1 / 18

Status of automatic observation on aerodrome and ongoing improvements in France

Status of automatic observation on aerodrome and ongoing improvements in France. M. Leroy, Météo-France. Introduction. About 15 years ago, a new aerodrome was set up in the Estearn part of France (LFJL) Equiped for cat III operations. But, no observer from Météo-France.

jnewby
Download Presentation

Status of automatic observation on aerodrome and ongoing improvements in France

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of automatic observation on aerodrome and ongoing improvements in France M. Leroy, Météo-France

  2. Introduction • About 15 years ago, a new aerodrome was set up in the Estearn part of France (LFJL) • Equiped for cat III operations. • But, no observer from Météo-France. • Observation made by local fire fighters • Operational test of METAR AUTO started in 2001.

  3. Documentation of the possibilities and limitations of automatic observation • Spatial representativeness of visibility observation • Validity of cloud layers, calculated from ceilometer(s) measurements (ASOS algorithm). • No identification of CB and TCU • Limited list of Present Weather codes and reliability of PW detection and identification. • SPECI criteria : no SPECI AUTO with with 30 min. METAR AUTO

  4. Advantages • Continuous observation 24 hours a day • Reproducible measurements • Staff savings • Local reports updated every minute

  5. Minimum set of instruments • Basic measurements : pressure, temperature, humidity, wind • Ceilometer(s) • Present Weather Sensor • Forward scatter meter • (transmissometer/forward scatter meter for RVR)

  6. First feed-back • Good experience and users’ feed back for METAR AUTO in LFJL. • No degradation of the quality of TAF messages. • No major limiting meteorological conditions missed. • Meteorologists more reluctant than users ! • One reason may be the fact that observations are used for many purposes, not only aeronautic.

  7. Levels of service • Defined with the French civil aeronautic agency (DGAC) • METOBS1 : METAR with human observation 24h/day, except 3 hours during night (AUTO), with possible reactivation of human observation. • METOBS2 : METAR AUTO when staff is off duty • METOBS3 : METAR AUTO every 30 minutes. • METOBS4 : Occasional METAR, no SPECI : to be stopped.

  8. Actual status in France • List of 69 aerodrome with a defined level of service (METOBS1 .. METOBS3). • 52 aerodromes with METAR AUTO (target is 63 in 6 months). • Users are satisfied. • Improvements are on going.

  9. Improvement : Convective information • Use of the Météo-France lightning network and weather radar network. • Study over one year to check the correlation between human observation of CB/TCU (from METAR) and radar observation: • Above a given threshold of reflectivity. • For a minimum size of cell (adjacent pixels). • Within a given distance.

  10. An example : 30-Jul-2002 12h00

  11. Results of the study • Best correlation with human observation : 41 dBz (CB), 33 dbZ (TCU), 30 km max. distance. • But significant differences, mainly coming from the “definition” of CB • Human : visual detection of clouds or lightning stroke. No maximum distance defined. • Radar : High level of reflectivity. Max. distance defined. Very good correlation with behaviour of pilots avoiding high reflectivity area.

  12. CB/TCU, TS/VCTS detection

  13. CB/TCU coding

  14. TS/VCTS coding

  15. Operational system • Timing for the construction of diagnostics (CB/TCU, TS/VCTS) in Toulouse. • Getting the value in each aerodrome where METAR AUTO and local reports are constructed. • Adding the information in messages • 28 operational sites • 99% availability of information in messages.

  16. Improving the detection and identification of freezing precipitation. • Addition of a state of ground sensor : • Measurement of reflected light and back scatter light. • Difference between snow and rain/drizzle/ice. • Detection of humid and wet surface • Use of “ground” temperature and air temperature

  17. Conclusion • METAR AUTO well accepted in France. • Small aerodrome are interested in automatic observation, to improve their level of services. • ICAO is recognizing the automatic observation.

More Related