1 / 28

Assistance in Times of War

Assistance in Times of War. Neutral, Impartial and Independent humanitarian action. Winning hearts and minds. Cross purposes. Purpose of war: “ Der Krieg ist eine bloße Fortsetzung der Politik mit anderen Mitteln” (politics by other means)-Carl von Clausewits

judithh
Download Presentation

Assistance in Times of War

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assistance in Times of War Neutral, Impartial and Independent humanitarian action

  2. Winning hearts and minds

  3. Cross purposes • Purpose of war: “Der Krieg ist eine bloße Fortsetzung der Politik mit anderen Mitteln” (politics by other means)-Carl von Clausewits • Purpose of humanitarian action: “to prevent and alleviate human suffering” – Red Cross fundamental principles • So, when the military provides aid, what is the purpose? • Does it matter?

  4. The force multipliers • Colin Powell: “And I want you to know that I have made it clear to my staff here and to all of our ambassadors around the world that I am serious about making sure we have the best relationship with the NGOs who are such a force multiplier for us, such an important part of our combat team.”

  5. Aid integral to fighting wars

  6. Neutral and independent aid • The Red Cross, born of a desire to bring assistance without discrimination to the wounded on the battlefield, endeavours – in its international and national capacity – to prevent and alleviate human suffering wherever it may be found. Itspurpose is to protect life and health and to ensure respect for the human being. It promotes mutual understanding, friendship, co-operation and lasting peace amongst all peoples.

  7. Red Cross/Red Crescent principles • Impartiality • giving priority to the most urgent cases of distress • Neutrality • may not take sides in hostilities • Independence • must maintain their autonomy

  8. Code of Conduct • 1.The Humanitarian imperative comes first. • 2.Aid is given regardless of the race, creed or nationality of the recipients and without adverse distinction of any kind. Aid priorities are calculated on the basis of need alone. • 3.Aid will not be used to further a particular political or religious standpoint. • 4.We shall endeavour not to act as instruments of government foreign policy.

  9. Code of Conduct • 5.We shall respect culture and custom. • 6.We shall attempt to build disaster response on local capacities. • 7.Ways shall be found to involve programme beneficiaries in the management of relief aid. • 8.Relief aid must strive to reduce future vulnerabilities to disaster as well as meeting basic needs. • 9.We hold ourselves accountable to both those we seek to assist and those from whom we accept resources. • 10.In our information, publicity and advertising activities, we shall recognise disaster victims as dignified human beings, not hopeless objects.

  10. International Humanitarian Law Humanitarian Law International Public Law Human Rights Law • Right to life and dignity • -Ban on torture and ill treatment • -Ban on slavery • Ban on retroactive legislation

  11. The Laws of Armed Conflict Laws on initiating war Laws on the waging of war (jus in bello or International Humanitarian Law) (jus ad bellum) Conflict

  12. International Humanitarian Law: Finding a balance

  13. The coordinated approach

  14. Politicising aid • “Humanitarian soldiers”:Military engages in humanitarian activity • Aid workers as government agents: Humanitarian agencies fulfill military or political goals • Humanitarian placebo – aid supported in lieu of political or military engagement Sarah Kenyon Lischer Global Governance 2007

  15. Trend since 1990s • Kevin Henry, dir. of advocacy for CARE: Increasing trend “use and co-opt humanitarian assistance as an integral part of warfighting.” • ICRC: “Narrowing humanitarian space.” • Overseas Development Institute: Military “devouring” humanitarian space

  16. Danger of “coordinated approach” • Aid not distributed according to need but according to political considerations • Marginalises needs-based humanitarian action • Reduces trust in the idea of humanitarian action as a fundamental principle of International Humanitarian Law

  17. Capability vs. Credibility • Military has enormous logistical capability – but are they ready to use it without reference to political ends? • Humanitarian agencies have credibility if they emphasise neutrality and independence – but often lack capability to tackle large scale emergencies • In large-scale, complex emergencies both are often needed; capability and credibility

  18. Assistance in Times of War Neutral, Impartial and Independent humanitarian action

More Related