1 / 16

Nataliia Kussul, Andrii Shelestov, Sergii Skakun, Oleksii Kravchenko

Nataliia Kussul, Andrii Shelestov, Sergii Skakun, Oleksii Kravchenko Space Resarch Institute NASU-NSAU, Ukraine. Forecasting winter wheat yield in Ukraine using 3 different approaches. Content. Description of methods NDVI-based Meteorological data based CGMS Comparison of results.

kacy
Download Presentation

Nataliia Kussul, Andrii Shelestov, Sergii Skakun, Oleksii Kravchenko

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Nataliia Kussul, Andrii Shelestov, Sergii Skakun, Oleksii Kravchenko Space Resarch Institute NASU-NSAU, Ukraine Forecasting winter wheat yield in Ukraine using 3 different approaches

  2. Content • Description of methods • NDVI-based • Meteorological data based • CGMS • Comparison of results

  3. NDVI-based empirical model • NDVI-based regression models for forecasting winter wheat yields were built for each oblast dYі = Yі - Tі = f(NDVIі) = b0 + b1*NDVIі Min = 0.019 t/ha per year Max = 0.197t/ha per year Criteria Rel. eff. =

  4. Winter wheat yield forecasting • Cross-validation • leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) • using a single observation from the original sample as the testing data, and the remaining observations as the training data • Criteria • RMSE on testing data

  5. Meteorological model • A non-linear model for winter wheat yield forecasting that incorporates climatic parameters was built for the Steppe agro-climatic zone. • To model the relationship between crop productivity (in particular winter wheat) and main climatic parameters • Maximum temperature • Minimum temperature • Average temperature • Precipitation • Soil moisture • 0-20 cm depth • Available for months: Sept, Oct, Apr, May, June • Methodology • Correlation analysis • Linear multivariate regression • Non-linear multivariate regression

  6. Non-linear effects Corr coef april - 0.75

  7. Gaussian processes regression

  8. CGMS • Results of Crop Growth Monitoring System (CGMS) adopted for Ukraine • The use of meteorological data from 180 local weather stations at a daily time step for the last 13 years (from 1998 to 2011) • The new soil map of Ukraine at the 1:2,500,000 scale • The new agrometeorological data (crop data) were collected and ingested into the CGMS system • Yield forecasting

  9. Comparison the results of NDVI-based regression model with CGMS Prediction for 2010, models are trained for 2000-2009

  10. Comparison the results of NDVI-based regression model with CGMS Prediction for 2010, models are trained for 2000-2009: error histogram

  11. Comparison of models • RMSE for predicting yield for 2010, models are trained for 2000-2009 • NDVI: 0.79 t/ha • For steppe zone: 0.61 t/ha • Error can be reduced ~1.3 times when NDVI averaged by winter wheat mask • CGMS-May: 0.37 t/ha • For steppe zone: 0.24 t/ha • CGMS-June: 0.30 t/ha • For steppe zone: 0.19 t/ha • Meteo: 0.86 t/ha • Problem of over-fitting • For steppe zone: 0.26 t/ha

  12. NDVI averaged by mask • Masks need to be estimated for each year • For steppe zone: • NDVI: 0.61 t/ha • NDVI-mask: 0.46 t/ha • CGMS-May: 0.24 t/ha • CGMS-June: 0.19 t/ha Kirovohradska obl.

  13. Geoportal: crop maps

  14. Thank you!

More Related