1 / 18

THE FUTURE OF THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW PROCESS

THE FUTURE OF THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW PROCESS. July 2005 IFTA Annual Business Meeting. Where Are We Today?. Established PCR process Process identifies non-compliance General voluntary compliance No mechanism to ensure compliance. Creating a Compliance Mechanism. Create process for

kane-dale
Download Presentation

THE FUTURE OF THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW PROCESS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE FUTURE OF THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW PROCESS July 2005 IFTA Annual Business Meeting

  2. Where Are We Today? • Established PCR process • Process identifies non-compliance • General voluntary compliance • No mechanism to ensure compliance

  3. Creating a Compliance Mechanism Create process for non-compliance issues identified through PCR to be addressed through dispute resolution process

  4. PCR/DRC Process • Compliance plan, follow-up and reassessment process • 2/3 of full PCRC to approve final determination finding of non-compliance • PCRC refers case to DRC for enforcement of non-compliance finding • Jurisdiction can protest non-compliance finding • DRC reviews briefs and/or holds hearing • DRC renders decision • DRC decision may be appealed to Board

  5. DRC Decision Options • No action • Immediate penalties • Penalties tied to compliance plan dates • Request for expulsion

  6. PCR/DRC Penalty Provisions • Loss of voting power • Loss of Board and standing committee seats • Double dues 60 days after voting power lost • Triple dues 1 year after voting power lost • Expulsion resolution 1 year after voting power lost

  7. Past Concerns • Non-material or insignificant issues raised to dispute • Fear of corrective action before time to resolve • No appeals process

  8. Past Concerns • Non-material or insignificant issues raised to dispute • Fear of corrective action before time to resolve • No appeals process

  9. What’s Material?Who Should Decide? • PCR Committee • PCR Team • PCR Director • PCR Administrator • IFTA, Inc. • IFTA Board • Individual jurisdiction • Jurisdictions as community

  10. How do jurisdictions decide what is material? • Materiality criteria • Governing documents

  11. Refining the Governing Documents • Compliance review requirements committee • Compliance review ballot development committee • Jurisdiction sponsored ballots

  12. Past Concerns • Non-material or insignificant issues raised to dispute • Fear of corrective action before time to resolve • No appeals process

  13. Fear of Corrective Action Before Resolution Ideal World -- Be Proactive • ID potential areas of noncompliance prior to a review • Make program adjustments as appropriate • Initiate ballots

  14. Real World -- Not Proactive Enough, Still Not a Problem • Reviews scheduled months in advance • Review report not issued for 30 days • 30 days for jurisdiction response • 35 days for Panel to recommend follow-up or reassessment • Fair and reasonable follow-up and reassessment plan dates based on jurisdiction input

  15. Past Concerns • Non-material or insignificant issues raised to dispute • Fear of corrective action before time to resolve • No appeals process

  16. Opportunity for Appeal • Jurisdiction input and involvement throughout the process • Formal appeal process for referrals to DRC • Appeal of DRC finding to the Board

  17. Steps to the Future • Standing Dispute Resolution Committee • Agreement revisions • Dispute resolution process revisions • PCR Guide revisions • 2006 may/shall ballots • Best practices guide

  18. THE FUTURE OF THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW PROCESS July 2005 IFTA Annual Business Meeting

More Related