780 likes | 1.03k Views
April 15, 2011 - CLW. 2. Discussion Topics . Cultural DiversityWorkforce Diversity Differences between EEO/AA/DiversityNational Weather Service's approach to Diversity ManagementStatistical analysis of NWS workforceWhat are the demographics of the NWS? How has it changed? Where is it going?
E N D
1. 1 April 15, 2011 - CLW National Weather Service’sWFO - Lacrosse, WisconsinLeadership Conference Thursday, May 4, 2011
Charly Wells, Director OEODM NWSHDQTRS
Silver Spring Maryland
2. April 15, 2011 - CLW 2 Discussion Topics Cultural Diversity
Workforce Diversity
Differences between EEO/AA/Diversity
National Weather Service’s approach to Diversity Management
Statistical analysis of NWS workforce
What are the demographics of the NWS? How has it changed? Where is it going?
How has diversity improved our mission over the years? Examples? Stories?
How has our awareness of diversity changed over the years? How has it improved our agency and mission?
3. April 15, 2011 - CLW 3 Recruitment Efforts at NOAA Corporate Recruitment
No Specific Recruiters
Difficult to identify (Recruiters) in the Line Offices
Distribution of Announcements and Key Vacancies
Increase applicant pool
Targeted communities
Results Oriented (Wide Dissemination)
Key Minority Organizations (Specific locations based on underrepresentation)
Line Office Participation (EEO Managers)
Plan to reduce Under representation
4. April 15, 2011 - CLW 4 EEO/AA/Diversity Equal Employment Opportunity
EEO concerns legal compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies.
Affirmative Action (Affirmative Employment Program)
Affirmative Action concerns special recruitment and developmental efforts to overcome under-representation
Diversity (Diversity Management)
Diversity concerns maximizing and maintaining effective working relationships.
5. April 15, 2011 - CLW 5 A Definition of: Diversity in the Workplace Diversity is the mixture of differences and similarities each employee brings to the workplace to accomplish the mission of the Organization.
6. Two Types of Diversity Cultural diversity concerns differences created in society and brought to the workplace through the hiring process
Workforce diversity is limited to the boundaries of the organization. It concerns differences that are created by the organization’s own structure and culture April 15, 2011 - CLW 6
7. April 15, 2011 - CLW 7 2011 USA Population
8. April 15, 2011 - CLW 8 Change In Population
9. April 15, 2011 - CLW 9
10. April 15, 2011 - CLW 10 Intro- National/Regional Change
INTRODUCTION
The 2010 Census reported 308.7 million people in the United States, a 9.7 percent increase from the Census 2000 population of 281.4 million. This report discusses population change between 2000 and 2010 for several geographic levels, including regions, states, metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas, counties, and places.
NATIONAL AND REGIONAL CHANGE
The increase of 9.7 percent over the last decade was lower than the 13.2 percent increase for the 1990s and comparable to the growth during the 1980s of 9.8 percent (Figure 1). Since 1900, only the 1930s experienced a lower growth rate (7.3 percent) than this past decade.1
From 2000 to 2010, regional growth was much faster for the South and West (14.3 and 13.8 percent, respectively) than for the Midwest (3.9 percent) and Northeast (3.2 percent)
(Table 1, Figure 2). The South grew by 14.3 million over the decade to 114.6 million people, while the West increased by 8.7 million to reach 71.9 million people—surpassing the population of the Midwest. The Midwest gained 2.5 million, increasing that region’s population to 66.9 million, and the Northeast’s gain of 1.7 million brought that region’s
11. April 15, 2011 - CLW 11
12. April 15, 2011 - CLW 12 Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders New Census Bureau data show that Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders are continuing to become a growing part of our nation’s economy. Between 2002 and 2007, Native Hawaiian- and Other Pacific Islander-owned businesses saw a growth of 31 percent in number, while U.S. businesses overall only increased 18 percent between 2002 and 2007. Native Hawaiian-and Other Pacific Islander-owned businesses also saw a 52 percent increase in revenue, while total business receipts for U.S. businesses increased only 33 percent.
