350 likes | 367 Views
Addressing the parking challenges in the city's downtown area through a comprehensive plan focusing on customer experience, system sustainability, and resource optimization. Recommendations based on operational assessments and future needs to ensure a vibrant urban core.
E N D
Downtown Parking and Travel Management Plan April 14, 2015 Public Forum
Agenda • History – how did we get here? • Goals • Lessons from November 1 changes • Parking Management District • Next steps – timeline • Feedback from you
History – how did we get here? • 2013 – 2014 – over 60 meetings with downtown stakeholders (CEDO and BBA) identified parking as one of the key economic development challenges in our downtown • Summer of 2013 – DPW, BBA, and CEDO start meeting weekly to address parking • November 13, 2013 – BBA hosts Parking Summit in the Hilton – over 150 attendees with keynote speaker Jeffrey Tumlin of Nelson Nygaard • November 13, 2013 – USDN provides funding for CEDO to bring 7 cities’ parking experts to Burlington for a Parking Convening • November 2013 – City Council passes resolution empowering BBA, DPW and CEDO to launch the Downtown Parking Improvement Initiative
History – how did we get here? • Spring 2014 – Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission and business community fund BBA, CEDO, and DPW to hire experts to complete Downtown Parking and Travel Management Plan • Partners create Parking Advisory Committee with local stakeholders • June 2014 – BBA and City team hire DESMAN Associates, with support from Stantec, WZHA, UVM and Donald Shoup to complete the Plan • November 1, 2014 – City installs smart meters and multi-space parking meters, rolls out pilot pricing and later hourly enforcement, and makes improvements to the garages • November 19, 2014 – City and BBA host Parking Forum in collaboration with Residential Parking partners in Contois Auditorium, and launch www.parkburlington.com to gather feedback and educate • Winter 2014 – City collects and analyzes data from the pilot, continues work on the study, and continues to gather feedback
We have a parking problem Not enough spaces… Parking in the wrong places… Bad way finding… Can’t get to an open space… Accessibility challenges… Poor access control…
Goals • Deliver a consistently positive customer experience • Achieve a sustainable parking system • Maximize parking and transportation system resources for a vibrant downtown
Project approach • Assess current operations • Factor in future needs and growth • Help make the most of existing assets • Recommend immediate actions • Develop a long-range plan for management • Coordinate planning with Residential Parking and Transportation Demand Management studies • Present a plan which is politically, environmentally and fiscally sustainable
Study Area • Bounded by Pearl, Union, Maple and Lake Streets • Includes four zones • 40 total blocks • Includes office buildings, retail stores, restaurants, hotels, courthouses, City Hall and residences
Inventory • Definitions • On-Street = curbside parking • Public = clearly publically accessible • Private = indicated as exclusive • 8,081 spaces in total • 1,199 On-Street spaces • 2,825 spaces in 13 Public facilities • 4,057 spaces in 123 Private facilities • 39% (3,160 spaces) in Zone 1 • 26% (2,094 spaces) in Zone 2 • 23% (1,828 spaces) in Zone 3 • 12% (999 spaces) in Zone 4
On street assets • 1,199 spaces • Almost 2/3rds are mid-term meters • Fairly even distribution across zones
Public (off-street) assets • 2,825 spaces • Almost 2/3rds are located in Zone 1 facilities • City provides ~ 63% of total public capacity
Weekday observation (Thursday, 9/25/14) • Averaged 60% utilization • Highest utilization was at 1:00 PM (71%) • Average utilization rates: • Zone 1: 57% Zone 2: 73% Zone 3: 52% Zone 4: 57%
Weekdays: private off-street • Averaged 58% utilization for the day • Highest utilization was at 12:00 PM (69%) • Garages were better utilized (67% avg.) than lots (57% avg.) • Lots dedicated to employees had strongest utilization • Customer & resident lots were ~ 50% utilized
Observation conclusions • Office uses drive parking demand on weekdays, retail on weekends • Areas with complimentary land uses (hotel or residential & office) experienced a more balanced demand profile • Zone 2 is consistently subject to greatest localized demand • Pricing impacts asset utilization • Curbside parking and public lots are in highest demand • Public assets are unevenly utilized • Large amounts of private parking are going underutilized • Majority of motorists are practicing ‘line of sight’ wayfinding • Current enforcement efforts appear effective
