1 / 27

Final Political Conference

Join us for the Final Political Conference, where we will discuss project results, common strategies, joint projects, and future models of cooperation among regions in the Adria-Alpe-Pannonia space. Hear from highest political representatives and participate in concluding discussions. Welcome to Benvenuti Willkommen Üdvözöljük Dobrodošli Dobro.došli!

jkinch
Download Presentation

Final Political Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Final Political Conference Final Political Conference • 10:00 Project Workshops • Innocluster • SUSEN • Bio.pan.alpe.adria.pannonia • NAT-REG

  2. Final Political Conference Final Political Conference • 14:00 Opening • Project results • Common strategies • Joint projects • Future Model of co-operations • Statements • Highest political representatives • Conclusions

  3. Welcome toBenvenuti Willkommen Üdvözöljük DobrodošliDobro došli MAnagement Tools, effective Relations for newInterregional Organisation aimed at Strengthening the Cooperation Among regions in the Adria-Alpe-Pannonia space.

  4. MATRIOSCA-AAP Management Board Zoltan Horvath, Baranya – Barbara Kerner, Baranya – Réka Kata Szabo, Baranya – Andras Szilagyi, Baranya – Dr. Heinrich Wedral, Burgenland – Mag (FH) Daniela Schuster, Burgenland – Dr. Wolfgang Platzer, Carinthia – Dr. Johannes Maier, Carinthia – Dr. Francesco Forte, Friuli-Venezia Giulia – Dr. Elisabetta Reja, Friuli-Venezia Giulia – Giorgio Tessarolo, Friuli-Venezia Giulia – Mátyás Firtl, Györ-Moson- Sopron – Dr. Manuela Hrvatin, Istria – Vesna Pribeg, Koprivnica – Krizevci – Ivo Piry, Slovenia – Tatjana Rener, Slovenia – Dezsö Frank, Somogy – Mag. Ludwig Rader, Styria – Maria Elßer-Eibel, Styria – Stefan Börger, Styria – Lidia Istlstekker, Tolna – Dr. Sandor Molnár, Tolna – Silvija Ladić, Varaždin – Andrea Vugrinović, Varaždin – Judit Bánovits, Vas – dott.ssa. Benedetta Pricolo, Veneto – dott. Diego Vecchiato, Veneto – Predrag Novikov, Vojvodina – Sandor Kasza, Zala – Eugenio Ambrosi, Friuli-Venezia Giulia – Primož Ilešič, Slovenija – Karoly Adam, Vas – Enrico Sunseri, Veneto – Marietta Pinter, Zala – Dr. Imre Boros, Zala

  5. M A T R I O S C A - AAP Project Title MAnagement Tools and Relations for Interregional Organisation to Strenghtening Co-operation in AAP ERDF funding 488.000,00 Project Cost Co-financing (EU partners) 366.000,00 TOTAL 854.000,00 Date of start 01.06.2005 Project Duration Date of finalisation 31.12.2007 Duration 30 months 14 Partners from five countries (LP Styria) 8 of them co-financing partners 2 associate partners Project Partners More information Project Updates No. 1 (May 2006) and 2 (Jan. 2007) Project Website: www.matriosca.net

  6. OPENING Franz Voves Steiermark

  7. PROJECT RESULTS •  Common strategies • Richard Hummelbrunner • Paolo Rosso

  8. Many crossborder co-operations…

  9. Many transnational opportunities …

  10. Large Scale Co-operation Current situation in AAP For global competitiveness need of pulling efforts

  11. What is missing • Clear definition of key challenges and shared objectives • Common strategy platform What do we need • Work for systemic competitiveness of AAP • Territorial partnership • Capitalize on past experiences • Reach critical mass in our operations • Common methodological approach Be effective  doing the right things Be Efficient  doing the things right

  12. Large Scale Co-operation

  13. MATRIOSCA AAP process Comparative analysis of regional strategies SWOT drafting A. Draft SWOT discussion and approval (TWG & MB) • B. Inputs for Macro-Themes definition: • indications and recommendations for incorporatingprevious projectslessons learned • strategic objectivesfor identifying priority macro-themes Macro-themes definition 

  14. MATRIOSCA AAP process To start with selected feasible contents reflecting the SWOT analysis, the political agreements and consistent with the respective development strategies and priorities Comparative analysis of regional strategies SWOT drafting 1. Draft SWOT discussion and approval (TWG & MB) 1. TERRITORIAL DVP AND POLYCENTRIC SYSTEMS 2. MATERIAL AND IMMATERIAL INFRASTRUCTURES WITH PROMINENT LARGE SCALE IMPACT 3. EXCELLENCE KNOWLEDGE NETWORKING 4. INNOVATIVE SMEs CLUSTERING • 2. Inputs for Macro-Themes definition: • indications and recommendations for incorporatingprevious projectslessons learned • strategic objectivesfor identifying priority macro-themes Macro-themes definition

  15. PROJECT RESULTS •  Joint Projects • SUSEN: Johann Binder • Innocluster: Enzo Moi • CNBC: Simona Rataj • UrbanNET: Blanka Bartol • NAT-REG: Daris Krajčić

  16. Multifunctional urbanized area - of regional significancee- of regional and supraregional significanceSpecialized urbanized area Alpine nature areaPannonian river basin nature areaCarst nature areaAdriatic coast and coastal wetland nature area Proposals prepared …

  17. PROJECT RESULTS •  Institution building • Tatjana Rener

  18. Capitalisation of experiences.. • Partners have long and rich experiences in a wider co-operation area, involving similar institutional structures from national to local level. (Entities based on a private law and private international law are already well experienced and functioning without problems) • - Responsibilities and competencesfor territorial cooperation are spread among all levels defined by partner’s political systems in place(Departments for External Relations, Sectoral Departments, Programme Authorities..).

  19. Viability of establishing “EGTC” • New challenge offered by the EU regulation, allowing public authorities to create cooperative groups with legal personality with the added bonus that it would genuinely be joint: • directly applicable, binding instrument • provides simplification of procedures, a tool to overcome • legislative and organisational problems • permits the stipulation of agreements involving Member States

  20. Shaping the “EGTC” in AAP territory • The institutionalisation of a trans-national public law body requires • the adoption of national provisions for effective application of Regulation No 1082/2006 on a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation • Convention/Statute finalised on the basis of political consensus (according to the agreed type of an “EGTC”)

  21. Defining new landscapes.. Source: The territorial state and perspectives of the EU, 7. 3. 2007

  22. Franz VOVES, Steiermark Marko STARMANN, Slovenija Franco IACOP, Friuli Venezia Giulia Verena DUNST, Burgenland János HARGITAI, Baranya Vladimir STOLNIK, Varaždin Political Statements Moderation: Claudia Gigler

  23. Josef MARTINZ, Kärnten Diego VECCHIATO, Veneto Rosza SIFTER, Zala Matyas FIRTL, Györ-Moson-Sopron László KUN, Vas Ivan DJOPAR, Koprivnica-Križevci Political Statements Moderation: Claudia Gigler

  24. CONCLUSIONS Franz Voves Steiermark

More Related