This glimpse into the economic activity of Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders comes from the Survey of Businesses Owners, which is conducted every five years. This survey is the only regularly collected, comprehensive economic data on Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders and provides an important look at them as entrepreneurs.
Collected for the business year 2007, the data tell how much these businesses earned, how many people they employed, and the kinds of businesses they are in. For example, construction and retail trade accounted for 44 percent of Native Hawaiian- and Other Pacific Islander-owned business receipts.
Data show that about 56 percent of all Native Hawaiian- and Other Pacific Islander businesses were owned by people of Native Hawaiian origin in 2007. Guamanian- or Chamorro-owned businesses accounted for 10 percent, Samoan-owned businesses for 8.0 percent, and businesses owned by people of Other Pacific Islander descent for 25 percent.
Future data from the survey, to be released in June, will allow you to dig deeper into the characteristics of the owners and their businesses—their age and education, sources of start up capital and more.
More information on Native Hawaiian- and Other Pacific Islander-owned firms for your geographic area is available on the Census Bureau website.
13. April 15, 2011 - CLW 13 Percent Change in Minority by County
14. April 15, 2011 - CLW 14 2010 Census During the 2010 Census, questions on race and Hispanic origin were asked of every individual living in the United States. These data provide a snapshot of race and Hispanic origin in the United States.
According to the 2010 Census, 308.7 million people resided in the United States on April 1, 2010, an increase of 27.3 million people, or 9.7 percent, between 2000 and 2010. The vast majority of the growth in the total population came from increases in those who reported their race(s) as something other than White alone and those who reported their ethnicity as Hispanic or Latino.
More than half of the growth in the total population of the United States between 2000 and 2010 was due to the increase in the Hispanic population.
Between 2000 and 2010, the Hispanic population grew by 43 percent. The Hispanic population increased by 15.2 million between 2000 and 2010, accounting for over half of the 27.3 million increase in the total population of the United States.
The overwhelming majority of the total population of the United States reported only one race in 2010.
In the 2010 Census, 97 percent of all respondents reported only one race. The largest group reported White alone (72 percent). The Black or African American alone population represented 13 percent of the total population. In addition, 0.9 percent of respondents indicated American Indian and Alaska Native alone and about 5 percent identified their race as Asian alone. The smallest major race group was Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, representing 0.2 percent of the total population.
The examination of racial and ethnic group distributions nationally shows that while the non-Hispanic White alone population is still numerically and proportionally the largest major race and ethnic group in the United States, it is also growing at the slowest rate.
Throughout the decade, the Census Bureau will release additional information on race and Hispanic origin population groups, which will provide more insights to the nation’s racial and ethnic diversity.
15. April 15, 2011 - CLW 15 What’s the Difference? EEO – Statutory
All personnel actions free from discrimination
Enforcement mechanism
Affirmative Action – Statutory
Requires AAPs / Goals
Recruitment & Outreach
Special Emphasis – Minorities and Women
Diversity – Voluntary
Process driven/Mission Focus
Inclusive v. Exclusive
Retention / Work Environment/Employee
Development
16. April 15, 2011 - CLW 16 The Diversity Connection
17. April 15, 2011 - CLW 17 Background look at Diversity Management @ DOC & NOAA DOC Seven Diversity Tenets
Inclusion
Opportunity
Comprehensiveness
Accessibility
Training
Management
Evaluation
The late Ron Brown (2/22/94) stated that “Diversity is the key to the future success of the Department of Commerce. We are charged with effectively competing in a world-wide arena and, if we are to succeed in that competition, each of us must embrace the value of diversity as being critical to the achievement of our mission” NOAA’s Five Phase approach to Managing Diversity (Dr. Roosevelt Thomas)
Advocacy
Getting stake holder to buy the concepts and process.
