240 likes | 338 Views
The Institutional Preconditions of Capitalism. Respect for private property and a willingness to abide by agreements A system of a laws reflecting those norms Orderly and impartial enforcement of those laws. HOW THESE PRINCIPLES ARE MANIFESTED IN U.S. Self-Executing Regulation
E N D
The Institutional Preconditions of Capitalism • Respect for private property and a willingness to abide by agreements • A system of a laws reflecting those norms • Orderly and impartial enforcement of those laws
HOW THESE PRINCIPLES ARE MANIFESTED IN U.S. Self-Executing Regulation State Enforced Regulation Administratively Executed/State Enforced Regulation
Self-Executed Regulation • Defendant violates a duty harming Plaintiff • Plaintiff brings civil action (takes the offender to court) • Seeks damages and/or a court order • Court (judge & jury) decides on the basis of adversarial process, court’s decision enforced by state
Examples • Contract • Misrepresentation • Product Liability
State Enforced Regulation • Defendant violates duty laid out in statute • State brings case (civil and/or criminal) against Defendant • Seeks penalties (fines, jail, corporal punishment) and/or a court order • Court (judge & jury) decides on the basis of adversarial process, court’s decision enforced by state
Examples • Sherman Act • Fraud
Administratively Executed/Federally Enforced Regulation • An administrative agency requires permit to carry out particular activity • It grants the permit if (and only if) holder agrees to abide by specified terms • Prevents those lacking permit from performing activity and enforces compliance with terms of permits • It sanctions violators -- imposes fines or, in extreme cases, withdraws permit
Examples • Wheeler Lea Act • FDAct
CONTRACT I • The basis of contract is free exchange of property rights • Ownership implies the right to buy and sell • The law doesn’t generally interfere with or constrain those rights • People are expected to abide by their agreements -- to be trustworthy
CONTRACT II • Paramount Job of Courts: Enforcing compliance with terms of voluntary agreements • Courts rarely question the adequacy of consideration • Seller responsible for making terms of contract clear • If ambiguity nevertheless exists, construe against drafter
CONTRACT III • Except where contract stipulates otherwise, usual remedy is termination of contract and return of consideration • Buyer is expected to make special arrangements where failure on part of seller would be especially costly • Seller responsible for making terms of contract clear • If ambiguity nevertheless exists, the courts will usually decide against drafter’s interpretation
PRODUCT LIABILITY I • Manufacturers and retailers owe customers a product that is effective for its stated purpose and safe when properly used • Product must be properly designed, manufactured, and marketed to the consumer • basis of the bargain damages -- i.e., the product or service is not as represented and does not perform as promised • consequential damages -- use of the good in question gives rise to damages
PRODUCT LIABILITY II • Personal injury • Anyone injured from use of product can sue • Anyone in supply chain can be sued • Often the one with the deepest pockets will be targeted, but liability is often joint and several • Plaintiff picks jurisdiction • Can seek recovery for ‘actual’ damages, pain & suffering, and punitive damages
PRODUCT LIABILITY III • Main personal injury theories • Strict liability: failure to warn of a defective design (something that could be corrected -- i.e., exploding dryer) or defective condition (ladder; hockey puck?); • Negligence: failure to: manufacture or handle the good properly, adequately inspect the good, comply with federal, state, or industry product standards. (Violating law is usually proof of negligence per se)
PRODUCT LIABILITY IV • Defenses • Abnormal use • Contributory negligence • Assumption of risk • To avoid LIABILITY under a strict liability standard, the defendant must show that the plaintiff "voluntarily and unreasonably proceeded to encounter a known danger."
FRAUD I 1. Misrepresentation (either by commission or omission) 2. of a material fact 3. Knowledge of the misrepresentation 4. Intent to deceive 5. Reliance on the part of the victim 6. Damage to the victim
FRAUD II • Puffing ≠ fraud • tampering with a used car's odometer is fraud; • claiming that it is in great shape is not. • Innocent misrepresentation is not a crime -- • misrepresentation involves all the elements of fraud but the middle two (except where the US government is the customer) • remedy for exchanges involving innocent misrepresentation is rescission of the contract and restitution of consideration.
Sherman Act: Section 1 Per se violations: Agreements among potential competitors at the same level (Horizontal arrangements) • to fix prices--explicit or implicit • to divide markets • group boycotts
Sherman Act: Section 1 (cont.) • Rule of reason offenses: Vertical arrangements) • Resale price maintenance agreements • Tying arrangements (may also violate Clayton Act) • Exclusive dealing arrangements (ditto) • Requirements Contracts (ditto)
Sherman Act: Section 2 Anti-monopoly Section (involves one legal person and requires evidence of intent to monopolize <anticompetitive acts> and success <dominant market share> • Drive competitors out of business • Market definition
Clayton Act Enforced by DOJ and Federal Trade Commission • Prohibits price discrimination • Sale of goods of like grade and quality in same market at different price that injures competition • Defenses include: Cost justified, Meeting competitors' price, Perishable goods, Unlike grade or quality
Clayton Act (cont.) Section 7 prohibits mergers likely to injure competition (HSR = not competitors = consumer welfare/efficiency) • Defenses • Failing company • No substantial lessening of competition • DOJ rules--horizontal mergers/market share, HHI = sum of squared |shares| • Prior approval, waiting period
The Federal Trade Commission • Created in 1914 by FTC Act to protect the consumer against “unfair methods of competition" • FTC Act amended by Wheeler-Lea Act "to cover unfair or deceptive acts or practices” Gave FTC broad latitude to define its responsibilities and the power to regulate advertising to prevent 'false and misleading claims' • FTC also enforces Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, Truth in lending, Fair Credit Reporting, and Fair Packaging and Labeling Acts