1 / 13

Stony Brook Update: A bit more on Negative Ions

Learn about charge transfer tests, flash lamp pulsing through MgF2 window, and the TOF spectrometer to measure electron-ion collision energies. Data corrected for noise, lamp drift, and ion tail. Explore attenuation length and rising QE Mean Free Path.

jzoe
Download Presentation

Stony Brook Update: A bit more on Negative Ions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stony Brook Update:A bit more on Negative Ions T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew

  2. HV Preamp Amp HV Scope GEM HV HV Preamp Amp GEM GEM Brief Reminder • Charge Transfer Tests • Flash Lamp pulsing through MgF2 window. • Simple system: • Two Modes: • GEMS same;collect charge on the Grid • Grid && Top-Top same • Adjust dV of GEM • Adjust dV of 1st gap • Collect charge on mid GEM

  3. HV Preamp Amp 5 mm HV Scope GEM HV HV Preamp Amp GEM GEM TOF Spectrometer: • Increased gap to mesh. • Allows “TOF” measurementto separate (somewhat)the prompt electrons fromthe late ions. electrons ions Vmesh=900

  4. True Path ShouldInclude Diffusion Procedure • Low pressure allows one to achieve large mean-free-path (MFP) without sparking. • Large MFP with significant field allows one to measure transmission with higher electron-ion collision energies. • High Energies are necessary to achieve absorption cross sections. • Results can be “partly” scaledfor effective transmissioncoefficients: • Veff=Vapplied * (1 atm/Papplied) • Losses under-estimated for lowpressure measurements.

  5. Scans at various pressures • Data corrected for: • Noise • Lamp Drift • Ion tail • Before absorption, existence of gas leads to some loss (8% loss 1 atm vs 0.1 atm). • Tails do not align all that well after scaling. • Should normalize for primary yield…

  6. Data corrected for: • Noise • Lamp Drift • Ion tail • Equal yield at ~2000 V/5mm Fully Corrected scans • Upper limits to 1/e length can be calculated: • Take “full yield”, Y0 as peak of 0.1 atm scan. • Blame loss at high field: Y = Y0e-5mm/L0 • Learn L0 as a function of effective V. • Compare to known cross sections…

  7. Attenuation length – measured, Upper Limit • Remember that because of decreased diffusion, the measurements are further from the truth for the lowest pressures. • Fortunately, these measurements seem to be saturating in the 0.4 and 0.6 atm results. • Can compare to Lower Limit from hitting the resonant cross section(s) exactly. • Lowest point is yellow curve at ~300 mm. Rising QE

  8. Mean Free Path – theoretical Lower Limit • Assume that the electron energy during a collision is exactly in resonance (worst case). • λ = 1/nσ • “Worst case” scenario: • λa = 200 μm at 7 eV • λd = 40 μm at 15 eV • Since these MFP’s are smaller than the measured lengths, it is not impossible that the losses are indeed due to ion transport. Fig. 1. Electron scattering cross-sections in Ar and CF4: elastic momentum transfer (σm), vibrational excitation (σν4, σν3, σνind ), electron attachment (σa), dissociation (σd), excitation (σexc), and ionization (σion).

  9. What would we do to learn final answer: • Pure Theory: • Transport in gas through HBD collection field and measure the result w/ and w/o the absorption cross sections running. • Measurement: • Take transmission vs. field result and run this through the HBD collection field. • Common Denominator: • Need the HBD Collection Field (in reverse bias). • We’ve done 2D field simulations (Maxwell). • We must purchase $$$ code to do 3D.

  10. Forwardbias • NOTE: Maxwell display is non-standard: • Field lines are not continuous. • Density of field lines has no meaning. • COLOR of the field lines specifies field strength.

  11. Reverse Bias • Different than TKH’s imagination: • In reverse bias collection region is “tall” (> 150 mm). • A non-zero region of the cathode area does not enter hole. • These calculations must be re-done in 3D…

  12. Summary • At low fields, there is no loss. • At high fields, there is a loss region prior to the gain region: • Limits on max loss in worst field: • Upper Limit to 1/e lengths ~300 mm. • Lower Limit to 1/e lengths ~40 mm. • Field of HBD goes from: • Low field, good transmission. • Medium field, high absorption. • High field, gain (home free!) • Need to convolute more realistic field profiles with the absorption limits to get effective transmission. • Results are probably not too bad as long as the regime of medium field is fairly short in length…seems likely to TKH’s imagination.

  13. Other News • These will be the last measurements of the transmission for a while (even though further conclusions can be forth-coming based upon E-field calculations). • We’re now getting ready for the rebuild: • Clean tent survey with brand new dust meter. • Clean up the tent’s bad spots. • Beginning survey of status of extra GEMs. • Expect to make a cathode for scintillation measurements by end of week. • Will start thinking about practical shades design.

More Related