Diagnostic
Discovering where the organization is today.
Planning
Determining where the organization wants to go and what is available to help it get there.
Implementation
Determining the mechanisms for change.
Feedback
Measuring and setting actions for continuous improvement.
Managing the Diversity Life Cycle – The process is continuous as the organization pursues an organizational culture change process of improving the work environment for all employees. The managing diversity initiatives listed do not represent static actions that can be checked off a list.
18. April 15, 2011 - CLW 18 NWS Diversity Management Strategic Plan Examine – the current culture of the organization (how we treat our employees)
Understand – NOAA’s NWS definition of Diversity Management and the positive impact of an inclusive work environment. Identify areas where improvement is vital to the success of the organization (people relationships)
Engage – the entire workforce (Senior Managers to employees) in creating an atmosphere in which each employee can reach their full potential and feel valued in the workplace
Evaluate – work relationships that work and those that need improvement. Reward success and recognize failures to determine best practices
19. The National Weather Service April 15, 2011 - CLW 19
20. Why are the Top Ten Offices Doing so Well? Better Science and Technology? No.
Easier Verification? No.
Easier Storms? No.
More Practice? No.
Better at Diversity Management???
21. Hypothesis
22. Methodology Obtained 2000 & 2001 Tornado Warning Statistics for each NWS forecast office
Ranked all forecast offices by skill
Requested a special aggregate report of NOAA’s all-employee survey (SFA) for the Top 10 and Bottom 10 forecast offices in skill
Compared the two reports for significant differences
23. Supervision
24. Fairness
25. Fairness
26. Fairness
27. Fairness
28. Findings from Phone Interviews of Top Ten Forecast Offices Manager leadership demonstrated through action (working shifts, severe weather) often in a subordinate role
Managers do not micro-manage severe weather operations
Some managers had anti-role models
Managers back up their forecasters’ decisions
Managers foster open dialog
Managers are careful in hiring people to enhance the existing team (consider both skills and personality)
Office commitment to improvement
29. Findings from Phone Interviews of Top Ten Forecast Offices Managers work closely with the union representatives
Managers support family/personal needs
Offices seem to have low staff turnover
Managers have strong focus on making the work satisfying and enjoyable for their employees
Managers work to make sure that all employees are appreciated (both mets and non-mets)
Managers reward quickly and often
Management team support manager’s goals
31. Weather Forecast Office (WFO) Culture Characteristics
“Family” unit of 20-30 people, isolated from other offices
Relatively homogenous in gender, ethnicity, age
Experienced (10-25 yrs)
Unionized – can be contentious
High value placed on Science and Technology and Dedication to Mission
32. Which Storms are Tornadic?
33. Data for 50 Weather Forecast Offices:
Critical Success Index (CSI) – key measure of tornado warning performance that combines hits, misses, and false alarms
Hits: Number of positive forecasts followed by an event occurrence
Misses: Number of occurrences that were not predicted
False Alarms: Number of positive forecasts that were not accompanied by an event
Sick leave hours per month per employee
Employee Satisfaction – from a Sirota survey of 12,000 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) employees
Conducted as part of a diversity strategy
Approximately 130 multiple-choice questions
Administered through February of 2002
34. Data on 50 Weather Forecast Offices (continued):
Controlled variables – several variables thought to affect tornado warning performance accuracy were statistically controlled for:
Employee tenure
Education level
Number of employees at each site
Geography
Number of tornado events
F-Scale of tornadoes
Other potential influences were comparable across the offices:
Technology
Training opportunities
38. Highest Survey Correlates of Sick Leave A clear pattern of relationships emerges:
Work group cooperation and teamwork
Within work groups (r = -0.30 *)
Between work groups (r = -0.41 **)
Supervisor behavior
Responsive to employee ideas (r = -0.40 **)
Fair (r = -0.36 *) and Supportive (r = -0.35 *)
Relationship with union representative (r = -0.40 **)
Performance and diversity
In other words . . .
