620 likes | 777 Views
Disclaimer. The following talk comes from my own personal experiences in academia, both good and bad. If you choose to follow some of the
E N D
1. Things I wish I knew then that I know now A talk for PhD students and young colleagues
Nick Powdthavee
2. Disclaimer The following talk comes from my own personal experiences in academia, both good and bad. If you choose to follow some of the advice given in this talk, it does not necessarily guarantee that it will work out in the exact same way that it did for me.
So please ? dont hold me accountable for any heartaches or disappointments which may arise out of your use of the advice given in this talk
3. Also, I just want to apologize to all of you beforehand if you feel at any point during the talk that this talk is mostly about me (as in me, Nick) and me only Because it is.
4. Hopefully, by the end of my talk, you will be able to take home the following points from my personal experiences How to survive your PhD almost unhurt
How to prepare yourself for an academic career (if you want one, that is)
How to publish well enough (and stay sane from doing so)
5. 1) How to Survive Your PhD almost unhurt
6. The following image summarizes the first four months of my PhD...
7. The Curse of Status Quo Bias I started my PhD in October 2001 not knowing where I was heading in life
So I chose to do a research on Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) simply because thats what I did for my Masters thesis project
And in case you dont know what CGE looks like, it looks something like this...
9. which, to me, can roughly be translated to
11. So the first four months was nothing short of a living hell
The CGE approach was as old as the hills and consequently it was extremely difficult to try and come up with any interesting research questions to address
And so I spent the first four months of my PhD reading hundreds of papers and in near depression
12. That is, until I met Andrew Oswald
13. Just a bit of background about AO (since hell be playing a large role in my talk in general) Professor of Economics (and Behavioral Sciences) at Warwick
Specializes in labour economics and health economics
One of the early researchers on the economics of happiness
Very well published and highly cited (over 29,000 citations on Google scholar)
Has two daughters, loves to play badminton and adores Japanese food
14. Taking a big leap After having met AO in one of the seminars, Ive decided to go against the traditions and asked him whether I could switch supervisors and to have him supervise me instead
At that time there was a big stigma attached to switching supervisors and research topics for PhD students
But luckily for me (and, in a way, for him), he accepted
15. The Silver-lining from Switching Even though I had to restart everything again after having spent four months doing something else, the benefits of switching to a new research topic were immeasurable
For a start, from when I had no questions to ask (about CGE), there were endless questions I wanted to know the answers to about what makes people happy
And so the first piece of advice I could give you at this point is
16. 1. Forget the sunk cost! We are normally primed to stick to the first choices we make even when they have turned out very badly for us. Dont be fooled by this urge to stick! Youll be forgiven to back out of things that do not suit you
17. What about happiness as a PhD research topic? Ten years ago, happiness research is frowned upon by mainstream economists
The fashionable thing to do (back in 2001) was to do a research on international monetary economics
To do a research on happiness for an economist, if youre not already established in other fields, was pretty laughable
18. But I believed in AO His advice to me was
If everyone likes your work, you can be certain that you havent done anything important
Although the reverse (If everybody hates your work, you can be certain that you have done something important) is probably not true!
19. The pressure on PhD students and young researchers are predominantly to conform, to fit in, to accept fashionable ways of analyzing problems, and above all to please senior professors and their own postgraduate peers
Unfortunately this is very bad for scientific progress
20. So my 2nd piece of advice is 2. What may seem fashionable today may not continue to be so when you finish your PhD
The best idea is to work on important, timeless, deep questions that most people have not thought of or think are too hard
If people say to you but nobody works on Z, then you have a chance to be able to do something of lasting value
21. But I think my 3rd piece of advice almost always overrules the 2nd 3. To be able to finish your PhD almost unhurt, make sure that you work on something you believe in, something that you are passionate about, it will help make the pain less painful
22. 2) How to Prepare for Your Academic Career (If You Want One)
23. My Happiness Years After finishing the first paper (or rather, the first chapter of my thesis), AO told me to submit it straightaway to an econ journal
That lucky journal was the Review of Economics & Statistics
Back then, there were no online submissions
Only hardcopies
24. It took 3 months for the rejection letter to arrive Back then, I had no idea how difficult it is to get yourself published anywhere
25. The Key to Success is sheer resilience
AO once told me in not so many words that my best quality was not my intellect nor my analytical ability (thanks, Andrew)
But its the fact that I have pretty thick skin, so much so that I can withstand rejections quite well
26. An illustration My paper I Cant Smile Without You: Spousal Correlation in Life Satisfaction went through the following journey
Review of Economic Studies (rejected) -> American Economic Review (rejected) -> Journal of Political Economy (rejected) -> Quarterly Journal of Economics (rejected) -> Journal of Human Resources (rejected) -> Journal of Marriage & Family (R&R: 1st time) -> Journal of Marriage & Family (R&R: 2nd time) -> Journal of Marriage & Family (rejected 3rd time) -> Journal of Family Psychology (rejected) -> Psychological Science (rejected) -> Journal of Royal Statistical Society: Series A (R&R: 1st time) -> Journal of Royal Statistical Society: Series A (R&R: 2nd time) -> Journal of Royal Statistical Society: Series A (rejected 3rd time) ->Journal of Human Resources (rejectedagain) -> Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization (rejected) -> Journal of Economic Psychology (R&R before getting accepted)
27. Since then I have been rejected 60+ times from journals in the past 6 years Thats about 10 rejections a year
28. One of AOs advice was The main difference between world-class researchers and sound researchers is not intellect; it is energy, single-mindedness, more energy, and the ability to withstand what will sometimes feel like never-ending disappointment, tiredness, and psychological pain.
