E N D
1. BRCA Risk factors White
Age
FH (M, S, D)
BRCA1&2
Endometrial Ca, fibrocystic disease, BRCA
Early menarche (<12), late menopause (>50)
Nulliparous or late first pregnancy
2. Breast lesions
3. Major trials on tamoxifen in DCIS NSABP B-24
UK/ANZ
NSABP B-35 (tamoxifen and anastrozole)
NSAPB P-1: 50% decrease in invasive breast cancer for LCIS and 86% decrease for ADH
4. First events in NSABP B-24 trial(Lancet. 1999; 353)
5. B-24 trial Tamoxifen decreases the cumulative incidence of breast-cancer events in women with DCIS
Most pronounced effect in younger patients (<50 yo)
Among the ER (+) DCIS lesions, tamoxifen reduced the incidence of all breast cancer events by 50%
(Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2002; 76)
6. Events in UK/ANZ trial(Lancet. 2003; 362)
7. UK/ANZ Tamoxifen did not produce additional benefit over and above that provided by radiotherapy (in a group of 316 patients, data not shown)
8. B-24 vs UK/ANZ trial
9. B-24: there is evidence that tamoxifen has some positive benefit in addition to surgery and radiotherapy
UK/ANZ: it is indeterminate that tamoxifen does not have benefit in addition to surgery and radiotherapy
10. Is it worth waiting? B-24 all event rate (per 100 per year):
Placebo Tamoxifen
All BRCA 2.9 1.8
Invasive 1.6 0.9
There is a 1% risk of a new event per year of observation
NNT=19 to avoid an event, not to save a life
11. HER2/neu Human epidermal GFR2
TK activity
Transforms cells in vitro
HER2+ BRCAs have worse prognosis
15-20% invasive tumors HER2 positive
13. Primary end-point: disease-free survival. Events: Recurrence of BRCA at any site
Ipsi- or contralateral BRCA (DCIS but not LCIS)
Non-breast Ca (not Ba/Sq skin, not cervix)
Death from any cause.
14. Exclusion criteria Distant Mts
Previous Invasive BRCA
Other neoplasms (excluding the above)
T4 tumors, inflammatory, supraclavicular LNs, suspicious int mamm nodes, prior mediastinal irradiation
Cardiac (CHF, Q wave, angina, uHTN, unstable arrhythmias, valvular disease, EF<55%)
19. Limitations Length of follow-up: risks
Length of follow-up: brain mets (1/3)
Length of follow-up: hormone status
? Correlation with HER2 expression
? Resistance to Herceptin
20. Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomized?
Were pts properly accounted for?
Follow up complete?
‘Intention to treat’?
Primary guides
21. Secondary guides Pts, healthcare workers, personnel ‘blind’?
Groups similar?
Were groups treated equally?
Statistics appropriate?
22. Results Null hypothesis accepted/rejected?
How large was the treatment effect?
How precise was the estimate of effect?