10 likes | 129 Views
Students submit work through specified method. Student. Submissions are physically marked by module team. Module Team. Cause for concern is raised due to ‘indicators’ found in paper.
E N D
Students submit work through specified method Student Submissions are physically marked by module team Module Team Cause for concern is raised due to ‘indicators’ found in paper Refer to your own school policy for academic misconduct procedures. Staff are not to discuss academic misconduct with students and should advise that they will be contacted by their school to attend a meeting with CAU First Decision Point - School Module Leader Change grade on e-vision to marked grade plus ‘AM’ CAU review the evidence and make decision based on the context of a university wide consistent approach ensuring equity Second Decision Point - CAU CAU confirm schools recommendation CAU return to school for further consideration CAU • AM meeting involving students and staff • Hearing held • Decision made • Penalties if appropriate • Module leader advised CAU/ School/ Student If case proven, CAU updates the grade on SITS with the relevant penalty CAU