100 likes | 222 Views
The Kenneth and Anne Griffin Foundation. Experimentation as a tool: wider and more practical perspectives. Min Lee, Director . Brainstorming Session. May 16, 2010. 1. August 15, 2012. Outline. www.griffin-foundation.org Experimentation as a tool for program evaluation
E N D
The Kenneth and Anne Griffin Foundation Experimentation as a tool: wider and more practical perspectives Min Lee, Director Brainstorming Session May 16, 2010 1 August 15, 2012
Outline • www.griffin-foundation.org • Experimentation as a tool for program evaluation • Running experiments does not need to be complex • The benefits of thinking about experimentation • Additional thoughts August 15, 2012 2
Experimentation as a tool for program evaluation • Why is it important? • Organization providing after school programs to seniors in a high school • Provides support in math and English • Students: • higher scores in state standardized assessments in math and English • higher high school graduation rate • compared to school district averages August 15, 2012 3
Experimentation as a tool for program evaluation August 15, 2012 4
Experimentation as a tool for program evaluation • Question: is the school district the appropriate comparison group? • Had the seniors not participated in the after school program, what would have their math/English scores and graduation rates been? • Answer: we don’t know • What’s driving the higher scores/graduation rates? The program or something else? • Why is this kind of questions important? • Gets to the fundamental issue of its effectiveness • Accountability to constituents and stakeholders • Applicable to other organizations: Charter school, food pantry, services to alcoholics/drug addicts, etc. • Experimentation can help us answer these questions August 15, 2012 5
Running experiments does not need to be complex • Some experiments can be complex (in particular those looking to innovate) • Non-profit organizations can benefit enormously from simple experiments if they are able to: • Randomize people into treatment/control groups • Able to measure/track the relevant variables • Example: after school program • More seniors want to participate than spaces available • Randomly select those who will participate and those who will not • Track both groups in terms of math and English scores and high school graduation rate August 15, 2012 6
Running experiments does not need to be complex • Example: organization that relies on volunteers to serve the constituents • Volunteer retention is critical and your manager has different initiatives that would increase retention rate • Don’t implement all the initiatives across all volunteers • For a smaller group, test the initiatives by randomizing volunteers into them • Measure the retention rates relative to the cost of the initiatives August 15, 2012 7
The benefits of thinking about experiments • Organizations seriously thinking about ‘effects’ and how to measure them • Organizations thinking seriously about ‘causation’ • Organizations thinking seriously about ‘selection bias’ August 15, 2012 8
Additional thoughts • Partnerships with researchers • Take advantage of the experimental economists • Training/hiring staff members to think about these issues August 15, 2012 9
Concluding remarks • Successful in convincing you that… • Experimentation is not an esoteric tool used by scientist • BUT a tool that is relevant to your organization • Your organization can also run experiments and learn from the results to better serve your constituents • Even if you cannot run experiments… • There are benefits from being SERIOUS about cause/effect and proper measurement/comparison • Need to have staff members to be able to think about these issues… • BUT don’t need econ Ph.Ds August 15, 2012 10