Tenacity is almost everything.
29. Have journal referees be your 2nd supervisors AO was my only supervisor at Warwick
But I have many other anonymous journal referees to thank for in my thesis acknowledgement
Most of my PhD friends back then refused to submit their work anywhere
Its good to be perfectionist but only in moderation
30. Our roles as a social scientist In my 2nd year as a PhD student, AO told me that one of the important roles of a social scientist that people tend to ignore is that of translating what we find in our research to the general public
And so, in my 2nd year as a PhD student, I had my first radio interview experience with perhaps one of the most well-known radio stations in the globe
Yes, you guessed it, its Radio Coventry
31. Dealing with the Media Obviously this is hardly a requirement, especially from a PhD student
But if you want to become an academic, one that is well-known in the future, its considered a plus
Universities tend to have press officers who deal with this sort of things
Its also good practice build up your confidence for future presentations of your work, i.e. if you cant explain your complicated models to a laymans person, then your life in academic will not be as successful as it has the potentials to be
But it may also have a downside. For example, consider my first newspaper appearance
33. But that wasnt as bad as this
35. Sometimes journalists can take things out of contextBut when it goes well, it goes really well
37. And without the accumulated stock of media experience and early exposure to it, there wouldnt have been this
38. So for the 4th piece of advice 4. We tend to put off trainings which we believe are not directly relevant to us now dealing with the media is one example but the payoff of having participated in this kind of trainings can have a huge payoff for us both now and in the future
39. The crucial final year (3rd/4th year PhD)
40. The dreaded job market At the end of my PhD in 2005, I was lucky to have one paper forthcoming in Economica
Unbeknownst to me then, this had a huge impact on my prospects of getting job interviews
Out of 7 PhD students at Warwick, I was the only person in the first 4 months of us all finishing to have had job interviews
Not because I was way ahead of my peers (quite the opposite, I think) but it was because of that one publication which was something that distinguished me from the other 100 applications put forward for each position I applied to
41. But even then
Almost 100 applications sent
7 interviews
1 acceptance
42. We like things sugarcoated but knowing the reality will help us form better expectations about the future as well as what would be expected from us today
43. 3) How to publish well enough (and stay sane from doing so)
44. Some facts about publishing For economics, the average time that it takes from submitting a paper to a journal to seeing it in print is 2 years
And thats when the paper is accepted straightaway or gone through just one R&R
Normally, each paper is rejected at least once before getting accepted
This means that it may take 4 years since your first submission to seeing it in print (most romantic relationships dont even last that long!)
45. What does this mean then? Well, for a start, write, write, write
For PhD students (and young colleagues), the opportunity cost of not currently writing and not having things under-reviewed is incommensurable
Like catching fish, its always much better to have more than one net at a time
46. When youre done with a paper, send it out to close friends or colleagues (or even people you dont know but prominent in your field), you might be surprised when some respond!
Get a professional reader to check your prose invest a little. It will really help!
Thenoff to a journal! My philosophy is to treat each finished paper like a hot plate, which is something I cant hold on for too long
Once its off to a journal, forget about it. Its time to start on a new topic! What does this mean then?
47. Some tips on how to write less badly* Set a goal based on output, not input
I will work for 3 hours is a delusion; I will write three lines of my thesis today is a goal
Find a voice; not just get published
Most of us focus too much on getting published as if it had nothing to do with writing about ideas and arguments. How would my work affect somebody reading it 10 years from now? should be used as a benchmark for the way we write. Paradoxically, if all you are doing is trying to get published, you may not publish very much.
Remember, its easier to write when you are interested in what you are writing about.
48. Accept early that not all your work is profound
Many people get frustrated because they cant get an analytical purchase on the big questions that interest them. Then they dont write at all.
