)
E N D
J. R. Seely, The Expansion of England, 1883, p. 13: ‘The history of England was not in England but in America and Asia’
Four Foundations of Empire (Darwin 2009) • Britain’s industrial economy (coal) • The City of London’s financial service reach: shipping insurance, harbour, railway, telegraph dividends etc. • India: powerhouse of Asia, rent, military might and reach. • The settler colonies/Dominions: Australia, New Zealand, Canada, South Africa – imports and exports, military strength, finance.
Traditional Imperial History: The Causes of Expansion Robinson and Gallagher: • Informal imperialism preferred • Peripheral crises and intervention • The ‘official mind’ • Collaborators
Marxists: industrial capitalism and crises of accumulation
Cain and Hopkins: gentlemanly capitalists
Postcolonial Approaches to Empire: Said Postcolonial studies in English and Imperial History’s rejection
Said’s Orientalism: Imperialism about culture as much as politics and economics The western self and the oriental other: mutually constituted Binary opposites: civilization/savagery; enlightened/ignorant, rational/irrational; democratic/despotic; elevation of women/oppression of women etc.
Colonial discourse and the geographical imagination: past and present
Postcolonial Approaches to Empire: Bhabha and Spivak Bhabha: critiquing Said’s binaries: • Ambivalence • Hybridity • Mimicry
Spivak: Can the subaltern speak? The example of sati
Critiques of Postcolonial Theory i) Critiques of Said: Marxists, Historians, postcolonial admirers ii) Critiques of Bhabha: obtuse, but generalisable iii) Critiques of Spivak: • powerlessness and political inaction • the alternatives of oral history and ‘reading against the grain’ iv) Critiques of postcolonialism as a whole from ‘atheoretical’ imperial historians
The ‘New’ Imperial History The best of both worlds: Culture and identity as well as politics and economics Empirical attention to place and period as well as theoretical generalisation British History and Imperial History: inextricable
Example: Hall on Jamaica and Britain The making of ‘race’, class and gender The politics of inclusion and exclusion The making of masculinities and femininities
The Cape and Britain: projects, discourses and networks: • Governmentality • Humanitarianism • Settler capitalism
How settlers ‘won’: • Free trade and self-government • Resistance and public opinion in Britain • Scientific racism • The ‘failure’ of emancipation • The consolidation of the middle classes ‘at home’
American Empire • i) Ferguson: how Britain gave up its empire in the interests of the world, and the USA took over its civilizing mission? • ii) American imperialism and its differences • iii) The neoconservative project and the radical critique: • Harvey and Smith: the geopolitics of oil • Gregory: colonial discourses in the present
The Uses of Britain’s History i) Ferguson’s appeal to the USA ii) Gregory: colonial Amnesia and nostalgia - in Britain iii) ‘Race’ and postcolonial Britain