1 / 15

The French Model of Capitalism

The French Model of Capitalism. The French Model of Capitalism. The Traditional French post-war Model Dirigisme – directive control of the economy French Model and IPE Challenges to the French Model Neo-liberal shifts e.g. finance, privatisation Restructuring French Capitalism

kalona
Download Presentation

The French Model of Capitalism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The French Model of Capitalism

  2. The French Model of Capitalism • The Traditional French post-war Model • Dirigisme – directive control of the economy • French Model and IPE • Challenges to the French Model • Neo-liberal shifts e.g. finance, privatisation • Restructuring French Capitalism • How might we interpret changes in French political economy?

  3. The French dirigiste model • Dirigisme ‘a set of interventionist policies and directive policy-making processes’ (Schmidt 1997: 229 – see module document, p. 40). • A ‘statist’ variant of ‘co-ordinated capitalism’ (Schmidt, 2003). • France’s state-led industrial development (Zysman 1983), an actively interventionist, dirigiste, ‘player’ state using its agencies to steer national economic development (Shonfield 1969: ch. 5; Hall 1986). • Underpinned by the Republican étatiste tradition

  4. Key features of French Model • dirigiste tradition - an expansive role for the state in directive intervention in economic activity • Co-ordinating and steering mechanisms • price, credit and exchange controls • state tutelle (or guidance) of nationalized industries‘the habit of the exercise of power by public officials over the private sector of the economy’ (Shonfield, 1969: 128). • ‘institutionally allocated credit’ state’s ‘gatekeeper’ role providing strategic, cheap capital for industrial investment (Zysman). But - ‘capitalism without capital’. • The Plan – and powerful planning Ministry.

  5. Key Features of French Capitalism • Elitism:Grand corps, informal networks of business, administrative & political elites. • Pantouflage – career moves from ministry to boardroom. • Corporate Governance – ‘napoleonic’ power relations within firm. PDG (boss) autonomous from board. • ‘Protected capitalism‘ – interlocking shareholdings & board memberships (noyaux durs). Capitalism without sanction. • France’s ‘financial network economy’(Morin 2000: 38) • Industrial Relations - Conflictual and fragmented. Union and business assocs – low membership, poorly co-ordinated. • However, labour market is highly regulated -‘Strong’ state, weak civil society

  6. French Post-War Model and IPE Context • Predicated upon ‘embedded liberal’ compromise • French ‘mercantilist’ policies • competitive devaluations • Protecting strategic industries • Intervention to build up ‘national champions’ • Strong economic growth

  7. Challenges to the French model • See Ben Clift’s chapter, A Ruined Fortress? • The end of Bretton Woods • End of ‘credit rationing’ • End of competitive devaluations • Fiscal austerity • 1983 U-turn, end of redistributive Keynesianism (Hall 1986) • ‘Picking losers’ • See Levy 2000, state aids propping up failing industries

  8. ‘Neo-liberal’ change to policy & institutions • Financial Deregulation and Liberalisation • Reforming & reviving French stock markets • State or banks no longer the only sources of capital • Labour market deregulation • See Ben Clift’s chapter in Where are National Capitalisms Now? • Increased flexibility, temporary contracts etc. • Single European Act • Anti-trust regulation – state subsidies illegal • Public procurement - preferential treatment of French firms challenged

  9. ‘Privatisation’ Programme • See Schmidt From State to Market (1996) • Begun by Socialists in 1983-4, as a means of raising funds, to tackle fiscal crisis. • Stepped up under Chirac • Balladur (finance minister) hand picked sets of buyers – placing firms in safe hands • Re-constituting ‘noyaux durs’ – the French ‘financial network economy’. • Restructuring ‘protected’ capitalism • Continued by all subsequent governments - an important revenue source

  10. Restructuring French capitalism • From mid-1990s on - a progressive dismantling of the protective cocoon behind which elites restructured the French economy. • noyaux durs (previously maintained by cross-shareholding merger and acquisition strategies) began to unravel, precipitated notably by privatisation • This suggests that the ethos of ‘protected capitalism’ (Schmidt 1996) was on the wane, and an Anglo-Saxon ‘shareholder value’ logic was gaining currency

  11. Internationalisation of ownership & shareholding patterns • 1985-1997, foreign share ownership increased from 10 % to 35 % (compared to 9 % in Britain, and 6 % in the US) (Morin, 2000). • a ‘highly significant trend’ (Morin, 2000) the purchase by Anglo-Saxon Institutional investors (pension funds) of stakes in French firms relinquished by noyaux durs. • sea change in French capitalism, away from the ‘protected capitalism’ logic and towards Anglo-Saxon shareholder value norms

  12. So what? implications for French capitalism • interaction of Anglo-Saxon norms with enduring French institutions, such as the French social model • Uneven-ness of adoption of Anglo-Saxon norms – e.g. corporate governance • Little transparency and limited accountability • PDG (boss) autonomy - unchanged

  13. No Longer ‘capitalism without capital’ • dramatic increases in levels of stock market capitalisation and volume of share trading (Schmidt 2003: 537-8). • could be interpreted as a ‘liberal’ shift from a state led (bank-based) to a market led (asset-based) form of capitalism

  14. French capitalism: still distinctive? • Capital markets play a very different role in the new French model of capitalism. • Limited ‘Anglo-Saxon’ dispersal of ownership • France has yet to develop a market for corporate control (few hostile takeovers) • Real power has not shifted to shareholders, and shareholding remains much more concentrated in France than either UK or US (Schmidt 2003: 539).

  15. Conclusions • Assertions of ‘Anglo-Saxon’ transformation are dubious • Pre-existing norms & structures endure, interact with new influences • tendency to overemphasise evolutions at the international level, and underplay continuities at the domestic level. • The close-knit networks are being opened up by the influx of both foreign investors, and corporate governance norms. • Yet no teleological evolution to Anglo-Saxon capitalism. • But - by what means can state influence endure in the context of global capital markets?

More Related