430 likes | 700 Views
2. Presentation Outline. Background
E N D
1. 1 Predicting Success in Math: The relationship between high school courses and remedial math in college
Brandon Lagerquist
Northshore School District
Paul Stern
Washington State University
Social & Economic Sciences Research Center
March 26, 2009
2. 2 Presentation Outline
Background – why study relationship between high school math and college remediation?
Math Placement and First College Enrollment in Math
Predicting the Need for Pre-College Math
Exploring Differences between Students at 2-Year and 4-Year Colleges
Pre-College Needs of Students who took Higher Levels of Math
Implications and future research xx
3. 3 Background Why is remedial math in college an important topic?
it is one indicator of preparedness.
need for remediation strains budgets.
need for remediation costs time and causes frustration.
need for remediation is a barrier to success.
4. 4 Pre-College Math is a Barrier to Degree/Certificate Completion x
x
5. 5 Study Sample (N=1,219)
Graduated from high school in 2004 or 2005
Enrolled in district at least 3 years and took the WASL
Not enrolled in the ELL program
Enrolled at a public college and information available about readiness for college-level math or English xx
6. 6 Data Sources High school transcript, assessment, and demographic information
Higher education enrollment and remediation data from the Graduate Follow up Study (GFS) and National Student Clearinghouse (NSC)
Enrollment & assessment data from Washington’s public colleges and universities
Placement test results, math enrollments, and math grades from Bellevue, Cascadia, and Shoreline Community Colleges. x
x
7. 7 Definition of “College Ready” in Math: 2-Year Colleges Bellevue, Cascadia, & Shoreline College: College-readiness was determined by examining the math placement test results, the level of first enrollment, and/or the grade earned in the first math class. (N=617)
Other 2-Year College: A student was college-ready if they enrolled in a college-level math course at a community college without first taking a remedial course. (N=104)
8. 8 Definition of “College Ready” in Math: 4-Year Colleges Washington Public 4-Year College: A student was college-ready if they received a score on the Math Placement Test that placed them into a college level course, and if they were not identified on the Graduate Follow up Study as having enrolled in a remedial course. (N=498)
xx
9. 9 College Readiness by Type of College
10. 10 Distribution of Highest Math Course Passed
11. 11 Math Placement and First College Enrollment in Math
To what extent did students who placed into pre-college math at a CTC defer enrollment in math until after their first year?
How many and which students placed into college-level math but choose to start at the pre-college level?
How many and which students placed into pre-college but enrolled at the college level?
12. 12 Placement & Enrollment of Local Community College Students
13. 13 Immediate or Deferred Enrollment?
14. 14 Placement and Level of Course Enrolled in
15. 15 Focus on Students with No Math Information
16. 16 Placement and Level of Course Enrolled in
17. 17 Predicting the Need for Pre-College Math
Does a student’s course-taking history predict whether they will need to take pre-college or “remedial” courses?
Does the timing of high school coursework influence the need for remedial instruction?
Does a student’s grades in math predict whether they will need to take remedial math?
How does performance on the math WASL relate to the likelihood that a student will be ready for college level coursework?
18. 18 College Readiness by Type of College
19. 19 College Readiness by Highest Course Passed
20. 20 College Readiness by Timing of Highest Course
21. 21 College Readiness by Grades in Math
22. 22 College Readiness by Math WASL Performance
23. 23 College Readiness by High School
24. 24 Findings from Regression on Math College Readiness Logistic regression with an R2 value of 48%
Highest level math course (most important)
Math WASL Score
High School Math GPA
Gender (Males more likely)
Taking a math course in the senior year
Non-significant variables: High school, ethnicity, level of college enrollment, and SPED
25. 25 Differences between 2-Year and 4-Year College Students
What are the differences in college readiness rates by student characteristics and math background between students at two-year colleges and at four-year colleges?
