300 likes | 457 Views
. . . Committee on Operating Rules for Information Exchange (CORE) May 2005L. Carl Volpe, PhDVice President, Strategic InitiativesWellPoint, Inc. . Today's Agenda . CAQHImproving Access to Eligibility and Benefits InformationCommittee on Operating Rules for Information Exchange (CORE)Go
E N D
1. Day 1, Track 5 L. Carl Volpe
2.
3. Today’s Agenda CAQH
Improving Access to Eligibility and Benefits Information
Committee on Operating Rules for Information Exchange (CORE)
Goal
Participation
Work Groups
Timeline
4. An Introduction to CAQH The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) is a not-for-profit
alliance of health plans and networks that promotes collaborative
initiatives to:
Make healthcare more affordable
Share knowledge to improve quality of care
Make administration easier for physicians and their patients
5. Areas of Focus
CAQH designs and implements achievable, concrete initiatives to make administration easier for physicians and consumers
Universal Credentialing DataSource
Simplified Prescribing
Standard Billing Terminology
Online Eligibility and Benefits Inquiry
7. Focus On Eligibility and Benefits HIPAA does not offer relief for the current eligibility problems
Data scope is limited; elements needed by providers are not mandated
Does not standardize data definitions, so translation is difficult
Offers no business requirements, e.g. timely response
Individual plan web sites are not the solution for providers
Providers do not want to toggle between numerous websites that each offer varying, limited information in inconsistent formats
Vendors cannot offer a provider-friendly solution since they depend upon health plan information that is not available
Data interpretations vary from plan to plan and can not be accurately translated by vendors
Data elements available from plans vary and are very limited, requiring providers to still call the health plans
Access is not available for all plans and/or plan products
Vendors maintain multiple interfaces, yet have minimal provider uptake
8. Online Eligibility and Benefits Inquiry: Vision Providers will send an on-line inquiry and know:
Which health plan covers the patient *
Whether the service to be rendered is a covered benefit (including copays, coinsurance levels and base deductible levels as defined in member contract)
What amount the patient owes for the service**
What amount the health plan will pay for authorized services**
9. Online Eligibility and Benefits Inquiry: Vision As with credit card transactions, the provider will be able to submit these inquiries and receive a real-time response*:
From a single point of entry
Using an electronic system of their choice
For any patient
For any participating health plan
*CAQH initiative will initially support batch and real-time.
10. Industry Operating Rules Are The Key What are operating rules?
Agreed upon business rules for utilizing and processing transactions
Encourages the marketplace to achieve a desired outcome – interoperable network governing specific electronic transactions
Key components
Rights and responsibilities of all parties
Transmission standards and formats
Response timing standards
Liabilities
Exception processing
Error resolution
Security
CAQH to serve as facilitator of cross-industry operating rules development
11. Industry Support
12. Committee on Operating Rules for Information Exchange
A multi-stakeholder initiative organized and facilitated by CAQH to create, disseminate and maintain Operating Rules and to enable healthcare providers to obtain patient-specific information about the patient’s healthcare benefits
13. CAQH Role: Facilitator This graphic illustrates the steps by which we envision the initiative playing out. We have just launched Step 1
Soon, we will be contacting those organizations represented on this Committee as well as others to participate in the process. The stakeholders, together, will establish the vision and charter and will be responsibility for the development of the operating rules and tools for their implementation.
This graphic illustrates the steps by which we envision the initiative playing out. We have just launched Step 1
Soon, we will be contacting those organizations represented on this Committee as well as others to participate in the process. The stakeholders, together, will establish the vision and charter and will be responsibility for the development of the operating rules and tools for their implementation.
14. Initiative Status Orientation Meeting held January 11, 2005
More than 125 representatives from 70 organizations
Payer community
Provider community
Technology vendors
Critical standard-setting organizations
Banking industry
Government agencies (CMS, ONCHIT)
CORE Participants
More than 60 organizations to date
Three Work Groups in process of crafting draft rules
15. Current Participants as of April 21, 2005 Health Plans
Aetna, Inc.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee
CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield
Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield
Excellus BlueCross BlueShield
Health Net, Inc.
Health Plan of Michigan
Humana, Inc.
Independence Blue Cross
Kaiser Permanente
WellPoint, Inc.
