E N D
2. Contents The US interest towards African oil & gas
The views from Houston and Washington
Managing governance-related risks
A critical view at CSR and US policies
Who really wants to fix these problems?
Are real solutions practicable, acceptable?
A note of hope, anyway
4. The US Interest(1) The view from Houston
5. The US Interest (1) The view from Houston (cont’d)
6. The US Interest(2) The view from Washington
7. Sustaining Oil Supply Diversity:Africa important, not decisive by itself
8. US interest towards African oil -- Summary Africa is key to the majors’ global growth strategies
Africa is important -- not in itself decisive -- to sustaining world oil supply diversity
The Houston-Washington consensus: Making Africa safe for energy investment
9. Oil & Gas Investment RisksFrom old to new issues From sanctity of contract, protection of economic rights, tax predictability…
Have receded -- though not disappeared
To governance-related issues
Political instability / conflicts / civil violence
Human rights abuses
Corruption / government wrongdoing
10. Governance-Related RisksThe general context
11. Africa is no exception
Latin America: Colombia, Bolivia… (Venezuela?)
Caspian / Central Asia: next governance headache for the industry?
Outside OECD, governance-related problems are the rule, not the exception
Old issues, new risks
Industry has known these problems for decades -- and lived with them
Pressure from NGOs has turned them into reputation risks -- and legal risks as well (FCPA, ATCA) Governance-Related RisksThe general context (cont’d)
12. US companies long remained skeptical of CSR-like initiatives
But it has changed: ChevronTexaco, ExxonMobil, Marathon, invest in community-development, health programs
But remain wary of unilateral publishing of payments to governments Governance-Related RisksHouston’s Response
13. Philanthropy v. TransparencyCSR as reputation risk management Dirty secret: IOCs can live with bad governance -- though they truly dislike it
Acting for transparency means likely trouble -- but unlikely benefits
Philanthropy yields reputation gains without hurting host government -- but leaves the structural problem intact
14. Rationale: Governance issues may hinder Africa’s oil & gas development
Bilateral carrot & (soft) stick approach
Preference for multilateral solutions (IMF, G8, OECD)
Proposals for a more aggressive US policy -- more attractive carrots, harder stick Governance-Related RisksWashington’s Response
15. Fixing Governance ProblemsPossible? Acceptable? Oil revenues are a destructive poison
No CSR solution; Transparency not enough
Proper management of revenues is a key factor, though no magical fix to the “oil curse”
The Chad-Cameroon example
Strict limitations to sovereignty over resources
Who else will accept such a regime?
“Talkin ’bout a revolution”
The most fundamental institution of the oil industry is at stake -- state-IOC E&P contract
16. Why Things Could Improveat last, a note of hope! Reputation/legal risks could escalate to the point that IOCs ask for radical solutions
A “race to the top” among African governments could progressively develop
CSR may contribute to raising the general level of interest for Africa’s oil-related troubles