1 / 15

Trends in S. aureus bacteremia 2001-2010: England compared with its Celtic neighbors

Trends in S. aureus bacteremia 2001-2010: England compared with its Celtic neighbors. Rosy Reynolds, Russell Hope on behalf of the BSAC Working Party on Resistance Surveillance. K-948 , 51 st ICAAC, Chicago, 17 - 20 Sept 2011 rosy.reynolds@nbt.nhs.uk. Scotland. N. Ireland. England. Wales.

Download Presentation

Trends in S. aureus bacteremia 2001-2010: England compared with its Celtic neighbors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Trends in S. aureus bacteremia 2001-2010:England compared with its Celtic neighbors Rosy Reynolds, Russell Hopeon behalf ofthe BSAC Working Party on Resistance Surveillance K-948, 51st ICAAC, Chicago, 17 - 20 Sept 2011 rosy.reynolds@nbt.nhs.uk

  2. Scotland N. Ireland England Wales Ireland • UK • England • Scotland • Wales • N. Ireland • Ireland Population (2009): England 51.8m Neighbours 14.5m

  3. 2010 BSAC Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance 2010 • 40 laboratories (was 25 up to 2009) • Target of 500 isolates of S. aureus /year from blood (was 250 up to 2007) • Central testing - • HPA Colindale, London. • BSAC agar dilution MICs and mecA test • Data on website: www.bsacsurv.org

  4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance Programme HPA Colindale Sponsors 2001-2010 Collecting Laboratories

  5. ?

  6. OR for difference in slope = 1.21, p=0.004

  7. Targeted interventions • Mandatory reporting (2001) • Care bundles • Hand hygiene / infection control • Mandatory admissions screening / decolonisation (2009) • Deep cleaning • Unintended effects / ecological pressures • Shorter hospital stays? • Changes in antibiotic use? • ???

  8. Other information available Sex >99% Age >99% Care setting 99% (≥48 or <48 hours in hospital) Hospital speciality 90% Presumed focus of infection 63% (70 - 56%)

  9. 7.6% of S. aureus bacteraemias were from ICU

  10. Summary 1 MRSA stable around 42%, 2001 - 2006. % MRSA fell in ICUbefore 2006 (when stable in other specialities) % of reported line-relatedS. aureus bacteraemias fell before 2006 (but equally for MRSA and MSSA) Since 2006, widespread large reduction in MRSA bacteraemias (number and %).

  11. Summary 2 • Drop in %MRSA since 2006 was • faster in England (to 14% vs. 28% by 2010) • but not affected by • age • sex • hospital-acquisition • hospital speciality • focus of infection Reasons are not clear.

More Related