Promoting complimentary mixed-use development Expand Improving wayfinding Creating a central parking & transportation resource Establishing differential pricing Establishing Shared Parking protocols Developing more effective management procedures/structures Promoting transportation options Possible solutions CHALLENGES REMEDIES Balancing existing supply & demand Reducing demand for on-street spaces Improving use of underutilized assets Unlocking underused private reserves Reducing parking demand at peak periods Restoring the supporting fund Improving service delivery
Objectives of Meter Pilot • Manage occupancy towards an 85% target • Improve compliance (i.e. voluntary payment of fees) • Introduce flexibility into the program • Create turnover for curbside spaces • Generate revenues for system improvements
4/14/2015 Park Burlington – Public Forum April 2015 Occupancy
4/14/2015 Park Burlington – Public Forum Comparison to Sept 2014
4/14/2015 Park Burlington – Public Forum Impact on Abutting Areas
4/14/2015 Park Burlington – Public Forum Length of Stay Analysis • Reviewed meter reports for 12/15/14 – 1/15/15 • ~285 meters with 10-20 transactions per day • 70% of transactions were credit/debit card • Purchases ranged from 30 minutes up to 6 hours • Average minimum purchase was ~ 0.5 hours • Average median purchase was ~ 1.5 hours • Average maximum purchased was ~ 3.0 hours
4/14/2015 Park Burlington – Public Forum Increase in Meter Revenues • Data based on total system revenues • Actual meter revenues, 11/13-3/14 = $419,302 • Projection with 50% rate increase = $628,953 • Projected improvement = $209,651 • Actual meter revenues, 11/15-3/15 = $712,186 • Actual improvement TYD = $292,884 • 40% increase over YTD revenues
4/14/2015 Park Burlington – Public Forum Parking Meter Revenues
Upcoming efforts • Determining prioritization of capital reinvestments • Strategy for Parking Management District • Coordination with other initiatives • Finish the planning effort
Capital reinvestments Capital reinvestments Development influencing the plan • New elevators in Marketplace Garage this year • Resurfacing, deck repairs, and drainage upgrades in College Street garagethis year • New signs and wayfinding • New lighting in College Street garage • Mall redevelopment – Town Center • More development projects downtown • Transit center – St. Paul • Walk/bikemasterplan
What is a parking management district? A comprehensive system of managing both public and private parking assets collaboratively. What are some examples? • Downtown improvement districts • Parking authorities • Private management entities Examples: Boise, ID; Ann Arbor, MI; Boulder, CO
PMD principles • Collaborative governance • Unified parking system • Measured implementation
Parking management district (PMD) • Provide high quality parking services at a fair market price • Promote the use of all transportation modes • Support the parking and transportation needs of existing and new development in downtown Burlington • Maximize the operational efficiency of our parking and transportation assets and systems • Create collaborative agreements with public and private downtown parking and transportation owners and operators – brings private parking spaces into the public system • Collect data on system usage and use that data to inform parking and transportation policy • Maintain fiscal stability and self sufficiency • Support branding, marketing and programs that increase downtown vitality • Integrate our parking and transportation efforts into a larger initiative which supports the vitality of our Downtown, preserves our natural resources, and supports the quality of life in downtown neighborhoods.
PMD Think About… • Operations versus ownership – public and private assets, on-street and off-street • Public voice – private stakeholders, users, employers, employees • Cover of all modes of transportation • How is it funded? • Who governs? • Other areas of responsibility – branding, signage, online interfaces, marketing, “parking broker,” etc.
Next steps • Get more feedback • Make recommendations – use data! • Capital reinvestment and new investment • Parking management district • Policy changes – pricing, operations, etc. • Zoning – data and best practices analysis • Coordination with TDM and Residential Parking • Come back with final plan from consultants in June
Next steps: public timeline • Continue meeting with PAC – April and May mtgs • May • Meet with stakeholder groups – seniors, arts, faith, employees, NPA’s, walk/bike advocates, business groups, city committees and commissions, transportation partners • May 18 – City Council meeting • May 20 – CSM Commission; DPW Commission • Late May – Final changes to the plan • June • DPW Commission endorsement • TEUC endorsement • City Council action
Get your feedback For more information, visit: www.parkburlington.com Email: dcolangelo@burlingtonvt.gov director@bbavt.org