1 / 46

Particle Physics 2004 Birmingham 5 th -7 th April

Physics at the B-factories. Particle Physics 2004 Birmingham 5 th -7 th April. Adrian Bevan. Talk Outline. Current generation of B-factories CP Violation Studies: , ,  Rare Decays New Particle Searches  Physics Conclusions. The B-factories.

jocelyn-amadeus
Download Presentation

Particle Physics 2004 Birmingham 5 th -7 th April

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Physics at the B-factories Particle Physics 2004 Birmingham 5th-7th April Adrian Bevan

  2. Talk Outline • Current generation of B-factories • CP Violation Studies: , ,  • Rare Decays • New Particle Searches •  Physics • Conclusions

  3. The B-factories • PEP-II and KEK-B at SLAC and KEK, respectively • Collide e+ and e- with a 10.58 GeV CM energy • Detectors: BaBar and Belle • Started data taking in 1999 • 9GeV e- on 3.1GeV e+ • (4S) boost: bg=0.56

  4. (4S) off-peak • (4S) decays into B+B- or B0B0 • Cross Sections at (4S): “continuum background”

  5. IFR EMC e- SOLENOID e+ SVT DCH DIRC The Detectors BaBar Differences between BaBar and Belle are small Belle

  6. run 4 run 3 run 2 run 1 Data Samples Peak Lumi: 12×1033 cm-2 sec-1 Number of B pairs approx: 220×106 Peak Lumi: 8.16×1033 cm-2 sec-1 Number of B pairs approx: 200×106

  7. CP Violation Studies: Why is CP Violation so important? • Matter/anti-matter asymmetry in the universe • requires CP Violation •  known level of CPV is 109 times too • small for cosmology • Standard Model describes all CPV with a single • complex phase •  need to test • Flavour physics BSM has many parameters • can search indirectly for new physics and try to • (further) constrain models before the LHC

  8. CP Violation in meson decay The couplings, Vij, form a 3×3 matrix: The CKM Matrix; Wolfenstein Parameterisation: Understanding Standard Model CP Violation means accurate measurements of  and 

  9. mixing (,) (0,0) (1,0) The Unitarity Triangle SM Predicts a closed triangle with two independent phase angles:  & 

  10. Three observable interference effects: CP violation in mixing: (direct) CP violation in decay CP violation in interference of mixing and decay (Iml≠ 0) CP violation at the U(4S) time dependent effect time integrated effect – number counting time dependent effect – relevant for measuring CKM angles!

  11. Indirect CP violation S ≠ 0 Direct CP violation C ≠ 0 Analyse time evolution of B0B0system (assume DG=0):

  12. (,) (0,0) (1,0) Measurements Related to the angles of the Unitarity Triangle

  13. The CKM Angle : (Belle & BaBar) • Precision measurement of  from bccs • Perfect agreement with the SM Prediction •  Alternate measurements of  probe NP at TeV scale

  14. The CKM Angle : B0K0 • Rare Decay • loop or “pure penguin” • sensitive to new physics • measured  in this mode should agree with • So in SM:

  15. SM=+0.74 106 candidates B0K0S 3.5 deviation for S in KS Belle Claim “evidence for new physics” (from 152×106 B pairs) PRL. 91 (2003) 261602

  16. Preliminary 120 M BB B0→f KS B0→f KL BaBar Result consistent with SM B0 →  K0 hep-ex/0403026, submitted to PRL

  17. The CKM Angle : new hep-ex new result new result

  18. The CKM Angle :

  19. CP Violation in B0 →h+h-; h=r,p +Loops (penguins) W u,c,t Tree Level: •  measure eff • need to bound |eff-| (shift from loops) • different |Penguin/Tree| for different decays

  20. p+p- results for S and C Presented at LP ‘03 124×106 B pairs 152×106 B pairs 372 signal events 266 signal events LR preliminary hep-ex/0401029 -A= -0.58 0.15 0.07 = C S= 1.00 0.21 0.07 Observation of CPV Evidence for DCPV

  21.  Isospin Analysis: need B+-, +0 and 00limiting factor is B0→p0p0 124×106 B pairs • Small signal BR • qq and 0 background Significance including systematic errors = 4.2s Can’t do Isospin analysis in  without a super B factory Stuck with model dep. interpretation in  PRL 91 (2003) 241801