Associations / Regional Entities / Standard Setting Organizations
America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP)
ASC X12
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA)
eHealth Initiative
Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA)
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)
National Council for Prescription Drug Programs (NCPDP)
Utah Health Information Network (UHIN)
Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (URAC)
Work Group for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI)
Government Agencies
Louisiana Medicaid – Unisys
Michigan Department of Community Health
Michigan Public Health Institute
TRICARE
United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Other
ABN AMRO
Accenture
Data Processing Solutions
PNC Bank
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Providers
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP)
American College of Physicians (ACP)
American College of Radiology (ACR)
American Medical Association (AMA)
Greater New York Hospital Association
HCA Healthcare
Laboratory Corporation of America (LabCorp)
Medical Group Management Association (MGMA)
Montefiore Medical Center of New York
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation (UWMF)
University Physicians, Inc. (University of Maryland)
Vendors
ACS State Healthcare
Affiliated Network Services
Availity LLC
Benefitfocus.com, Inc.
CareMedic Systems, Inc.
Electronic Data Systems (EDS)
Health Transaction Network
Healthvision
HTP, Inc.
InterPayNet
MedCom USA
Passport Health
Post-N-Track
ProxyMed
Quovadx
Siemens / HDX
The TriZetto Group, Inc.
ViPS (a Division of WebMD)
WebMD
16. Functionality to be Addressed CORE will begin by drafting rules for the following:
Confirm which health plan covers this patient
Confirm health benefit plan coverage
Confirm Service Type (e.g., major medical, long-term care, laboratory, etc.)
Provide Co-Pay Amount*
Provide Base Deductible*
Provide Co-insurance Level*
*Not accumulator, but amount defined in contract
Data elements will be based upon HIPAA 270/271 standards. Additional functionalities will be addressed after rules are written for the scope above.
17. Topics for Consideration Standard and clear definitions and interpretations of the data elements
Roles and responsibilities of all parties
Technical transmission standards and formats
Standards for data timeliness of batch and real-time transactions; encourage market to move to real-time transactions over a specified timeline
Error resolution
Exception processing
Certification
Security
Standardized response reporting
18. CORE Structure - Phase I
19. Maintenance Phase – Later Phases
20. CORE Steering Committee
21. Participants Health plans
Providers
Technology companies
Clearinghouses
Government entities
Trade and professional associations
Vendors
Standard setting organizations
Consultants
Other interested organizations
22. Categories of CORE Membership Full Health Plan or Vendor Member
Full Provider Member
Private Advisory Member
Standard Setting / Technical Advisory Member
Government / Government Advisory
23. Work Groups Initial Work Groups
Policy Work Group
Rules Work Group
Technical Work Group
Potential Future Work Groups
Communications Work Group
Legal and Regulatory Issues Work Group
24. Policy Work Group (Chair: Bruce Goodman, Humana) Charge
Identifies policies/procedures CORE should develop and makes recommendations to the Steering Committee
Key areas
Standard agreement between participants and CORE
Certification and auditing
Enforcement
Third party service provider requirements
Granting variances to the rules
Exception processing
Participants
Management-level staff who are able to make policy decisions and are familiar with relevant industry issues as well as various stakeholder perspectives
25. Technical Work Group (Chair: Mitch Icenhower, Siemens) Charge
Determines technical specifications for CORE
Key areas
Connectivity
Security
Technical requirements of organizations either initiating and transmitting inquiries or receiving inquiries and generating responses
Test protocols
Participants
Individuals familiar with the technical implications of supporting the exchange of information between trading partners, the various technology solutions and options, and the individual system requirements of their organization
26. Rules Work Group (Chair: J. Steven Stone, PNC Bank) Charge
Writes the detailed business rules that will be reviewed by the Steering Committee and then voted on by CORE
Ensures CORE and its operating rules are coordinated with standard setting entities such as X12
Key areas
Detailed requirements of organizations initiating and transmitting inquiries and organizations receiving inquiries and generating responses
Definition of data terms
Methodology to address member search criteria
Acknowledgements
Response time
Participants
Individuals with experience in the business requirements for exchanging information between trading partners and a background in coordinating transaction specifications with daily operations
27. 2005 Timeline Highlights
28. Participation vs. Adoption Participation is voluntary
CORE participation only commits an organization to participate in the creation of the rules
Once the rules are approved by CORE, each member will decide on its own whether to adopt the rules
Adoption of the rules may require changes in contracts between relevant CORE parties
29. From Vision to Reality Provide easier access to consistent, predictable eligibility and benefits information at the point of care
Build upon HIPAA to promote the interoperability required
Recognize that no single organization, or any one segment of the industry, can do it alone
Come together to take the next step and fundamentally change the way that eligibility and benefits information is exchanged
30. www.CAQH.org