170 likes | 284 Views
Realism’s Unacceptable Explanation. Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College. Overview. Background Unacceptable Explanations Realism’s Unacceptable Explanation. I. Background. NMA Some terminology Frost-Arnold’s Big Picture. I.A. NMA. P. Unacceptable.
E N D
Realism’s Unacceptable Explanation Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College
Overview • Background • Unacceptable Explanations • Realism’s Unacceptable Explanation
I. Background • NMA • Some terminology • Frost-Arnold’s Big Picture
I.A. NMA P Unacceptable P1. Science is empirically successful. P2. The approximate truth of scientific theories best explains this empirical success.[probably] C. Scientific theories are approximately true (= scientific realism.) Q best explains P --------------[probably] Q
I.C. Frost-Arnold’s Argument Key Ideas: • Some kinds of explanations are unacceptable to scientists. • Scientific realism (as propounded in the NMA) is one kind of unacceptable explanation.
II. Unacceptable Explanations • Examples • Objections & Replies
II.A. Example: Dormitive Virtues Why does opium put people to sleep? Because opium possesses a dormitive virtue.
II.A. Example: Entelechies Why do many organisms develop normally even if dismembered at an early stage of development? Because each species has an entelechy
II.A. Example: Platonic Solids Why are there six planets? Because there are five perfect Platonic solids, each encased in a globe nested within another globe corresponding to the next solid.
II.A. Example: Just-So Evolutionary Stories Why does an organism have trait T? Because its ancestors faced selection pressures P that favor T.
II.B. Objections & Replies • Misdiagnosis objection • Ad Hoc objection • Self-Evidencing Objection
III. Realism’s Unacceptable Explanation • Realism makes no new predictions • Realism fails to unify disparate claims
III.A. No Predictions • Conceptual Objection • Historical Objection, v.1 • Historical Objection, v.2
III.B. No Unification • Brute conjunction • Unifying truth • 2nd Order IBE
Recap • The NMA purports to offer a scientific explanation of science’s empirical success. • However, scientific explanations make novel predictions or unify disparate claims. • Frost-Arnold argues that scientific realism does neither. • So, if he’s right, the NMA fails by its own standards.