So start small. It is hard to refine your questions, define your term precisely, or know just how your argument will work until you have actually written them down Some tips on how to write less badly
49. Some tips on how to write less badly Organize your paper (as well as workshop presentations) in a newspaper and not in a joke style
Notice how newspapers start with the most important part, then fill in background later for the readers who kept going and want more details
A good joke, on the other hand, has a long windup to the final punchline
Dont write papers (or present papers) like that always put the punchline right up front and slowly explain the joke. Remember, readers dont stick around to find the punchline on Table 12.
50. Some tips on selecting where to publish There is a lot of pressure now to publish in the top-5 (AER, JPE, QJE, RESTUD, ECONOMETRICA)
My opinion is to have those as a guideline, but dont use them as the rule
Identify your field and know your top field journals (as they will be more realistic to aim for)
Have a mixed strategy, especially when youre just starting out in academic
For example, if you have three papers from your PhD thesis, identify the best one. Then send the weakest one to at least a middle-tier journal. The 2nd strongest to a top field. And the best to the top-5. Dont put all your eggs in one basket!
52. Some tips on finding the right motivations Finding the right motivation to publish is probably the hardest task for many but easy to some
Many PhD students I met in the past (especially from Thailand) did their PhD because:
I didnt want to start working yet
I had no idea what I was getting myself into
I thought having a Dr in front of my name would be cool
My parents wanted me to do it
It has become a norm now to have a PhD
Having an academic career seems very relaxing, so I wanted one
I dont know. Dont ask me. Leave me alone!
53. Finding intrinsic and sustainable motivations Im not saying that those motivations arent okay
All Im saying is that they are not sustainable and lack intrinsic values
As a result, people with those kinds of motivations tend to suffer quite a bit in their PhDs and in their academic career
54. My motivations (which you can feel free to adopt) My main motivation, ever since I started doing my PhD, was to see my family name (as well as my name) in print
This includes journal articles as well as newspapers
I even wanted to see my family name on a book cover and on a book shelf
I get a lot of joy from seeing that I am able to promote my family name far and wide across the globe
Pretty silly, I know, but in order for my name to be in print, what I do in my research has to be interesting enough in the first place
This makes my motivation both intrinsic and sustainable
55. Last but not least, some tips on how to cope with rejections
56. Rejection always hurts Unfortunately thats the truth, no matter how long you are in the business
The cold comfort is that almost everybody you know goes through similar experiences (like I said earlier, I get on average 10 rejections a year)
Dont take things personally. When you get a rejection letter, put it aside for a few days before start reading it. If there are messages that you can take stock to improve your paper, use them
Send it off again to another journal. Dont give up until you have at least 14 rejections (or that you feel it would only end up in only indecent journals that could prove negative on your CV)
57. Some examples about famous rejections John Grishams first novel was rejected 25 times
Jack Canfield and Mark Victor Hansen (Chicken Soup for the Soul) received 134 rejections
Richard Easterlins paper on happiness and economic growth was rejected by so many journals it eventually published as a book chapter (to date, it has been cited more than 2,000 times)
JK Rowlings Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone was rejected by a dozen of publishers. Bloomsbury, a small London publisher, only took it on at the behest of the CEOs eight-year old daughter, who begged her father to print the book.
58. More Sources What I have been talking about today is only a fraction of what you and I need to know in order to survive in this profession, so for more sources of advice:
How to publish in top journals by Kwan Choi (extremely useful!) http://www.bus.lsu.edu/hill/writing/choi.pdf
PhD thesis research: Where do I start? by Donald Davis (primarily for PhD students) http://www.columbia.edu/~drd28/Thesis%20Research.pdf
Writing tips for PhD students by John Cochrane http://www.bus.lsu.edu/hill/writing/cochrane.pdf
How to build an economic model in your spare time by Hal Varian (very useful if you are planning on becoming a theorist) http://www.bus.lsu.edu/hill/writing/varian.pdf
59. Journal Rankings Its also useful to know the international rankings of journals in economics
The ones I normally use come from this list:
Ranking of Econ Journals and Institutions (http://www.bm.ust.hk/econ/JEEA.Ranking.pdf)
Keel ranking of econ journals (http://www.keele.ac.uk/cer/K442.htm)
Econ Society of Australia (http://www.ecosoc.org.au/files/File/CC/Publications/ESA%20Rankings%20of%20EconomicsJournals%2020081.pdf)
ABS journal rankings (http://www.associationofbusinessschools.org/sites/default/files/Combined%20Journal%20Guide.pdf)
Ranking of Econ and Social Sci Journals (http://www.vcharite.univ-mrs.fr/pp/combes/CL_Ranking_with_econ_correction.pdf)
60. Let me end here with Andrews words
61. You have extraordinary intellectual talent. Try never to forget that, even when tempted. Work on what you believe in; it will help sustain you.
62. Thank you!