270 likes | 441 Views
Immunogenicity of combined vaccines in infants. Helena Käyhty, PhD National Public Health Institute Dept of Vaccines Helsinki, Finland. Combined vs . reference administration hexavalent vaccines.
E N D
Immunogenicity of combined vaccines in infants Helena Käyhty, PhD National Public Health Institute Dept of Vaccines Helsinki, Finland
Combined vs. reference administrationhexavalent vaccines • Gylca et al. Vaccine 2001: DTaP-HBV-IPV / Hib vs. DTwP-IPV mixed with Hib +HBV at 6, 10, 14 weeks • Schmitt et al. J Ped 2000: mixed vs. separate DTaP-HBV-IPV / Hib at 2, 3, 4 months • Mallet et al. PIDJ 2000: DTaP-HBV-IPV-Hib vs. DTaP-IPV-Hib / HBV at 2, 4 and 6 months
Three doses, combined vs. separate administration in different studies
Mechanisms??? • Missing adjuvant effect of wP • Epitopic supression - antigenic competition • Physicochemical interference
Immunogenicity trials in Sweden (3,5,12 mo) and Finland (4,6,14 mo)
B B CHO Anti-CHO Ab T HELP Anti-Tetanus Ab Tet B B
B Anti-CHO Ab HELP Anti-Tetanus Ab
PncT, PRP-T and T simultaneouslyDose of PncT and response to PRP-T and Tetanus toxoid (Dagan et al. 1998)
Concomitant administration 2 cm apart in the same leg at 2, 4 and 6 moEskola et al.
Clinical implications? • Are the induced anti-Hib responses high enough for protection? • Experience from Finland, Sweden, the UK and Germany
Immunogenicity trials in Sweden (3,5,12 mo) and Finland (4,6,14 mo)
Three doses, combined vs. separate administration in different studies
DTaP/Hib/(IPV) combinations in Germany Schmitt et al 2001 • 2 year follow up after the introduction of combined vaccines • Overall VE 97.5 % (96.3-98.4) • 1 dose 88.6 % (76.1-94.3) • 2 doses 95.1 % (92.2-97.0) • 3 doses 98.8 % (98.2-99.3)
Measurement of the immune response to vaccination Vaccine Sample Antibody
Capsular polysaccharides (PS) • Antibodies protective • Poor and short lasting immune response in infants and children • Long lasting antibody response in older children and adults • TI-antigens -> no memory -> protection is based on existing antibodies
Conjugate vaccines???? • immunogenicity improved by conjugating PS to carrier proteins -> TD properties -> antibody response even in infancy • development of memory • protection may last longer than detectable antibody • memory B cells triggered upon challenge -> high and quick antibody response • increase in avidity -> antibodies may function better
How to test development of memory • Memory B cells • Priming with conjugate and booster with PS • PS mimics contact with bacteria • more memory B cells to be triggered by PS • high antibody response of IgG isotype • Avidity maturation
Increasing Affinity / Avidity 104 108 1012
1.0 0.9 100.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 10.0 0.5 0.4 0.3 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 Geometric mean titer (GMT) and GM avidity index (GMAI) Avidity Titre Anti-PRP Igg (GMT µg/ml) Avidity Index (GMAI) Age (months) Goldblatt et al., JID 177, 1998, 1112-5
Avidity of anti-6B Pnc PS-primary seria at 2,4,6 mo with a conjugate - booster at 14 mo with conjugate or PS
Laboratory surrogates for evaluation of new conjugates, modified from Frasch 1995 • antibody response in infancy • persistence of antibodies (up to booster dose) • induction of immunologic memory • PS-vaccine • avidity • isotype/subclass distribution and avidity of antibodies • functional activity of antibodies (opsonic or bactericidal activity)
Mucosal immune response • is or may be important when • local mucosal infection • colonization precedes disease • the role as a surrogate test unknown