160 likes | 167 Views
This document summarizes the findings, conclusions, and recommendations from the 3rd meeting of the parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness. It includes discussions on audit design, sharing of information, survey structure, joint reports, and lessons learned. The report also assesses the audits conducted by participating SAIs and provides a comparative analysis of their findings.
E N D
The 3 rd Meeting of Parallel/Coordinated Audit on Disaster Preparedness Towards Joint Report!.. Preparedness Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Kick-off Meeting1st Meeting in Antalya, 25 October 2011 • Scope of the parallel audit • Audit types/audit perspective • How to designstudy • Preliminary Schedule • Next steps Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
First Steps • Obtain background knowledge and information needed • to understand the entity to be audited, • to allow on assessment of the problem and risk • to plan the study • to specify staffing requirements • to determine the study timetable • Prepare the study proposal. • Plan the study • Determine audit objectives and methodology • Formulate the audit criteria. Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Discussion Topics in the 2st Meeting in Ankara, 25-26 April 2012 • How should this Parallel Audit be Conducted? • In what form and to what extent should the participating SAIs share information? • In what form should the audit results be documented? Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Survey Structure • Part A: Audit Design • Part B: Parallel Audit Results • Part C: The Draft Guidelines for Auditing Disaster Preparedness • Part D: Cooperation among SAIs • Part E: Next Steps of Parallel Audit • Part F: Closure Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Content for Joint Reports • Preamble • Introduction/ Background • Scope and objectives of parallel audit • Participating SAIs • event analysis and risk assessment (types of disaster; Disaster information system etc.) • Common audit methodology • Summary • Part I Joint conclusions and recommendations/ Different Examples • Part II Comparative analysis and assessment of auditing of participating SAIs. • Specification of policy gabs and legal arrangement related to disaster preparedness • Assessment of governance structure based upon organization& coordination structure • Evaluation of national strategies, national and local planning. • Usage and evaluation of management tools such as GIS, GPRS, GPS, early warning systems • Evaluation of training activities and public awareness campaigns • Analysis of financial structure concerning disaster preparedness • Assessment of projects & programs for making urban area resilient • Part III Summary of National audits on disaster preparedness. (Objectives and scope of the audit, common criteria, risks to VFM, key findings of the audit, good practice examples) • Part IV Lesson learned for SAIs Improving International and Regional Collaboration to Struggle against disaster • Importance of International and Regional Collaboration • The Need for the International and Regional Initiatives Development • Enhancing the Efficiency of the SAIs (Monitoring and supervision)
Introduction/ Background • Scope and objectives of the parallel audit • Participating SAIs • Identification of the characteristics of the disaster in the countries of participating SAIs. Q.5 : Please give information about the characteristics of the disaster such as event analysis and risk assessment in your country by taking into consideration the ISSAI 5510 part 3, p.13.4 and 13.5. It would be better to support information with statistics and graphics. • Common points of audit methodology Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Introduction/ Background Common Audit Methodology • Data and document analysis • Interview • Questionnaire • Analysis plans and budget, etc. • Observation / physical examination / site visit • Confirmation (oral and written) • Verification list Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Audit Questions& Criteria • Common Questions& Criteria Azerbaijan, Chile, India(+), Indonesia (+/-), Pakistan, Romania (flood), Romania(earthquake+/-), Turkey • Different Questions & Criteria Philippines, Ukraine • Lack of information Netherland (+/-?) Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Part I: Joint Findings/ Conclusions and Recommendations Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Part II: Comparative Analysis and Assessment of Participating SAIs’ Audits • Specification of policy gabs and legal arrangement related to disaster preparedness • Assessment of governance structure based upon organization& coordination structure • Evaluation of national strategies, national and local planning. • Usage and evaluation of management tools such as GIS, GPRS, GPS, early warning systems • Evaluation of training activities and public awareness campaigns • Assessment of financial structure concerning disaster preparedness • Assessment of projects & programs for making urban area resilient Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Concerning Legal Framework • When disaster law was published, • Whether the law is satisfactory in terms of effective management and coordination of disaster preparedness activities, • Which aspects of the legislation is deficient/missing, • Which kind of activities related to disaster preparedness are left outside the scope of this law • Specification of policy gabs etc. Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Part III: Summary of National Audits on Disaster Preparedness • Scope and objectives of the audit, • Criteria, • Risks to VFM, • Key findings/ conclusions • Good practice examples • Other issues which SAI wants to emphasise Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Part IV: Lesson learned for SAIs • Improving international and regional collaboration to struggle against disaster • Importance of international and regional collaboration • The need for thedevelopment of international and regional initiatives • Enhancing the efficiency of the SAIs (Monitoring and supervision) • Other issues which participating SAIs want to emphasise Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
The Schedule for the Parallel/Coordinated Audit Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013
Thank you Arife COŞKUN Turkish Court of Accounts (TCA) e-mail:acoskun@sayistay.gov.tr Tel: +90 312 295 37 01 Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rdMeeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February2013