310 likes | 318 Views
This article discusses the initiatives undertaken by the Belgian government to stimulate e-government, including a model for data exchange between back offices, proposals for an electronic identity card and an organization model on PKI infrastructure.
E N D
Some initiatives of the Belgian government in order to stimulateE-government Frank Robben General manager Crossroads Bank for Social Security Sint-Pieterssteenweg 375 1040 Brussel E-mail: Frank.Robben@ksz.fgov.be Crossroads Bank for Social Security
Plan of the exposure • model implemented for data exchange between back offices • proposal for an electronic identity card • proposal for an organization model on PKI-infrastructure
Definition of the problem • in all countries, many administrations are active in all the fields of public affairs : e.g. tax law, social security, transport, internal affairs • information is one of the main production factors for each of those institutions • the information needed by those many institutions is often similar • identification data • data concerning e.g. the professional, social, fiscal, familial status • periodical data related to working periods and wages • data concerning certain events, e.g. the occurence of a social risk
Definition of the problem • lack of coordination in the area of information management leads to • administrative overloading of the citizens, their employers, the municipality of residence,... • waste of efficiency and time within the institutions • suboptimal support of the policy • higher possibilities of fraud
Possible solutions • central data management (big brother concept) • not frequently implemented • privacy protection • technical feasibility • threat for the autonomy of the institutions • distributed data management (network concept) • decentralised but unique data gathering • decentralised and distributed data storage, with functional task-sharing between public institutions • data exchange via a network
A model for data exchange between back offices • structure of the network • unique identification key • register of references • basic organisation principles • data collection • data storage • data exchange • methods of electronic data exchange
sectorial organising unit KSZ-BCSS sectorial organising unit external database external database Central organising unit external network Crossroads Bank for Social Security
Unique identification key • natural persons and enterprises/establishments • unique • invariable • mentioned on an official document delivered to the holder • used by • every public institution • every person declaring information to public institutions
Register of references • 3 functions: • preventive access control • routing of information • automatic transmission of information • structure: • register of persons: what persons in what capacities have personal files in what public institutions for what periods • data availability register: what data are available in what public institutions for what types of files • access authorization register: what data may be transmitted to what institutions for what types of files
Organisation principles of the network • obligatory participation of all public institutions • every participant to the network can be supplier or addressee of data • coordination and management of the network by the central organising unit • normalisation • stimulation • project management
Organisation principles of the network • data collection • previous consultation of the network obligatory • data storage • decentralised • distributed • functional task-sharing between public institutions • valorization of external databases
Organisation principles of the network • data exchange • can be initiated • by the institution that needs the information • by the institution that disposes of new information • by the institution that manages the network • basically via the central organising unit • previous authorization by an independent Control Committee • systematical logging of all exchanges
Data protecting effects network concept implies • no central data storage • data exchange via the central organising unit => precautionary control on the legitimacy of data exchange • previous authorization of data exchange by an independent Control Committee
Advantages of data sharing (1/2) • improvement of the service offered to the citizen/ enterprise • faster processing of files • more accurate processing of files • reduction of the administrative charge • more guarantees on data protection • advantageous effects for public sector • control of the administrative costs • more efficient fraud detection • more efficient policy support • more flexibility in answering to changing needs
Advantages of data sharing (2/2) • more efficient working of the administrations • prevention of double work by task-sharing • optimalisation of task execution by computerisation • occasion for a self-critical attitude regarding internal organisation • basis for efficiency and quality assurance
Smart cards • possible functions • identification of the holder • natural person • enterprise - establishment • authentication of the holder • natural person • enterprise - establishment • generation of an electronic signature • proof of qualities, characteristics, access rights, … • transport of data • transport of programs
Electronic identity card • working proposal • storage of identity data • possibly storage of insurance status in the health care sector • possibility of storage of private key for generation of electronic signature • possibility of storage of private key(s) for proof of qualities • “rentable” place for storage of other data • no biometrics • no data concerning driving licence
Model on PKI-infrastructure • legal framework • European Directive 1999/93/EC • adaptation art. 1322 Civil Code • bill concerning functioning of the certification-service-providers • proposal for an organization model on PKI-infrastructure, approved by the Council of the ministers of 22 November 2000
