1 / 9

The Institutional Dynamics of Security Environment in Eurasia

The Institutional Dynamics of Security Environment in Eurasia. Collaborative Reference Curriculum draft proposal – March 2005. Advantages. “ Eurasia reach ”: accounting for the changing reality Study of multilateral security institutions is an important dimension of defense education

kapila
Download Presentation

The Institutional Dynamics of Security Environment in Eurasia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Institutional Dynamics of Security Environment in Eurasia Collaborative Reference Curriculum draft proposal – March 2005

  2. Advantages • “Eurasia reach”: accounting for the changing reality • Study of multilateral security institutions is an important dimension of defense education • Combined view of both formal institutions/programs and groups of actors • Innovative framework for analysis of complementarity/competition of security institutions in Eurasia

  3. Research/teaching question I What are the main trends in the evolution of actors’ strategies and the institutional architecture in Europe after EU/NATO enlargement (2004) and the growing involvement of the U.S. in Central Eurasian security?

  4. Research/teaching question II What major groups of actors/ relevant institutions can now be distinguished in Europe/post-Soviet space?

  5. Research/teaching question III How united are the groups of actors, what are their common (or dividing) agendas?

  6. Research/teaching question IV How do the existing institutions interact: the extent of their ooperation/complementarity or competition/mutual exclusion?

  7. Institutions / actors in focus • NATO + PfP: evolution and outlook • EU as a foreign/security policy actor (the whole range of tools and policies, not only CFSP/ESDP) • New post-Soviet space institution-building initiatives (CSTO, SCO) • European Neutrals (Switzerland, Sweden, Finland, Austria, Ireland): institutional policy trends • Non-NATO states I: Balkans + Eastern Europe • Non-NATO states II: the Caucasus • Non-NATO states III: Russia

  8. Suggested structureof the content of course modules • Introduction: basic information, relevance and context • Recent developments/changes in institutional policies, current trends/drift • Interaction with other institutions/groups of actors • Outlook for cooperation/competition with other institutions/groups of actors

  9. We welcome all voluntary contributionsto the project.Please address your questions and proposals to: Patrick Lehmann p.lehmann@gcsp.ch or Mikhail Troitski troitski@obraforum.ru

More Related