WFO culture has a strong and consistent impact on sick leave
And, ultimately on make argertornado warnings
40. NWS Tornado Warning Performance
41. NWS Tornado Warning Performance
43. Conclusions (cont.) Where diversity is managed better, a better job is done carrying out the National Weather Service mission!
Where diversity is managed better, the cost of carrying out the National Weather Service mission is reduced!
SFA 2002 results show that the National Weather Service should focus on aligning the management practices in the all our offices with the NOAA Diversity Vision. An improvement strategy based only on science and technology without an aggressive diversity management component is likely to fall short of the mark.
This is the Business Case for Diversity Management for NOAA’s National Weather Service
45. What does Diversity have to do with it?Isn’t high performance just the result of leadership and good management?
46. TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP: The burden of accommodation falls on the employees. They must accommodate the style and preferences of the manager.DIVERSITY-BASED LEADERSHIP: The manager and employees work together to accommodate the styles and preferences of everyone.
48. Performance vs Culture Index
50. Performance vs Culture Index
52. April 15, 2011 - CLW 52 NWS Women Profile By Workforce
53. NWS Workforce FY 2008
54. April 15, 2011 - CLW 54 NWS Women Profile By Workforce
55. April 15, 2011 - CLW 55 CLF and NWS Women and Men Profiles By Workforce
56. April 15, 2011 - CLW 56 Diversity Management Managing diversity is a long-term change strategy enabling the organization to examine its fundamental values and culture to determine whether all employees are reaching their full potential and making maximum contributions to the mission. Effective Diversity management promotes productivity and respect in the workplace for differences and similarities each person brings to the work place.
57. April 15, 2011 - CLW 57 Benefits of a DMI Boosts employee morale
Increases employee productivity by utilizing talents
Creates a work environment that allows everyone to reach their full potential (inclusiveness)
Provides multiple options for dealing with workplace diversity
Reduces complaints and grievances
Seeks multiple perspectives on problem solving
ADR, EEO, Union, EAP, WFL Center
Organizational Necessity (Protecting Life and Property)
58. April 15, 2011 - CLW 58 Diversity Adoption Process
59. April 15, 2011 - CLW 59 Diversity Management Best Practices Diversity Management Strategic Plan
Diversity Management Council
Creating Implementation Guidelines (Strategic Plan)
Conducting Regional Diversity Conferences
Southern Region Cell Concept
OEODM NWS HDQTS participation
Developing Diversity Management Marketing Plan
Administer Poster Contest
Web based Diversity Management Tool Box
E-Learning Diversity Curriculum
Develop NWS PPP
Agency initiatives (AOP, training, awards, strategic plans, etc..)
60. NWS Diversity Management April 15, 2011 - CLW 60
61. April 15, 2011 - CLW 61 Advancement and Development Training
Agency Career Development Programs
Administrative Staff Development
Mid-Career Development Programs
SES Candidate Programs (opm.gov/SES/candevprg.html)
Aspiring Leader Programs
New Leader Program (GS7-11)
Executive Leadership Program (GS11-13)
Executive Potential Program (GS13-15)
Congressional Fellows Program (GS13-15)
SES Developmental Seminars
Human Resources Professionals Development Leadership Program
62. April 15, 2011 - CLW 62 Federal Learning &Exchange Programs Intergovernmental Personnel Act Mobility Program (www.opm.gov/programs/ipa)
Detail and Transfer of Federal Employees to International Organizations (www.opm.gov/employ/internat)
Executive in Resident Program (www.leadership.opm.gov/content.cfm?CAT=EIRP)
Individual Career Enhancing Activities
Rotational Assignments and details