26. 26 Comparing 2-Year and 4-Year College Readiness
27. 27 Comparisons by Demographic Characteristics
28. 28 Comparisons by Math Background
29. 29 Pre-College Needs of “Higher Level Math” Students
Focusing on Calculus and Integrated 4 students, what can course grades, WASL math scores, placement test results, and course enrollments tell us about the pre-college needs of these students?
30. 30 Overall College Readiness Rates in Math
31. 31 College Enrollment Rates
32. 32 College Readiness is a Function of Overall Preparation
33. 33 Students are not choosing to enroll in a lower level class
34. 34 Conclusions: Placement and Enrollment (Part 1) Students who placed into pre-college math were more likely to wait a year or more (29%) before enrolling, than those who placed at the college level (18%).
Students who placed at the pre-college level and did not enroll in a math class were most likely to have stopped at or below Int. 2 and much more likely to have a D average or lower in math. x
x
35. 35 Conclusions: Placement and Enrollment (Part 2) Students who placed at the college level and did not enroll in a math class were more likely than their peers to have stopped at Int. 4/Pre-Calculus and have a C average in math.
Students who placed at the college level and enrolled at the pre-college level were more likely than their peers to have stopped at Integrated 3/Algebra II. x
x
36. 36 Conclusions: Predictors of Remediation The need for pre-college math can be explained by courses taken, WASL scores, and student grades.
Differences between high schools are most often a function of the above factors. x
x
37. 37 Conclusions: Two-Year and Four-Year Students At two-year colleges, males and Asian Americans were more likely to be ready for college-level coursework than other groups.
Students attending four-year colleges enter with higher math skill levels than students attending two-year colleges. x
x
38. 38 Conclusions: Calculus and Integrated 4/Pre-Calc Students Students with lower grades and lower WASL test scores were less likely to be college-ready than their peers with higher grades and higher test scores.
There is no evidence that students are placing into college level and making an independent choice to start at the pre-college level. x
x
39. 39 Conclusions Integrated 4 is the key course for college-level math.
281 students completed Integrated III as a junior and did not move on to Integrated IV as a senior.
how do we convince these students to take Integrated IV as a senior? (39% college ready who stopped at Int. 3 versus 80% college ready who stopped at Int. 4.)
But, would those students who stopped at Int. 3 be successful at Int. 4? What is the difference between a junior who takes Int. 3 and moves on to Int. 4 as a senior versus the student who takes Int. 3 as a junior and no math as a senior?
40. 40 Research implications for counselors -- What our HS students need to know: Passing the WASL is not enough -- math is a problem and barrier for many college students.
You need more than just Algebra II or Integrated 3 to have a high probability of moving directly into college level math.
Starting in college with pre-college math does not mean you can't go on to complete a degree. But it will slow you down in comparison to other students: it will cost you money and time.
Don't take a math class just to keep in practice - take a higher level math class to upgrade your skills and placement. x
x
41. 41 Research implications for faculty -- What our math instructors need to do: High school faculty: Go back to college.
Take the placement test(s) used by your local college.
Sit in on courses that students coming out of your courses should matriculate into.
College faculty: Go back to high school.
Sit in courses that students coming into your courses should be coming from.
Participate in a professional learning community with a focus on your shared problem. Share…
Curriculum alignment
Effective instructional techniques & assessments Share the problem –
Learn the problem
Identify & Implement solutions
Share the problem –
Learn the problem
Identify & Implement solutions
42. 42 Contact Information
Paul Stern
Washington State University
Social & Economic Sciences Research Center
Puget Sound Division
360-576-6030 ext. 21
http://www.sesrc.wsu.edu/k12
sternpo@wsu.edu
Brandon Lagerquist
Northshore School District
425-408-7722
blagerquist@nsd.org
43. 43 Acknowledgements Funding for the preceding research was made possible in part due to grants from:
Washington Educational Research Association (WERA)
www.wera-web.org
Transition Math Project (TMP)
www.transitionmathproject.org