  22. Penguins are small in B  No observation published prior to last year  now have measurements of all modes run 1+2

  23. Preliminary Result run 1+2+3 • ~113/fb • 314 signal events Isospin analysis gives:

  24. The CKM Angle : Full Reconstruction 5207 ± 87 signal lepton kaon 25160 signal 6400 signal 4746 ± 78 signal 82/fb hep-ex/0308048 & hep-ex/0310037 (BaBar) hep-ex/0308048 (Belle) 2 of many methods under study: Full & Partial reconstruction of BD(*): sin(2+) Partial Reconstruction using 78/fb Only consider D* with l or K in other B O(50%) purity use hard pion from B decay and soft pion from D* decay. No low efficiency from D0 reconstruction  High Purity  Lower Statistics Preliminary

  25. Preliminary Combining results of both BaBar methods sin(2+) > 0.87 (68% CL) sin(2+) > 0.58 (95% CL)

  26. Only hint from Belle’s +-  Need More Data Direct CP Violation • Interference of diagrams with different strong • and weak phases • ’ in kaon system only observed manifestation

  27. (,) (0,0) (1,0) Measurements Related to Sides of the Unitarity Triangle semi-leptonic B decays

  28. Measurement of Vcb from semileptonic B decays Use model from Gambino and Uraltsev 8 parameter fit includes: |Vcb|, BR(XCe), mb and mc B(B→Xclν), |Vcb| and mb determined with precision of 2% or better! hep-ex/0403031, hep-ex/0403030 Preliminary Thanks to Henning Flaecher

  29. preliminary WMAP e.g. MSSM constraint hep-ph/0303043 (Ellis et al) excluded by th. 88×106 B pairs B →K* • Acp≤1% in SM. • SUSY can enhance to ~20% Reconstruct ~1150 signal in: Preliminary

  30. Non CP/UT physics from BaBar •  Too much physics activity to do justice to all areas: • We have work published/under study in many • areas including: • New Particle Searches • Rare B decays • Direct CP Violation Searches •  physics • lots more areas under study that I don’t have time to discuss.

  31. Last Spring from BaBar: • discovery of cs state: DsJ(2317) • evidence for Ds(2458) New Particle Searches data favour JP=0+ • revitalised charm meson spectroscopy • Belle and CLEO confirmed this discovery • led to improvement in theoretical models • State was found below DK threshold (previously assumed to be above threshold) • Now have many BDsJX branching fractions See: 2317: Phys.Rev.Lett. 90 (2003) 242001  105 citations! 2458: Phys.Rev. D69 (2004) 031101 • Ongoing work searching for Pentaquarks

  32. Belle Observe BXSll, XS=K, KS from Iwasaki’s talk at http://moriond.in2p3.fr/EW/2004/ • Rare Decay (FCNC) • Sensitive to NP • 72 Signal Events • 6.2 significance • 140/fb, 152×106 B pairs Also study where BF~7×10-7 (results available from both expts)

  33.  Physics: Overview Preliminary LFV decay searches: 91.5/fb Rare  decays  lifetime: 30/fb  = 290.8 ± 1.5stat ± 1.6syst fs signal box

  34. Conclusions • BaBar has first measurement of  from B • Belle Observes CPV in B • & sees hint of Direct CPV • Starting to test closure of the Unitarity triangle • Everything measured so far consistent with SM • Searching for New Physics at higher order: looking • closely at bs penguins: new measurements of  • Will have ~200-250/fb per experiment for ICHEP ’04 • (approx ×2-3 increase in stats over results shown)

  35. Knowledge of , from direct measurements CPV from B system is consistent with SM Constraints from:

  36. Additional Material:

  37. B0 → f0 K0 (CP even decay)

  38. cos(2) comes from interference between helicity states 104 tagged events (KS0)

  39. Preliminary • Rare Decay (FCNC) • Sensitive to NP Ali: PRD 66 034002 (2002) Ali: hep-ph/0210183 SM BF~7(1)×10-6 (ee) ~4(1)×10-6 () peaking BG component from charmonium and hadronic B decays c.f. 0.02(0.20) in SM

  40. Isospin Analysis Grossman Quinn bound Also see Charles, GLSS, Buchalla et al… 

  41. direct CPV related to a • doing analysis in region near  • Dalitz Plot analysis goal • K is self tagging • CK, SK, SK =0, CK =-1 • large expected: • ACP() & ACP(K) 804.2 ±49.2 signal events BF From Winter ’03 (82/fb)

  42. ~123106 B pairs LP ‘03 result (113 /fb) 2.4 Difficult to relate to  without DP analysis

  43. 0 0

  44. The whole picture for B-meson decay: • CP Violation in mixing: • so this is small • Direct CP Violation: • So far only seen in kaon decays • this can be a large effect in rare B decay • - Belle claim ‘evidence for’ in  decay • Indirect CP Violation – CPV in interference • Need to measure the unitarity triangle angles • , , 

More Related