European Directive • Member States shall ensure that “qualified” electronic signatures • have the same value as a handwritten signature • are admissible as evidence in legal proceedings • “qualified” means • based on a qualified certificate, t. means a certificate which meets the requirements laid down in Annex I of the Directive • that is provided by a certification-service-provider who fulfils the requirements laid down in Annex II of the Directive • and that is created by a secure device which meets the requirements laid down in Annex III of the Directive
European Directive • an electronic signature can not be denied legal consequences solely on the grounds that it is • not based upon a qualified certificate • not based upon a certificate issued by an accredited certification-service-provider • not created by a secure device • Member States may make the use of electronic signatures in the public sector subject to possible additional requirements which • are related to the specific characteristics of the application concerned • are objective, transparent, proportionate and non-disciminatory • don’t constitute an obstacle to cross-border services
European Directive • each Member State shall ensure to • the certification-service-providers which are established on its territory • and issue qualified certificates • to the public for the establishment • of an appropriate system of supervision • of a liability scheme • Member States shall not make the provision of certification services subject to a prior authorisation
European Directive • Member States may introduce voluntary accreditation schemes • aiming at enhanced levels of certification-service provision • based on objective, transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory conditions • without limiting the number of accredited certification-service-providers
Adaption art. 1322 Civil code • Addition paragraph 2 “For the purpose of this article can meet the requirement of a signature, a set of electronic data that can be attributed to a particular person and that proves that the content of the act has been maintained”.
Bill functioning certification-service-providers • Implementation European Directive into Belgian law • provision that qualified electronic signature meets the requirements of art. 1322, p. 2 Civil code • scheme of minimal missions (issuance, management, revocation of certificates) and liability of certification-service-providers • rules at suspension of activities by certification-service-provider • voluntary accreditation scheme • rules regarding liability of certificate holder • supervision and sanctions • possibility to make the use of electronic signatures in the public sector subject to additional requirements
Organization model: purposes • promote rapid availability of identity certificates • guarantee quality of identity certificates • promote multifunctional and free use of identity certificates • guarantee open market of independent evolving certification authorities • guarantee interoperability between certification authorities • guarantee conformity with evolving technical standards • conformity with the European Directive
Proposal organization model: notions • identity certificate: proof of identity • attribute certificate: proof of characteristic (for example: function, quality, mandate) • function of registration authority (RA): ‘counter’ where the certificate is requested and that verifies if communicated identity or characteristic is correct; if so, she approves the request and reports this to the certification authority • function of certification authority (CA): produces on the base of the information from the RA a certificate which is linked with a pair of keys and which indicates what the pair of keys further proves, and manages that certificate
Proposal organization model: scope • identity certificates attribute certificates • with regard to natural persons legal persons or organizations • used for the generation of electronic signature into the scope of ICT-application of the government which require an electronic signature in the scope of E-commerce, E-banking, … • no objection to (elements of) the organization model being used voluntarily beyond the specified scope
Proposal organization model: additionalrequirements • possibility to appeal to municipality as registration authority for identity certificates • possibility of separate use of identity and attribute certificates • private key associated to identity certificate is saved on a secure processorchip card with at least pincode protection • free use and verification of identity certificates • quality and operability standards
Proposal of organization model: working-out • government publishes additional requirements • CA prove that they meet the additional requirements • at call for electronic identity card, the holder can have on this card a private key that is associated to an identity certificate • for which the municipal has served as registration authority • that is issued by a CA meeting the additional requirements and chosen by the holder • electronic identity card contains necessary space to store other private keys associated to attribute certificates that holder can obtain at CA of his choice
Proposal of organization model: working-out • private key associated to identity certificate on electronic identity card can be used to generate electronic signature into the scope of ICT-applications of the government which require an electronic signature
RC Bull Bull ERA De Gemeenten Face to face identification Proposal of organization model: scheme VRK VRK CM/CP/CI (7) (4) (5) (9) (8) (10a2) (6) CA (10a1) (3) CA Meikäläinen Matti PIN & PUK1 - code (10b) (1) - (2), (12) (11) (13)