120 likes | 137 Views
New Framework for Strategic Goal Assessment. NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations November 8-9, 2006 Tom Cooley, Director, BFA. Assessment Framework FY07. Strategic Goals. Discovery Advancing frontiers of knowledge. Learning S&E workforce and scientific literacy.
E N D
New Framework for Strategic Goal Assessment NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations November 8-9, 2006 Tom Cooley, Director, BFA
Assessment Framework FY07 Strategic Goals Discovery Advancing frontiers of knowledge Learning S&E workforce and scientific literacy Research Infrastructure Advanced instrumentation and facilities Stewardship Supporting excellence in S&E research and education AC/GPA Annual Goals Cross-Cutting Objectives To Inspire and Transform To Grow and Develop Investment Priorities
Two Types of Strategic Goals Long Term Outcome Goals Discovery Learning Research Infrastructure (Aligned with NSB 2020 Vision) Annual Stewardship Goals Internally focused
Long Term Outcome Goals Under Each Goal: • Two Objectives: • To Inspire and Transform • To Grow and Develop • Several “Investment Priorities” that represent additional emphasis in the coming years
Evaluation of Long Term Goals • Conducted by the Advisory Committee for GPRA Performance Assessment (AC/GPA) • AC/GPA reviews program accomplishments (“highlights”), COV reports, other material, and submits annual report to Director • Stewardship is not a part of AC/GPA process
Stewardship “Support excellence in science and engineering research and education through a capable and responsive organization” (From the NSF Strategic Plan FY 2006-2011)
Stewardship Annual Goals…in the process of development EXAMPLES Program-related goals (time-to-decision, merit review process, broadening participation, facilities management) Administrative and management goals (award management & oversight, eGovernment, IT security, human capital management)
Sources of Annual Goals • Strategic Plan and its Investment Priorities • Management challenges/audit findings • Program practices (e.g. merit review process) • Proposer surveys: feedback on proposal and review process • PART (OMB’s Program Assessment Rating Tool) evaluations • PMA Scorecard
AC B&O Feedback from OE Assessment • Improve the consistency in the use of key terms in the assessment process, especially indicators, measures, goals, outputs, outcomes • Use quantifiable metrics, whenever possible, and provide appropriate baseline and contextual information to gauge the significance of the metric
Criteria for Establishing an Annual Goal • Is it important to the Foundation? • Is it clearly defined and understandable, both within and outside NSF? • Are resources available to carry it out? • Is it measurable? Are data readily available? • Is it useful to program managers? • Is it adaptable to changing requirements (e.g. PART, PMA, etc.) • What happens if NSF does not achieve the goal?
Stewardship and AC/B&O: For the May 2007 Meeting • Review connections between annual goals and the Strategic Plan • Review progress on achieving annual goals • Provide guidance and feedback on specific action plans to implement annual goals
Annual Stewardship Goals: Current Examples • Time to Decision: For 70 percent of proposals, inform applicants about funding decisions within 6 months of deadline or target date, or receipt date, whichever is later • Improve the Management of Large Facilities – cost & schedule variances for facilities under construction; operating time for operational facilities