80 likes | 166 Views
Retention and preservation within the Copac Tools. Michael Emly University of Leeds CCM Workshop 19 March 2012. Copac Collection Management Tools Project. JISC funding Current project runs Oct.2011 – July 2012 Partners: Mimas, RLUK, Leeds, Sheffield, York
E N D
Retention and preservation within the Copac Tools Michael Emly University of Leeds CCM Workshop 19 March 2012
Copac Collection Management Tools Project • JISC funding • Current project runs Oct.2011 – July 2012 • Partners: Mimas, RLUK, Leeds, Sheffield, York • To develop tools, based on the Copac database, to improve collection management decisions • Starting with use cases and case studies, identify the community’s needs and develop relevant tools • Work on the interface so those tools integrate with library workflows • Explore pertinent issues around retention, preservation and support for more effective coordination / collaboration in collection management
Assessing individual items strand • Quickly assess how many copies of an item are reported within Copac • Support for automated procedures and batch processing • Avoid disposal of a “last copy” • Support decisions to actively conserve or digitise • Control still rests with the individual library • But supports a coordinated approach across the community
Assessing collections strand • Starting with a collection of titles held by your library, the tool reports how many are held by each library in Copac • Also reports how many are unique to your library, held by you and one other library, etc. • Can be based on any subset of your holdings, or any search within Copac (e.g. by author or subject) • Allows a library to assess the strength of its holdings in a given subject or collection • “How do my collections fit into the national picture?” • “Which collections should I prioritise for retention, conservation, digitisation?” • Supports a coordinated approach across the community
Retention and preservation strand • Flows from work on other two strands • Objective is to help libraries to signal their intentions with respect to individual items, or collections, via the Copac database • Identify the issues involved and begin to find solutions, particularly for material sitting outside “Special Collections” • Perhaps build mechanisms to facilitate transfer of material if this is identified as a need • Permit a less haphazard approach to retention and preservation • Ensure best use of scarce resources • Safeguard access for scholars
Objectives of today’s workshop • Understand what information you would like to have access to, and how • Understand what information you would be prepared to contribute to Copac • Identify key drivers for Copac contributors and other partners • Identify benefits for individual libraries • Identify barriers to implementation • Think about mechanisms for collaboration • Begin to think about specifications, formats, workflows and systems
Our work plan for today • Group discussion • Feedback • Identify common themes and points of agreement • Discussion • Agree next steps
And longer term • Suggest a framework of objectives around retention and preservation • Agree a common vocabulary • Develop a specification for development within the Copac Tools • Stimulate and feed into broader discussion e.g. JISC, RLUK, UKRR, etc. • • Development of an agreed national strategy and framework to safeguard access for scholars in the long term