Mentoring
Professional Associations
Retention Incentives (www.opm.gov/oca/pay/HTML/RETALLFS.asp)
Student Load Repayment (www.opm.gov/oca/pay/StudentLoan/index.asp
Relocation Incentives (www.opm.gov/oca/pay/HTML/RELBONFS.asp)
63. April 15, 2011 - CLW 63 Key Partnerships in Diversity Management Employee Assistance Programs (EAP)
Work and Family Life Center (W&FLC)
Employee Unions
Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Human Resources Mgmt Office (WFMO)
Agency Training Office
Supervisors and Managers
Regional Committees/Employees
All are vital players/components of a
successful Diversity Management Process
64. April 15, 2011 - CLW 64 Measurement Promotion opportunities
Training
Development opportunities
Details, cross training
Upward mobility
Training Conferences, symposiums
Return on Investment
Retention
Promotability outside the organization
65. NWS Promotions FY 2006-2010
66. NWS Promotions FY 2006-2010
67. NWS Promotions FY 2006-2010
68. April 15, 2011 - CLW 68 NWS Minority Profile By Organization
69. April 15, 2011 - CLW 69 NWS Minority Profile By Organization
70. April 15, 2011 - CLW 70 NWS Minority Profile By Organization
71. April 15, 2011 - CLW 71 NWS Minority Profile By Organization
72. April 15, 2011 - CLW 72 NWS Minority Profile By Organization
73. April 15, 2011 - CLW 73 NWS Minority Profile By Organization
74. April 15, 2011 - CLW 74 NWS Minority Profile By Organization
75. April 15, 2011 - CLW 75 Roles/Responsibilities (cont’d) Change Agents (NWS Champions)
Coordinate Change
Lead staff persons
Liaison to OEODM
Participate in strategic planning
Conduits of information
Measure Success and Failures
Evaluate progress
Recognize/reward Champions
76. April 15, 2011 - CLW 76 Asian and Pacific Islanders Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Filipinos, South Asians (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshis, Sri Lankans, Nepalese, and Burmese), Pacific Islanders, Southeast Asians, (Vietnamese, Thai, Cambodians, Laotians, Hmong, Mein) as well as Indonesians and Malaysians.
77. April 15, 2011 - CLW 77 AAPI Cultural Group Population Description Difficult The 2004 American Community - Asians Census report the population of the Asian and Pacific Islanders in the US consists of:
23.4% are Chinese
18.16% are Asian Indian
17.8% are Filipino
10.5% are Vietnamese
10.3% are Korean
7.0% are Other Pacific Islander
6.9% are Japanese
5.5% are other Asian
78. April 15, 2011 - CLW 78 EEOC’s Naomi C. Earp Began a dialog with representative from the AAPI Federal Community in 2005 and 2006;
Federal Asian Pacific American Council
Asian American Government Executive Network
Problems not just employment but federal special emphasis programs and complaints
By Fall 2007 Earp found compelling problems raised by this group:
Employment;
Special Emphasis;
Complaints.
The AAPIWG was formed to examine the three problem areas:
Employment – 2.6 million employed, 5.9% Asian Americans
At SES level less than 2% are Asian Americans
Special Emphasis (the forgotten Minority) Lacked support
Complaints – 15% of all workers believed they were subjected to some sort of Discrimination or unfair treatment
31% of Asians surveyed report discrimination – largest % of any ethnic group
African American @ 26%
Asian Population and Demographics – Dr. Paul Ong of UCLA
http://www.eeoc.gov/abouteeoc/meeting/7-22-08/index.hmtl.
Grown Rapidly over the past 25 years
Over 4% of the US pop (11 mil) are of Asian and Pacific Islander decent
Will increase to almost 40 mil by 2050
Education
Barriers “Glass Ceiling” vs “Bamboo Ceiling” Absence in Leadership position
Perceived discrimination
79. April 15, 2011 - CLW 79 For More Information: NWS Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity Management
(OEODM) (301) 713-0692
Charly Wells, Director, OEODM
Charly.Wells@noaa.gov
The Key To Success In The Workplace Is Effective Diversity Management!